Blood-brain barrier disruption and delivery of irinotecan in a rat model using a clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound system.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 05 2020
Historique:
received: 11 12 2019
accepted: 17 03 2020
entrez: 31 5 2020
pubmed: 31 5 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We investigated controlled blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a low-frequency clinical transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (TcMRgFUS) device and evaluated enhanced delivery of irinotecan chemotherapy to the brain and a rat glioma model. Animals received three weekly sessions of FUS, FUS and 10 mg/kg irinotecan, or irinotecan alone. In each session, four volumetric sonications targeted 36 locations in one hemisphere. With feedback control based on recordings of acoustic emissions, 98% of the sonication targets (1045/1071) reached a pre-defined level of acoustic emission, while the probability of wideband emission (a signature for inertial cavitation) was than 1%. BBB disruption, evaluated by mapping the R1 relaxation rate after administration of an MRI contrast agent, was significantly higher in the sonicated hemisphere (P < 0.01). Histological evaluation found minimal tissue effects. Irinotecan concentrations in the brain were significantly higher (P < 0.001) with BBB disruption, but SN-38 was only detected in <50% of the samples and only with an excessive irinotecan dose. Irinotecan with BBB disruption did not impede tumor growth or increase survival. Overall these results demonstrate safe and controlled BBB disruption with a low-frequency clinical TcMRgFUS device. While irinotecan delivery to the brain was not neurotoxic, it did not improve outcomes in the F98 glioma model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32472017
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65617-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-65617-6
pmc: PMC7260193
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Prodrugs 0
Topoisomerase I Inhibitors 0
Irinotecan 7673326042

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8766

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA174645
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH116858
Pays : United States

Références

Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N. & Jolesz, F. A. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. Radiology 220, 640–646 (2001).
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2202001804
Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Sheikov, N. A., Jolesz, F. A. & Vykhodtseva, N. Local and reversible blood-brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications. Neuroimage 24, 12–20 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.046
McDannold, N., Arvanitis, C. D., Vykhodtseva, N. & Livingstone, M. S. Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. Cancer Res 72, 3652–3663 (2012).
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0128
Tung, Y. S., Marquet, F., Teichert, T., Ferrera, V. & Konofagou, E. E. Feasibility of noninvasive cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and microbubbles in nonhuman primates. Appl Phys Lett 98, 163704 (2011).
doi: 10.1063/1.3580763
Beccaria, K. et al. Opening of the blood-brain barrier with an unfocused ultrasound device in rabbits. J. Neurosurg 119, 887–898 (2013).
doi: 10.3171/2013.5.JNS122374
Carpentier, A. et al. Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci. Transl. Med 8, 1–9 (2016).
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6086
Mainprize, T. et al. Blood-Brain Barrier Opening in Primary Brain Tumors with Non-invasive MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound: A Clinical Safety and Feasibility Study. Sci. Rep 9, 321 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36340-0
Lipsman, N. et al. Blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease using MR-guided focused ultrasound. Nat Commun 9, 2336 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04529-6
Marty, B. et al. Dynamic study of blood-brain barrier closure after its disruption using ultrasound: a quantitative analysis. J Cereb. Blood Flow Metab 32, 1948–1958 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.100
Aryal, M., Arvanitis, C. D., Alexander, P. M. & McDannold, N. Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 72, 94–109 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.008
Liu, H. L. et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound enhances delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs for glioblastoma treatment. Radiology 255, 415–425 (2010).
doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090699
Mei, J. et al. Experimental study on targeted methotrexate delivery to the rabbit brain via magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. J. Ultrasound Med 28, 871–880 (2009).
doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.7.871
Wei, K. C. et al. Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening to enhance temozolomide delivery for glioblastoma treatment: a preclinical study. Plos One 8, e58995 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058995
Aryal, M., Vykhodtseva, N., Zhang, Y. Z., Park, J. & McDannold, N. Multiple treatments with liposomal doxorubicin and ultrasound-induced disruption of blood-tumor and blood-brain barriers improve outcomes in a rat glioma model. J Control Release 169, 103–111 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.04.007
Beccaria, K. et al. Ultrasound-induced opening of the blood-brain barrier to enhance temozolomide and irinotecan delivery: an experimental study in rabbits. J. Neurosurg 124, 1602–1610 (2016).
doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142893
Elias, W. J. et al. A Randomized Trial of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Essential Tremor. N. Engl. J. Med 375, 730–739 (2016).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600159
O’Reilly, M. A., Huang, Y. & Hynynen, K. The impact of standing wave effects on transcranial focused ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier in a rat model. Phys Med Biol 55, 5251–5267 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/18/001
Wei, K. C. et al. Neuronavigation-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening: a preliminary study in swine. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol 34, 115–120 (2013).
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3150
Huang, Y., Alkins, R., Schwartz, M. L. & Hynynen, K. Opening the Blood-Brain Barrier with MR Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound: Preclinical Testing on a Trans-Human Skull Porcine Model. Radiology 282, 123–130 (2017).
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152154
McDannold, N. et al. Acoustic feedback enables safe and reliable carboplatin delivery across the blood-brain barrier with a clinical focused ultrasound system and improves survival in a rat glioma model. Theranostics, in press (2019).
Shen, Y. et al. T1 relaxivities of gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents in human whole blood at 1.5, 3, and 7 T. Invest Radiol 50, 330–338 (2015).
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000132
Lele, P. P. In Ultrasound: Medical Applications, Biological Effects and Hazard Potential (eds M.H. Repacholi, M. Grondolfo, & A. Rindi) 275-306 (Plenum Pub. Corp., 1987).
Aryal, M., Vykhodtseva, N., Zhang, Y. Z. & McDannold, N. Multiple sessions of liposomal doxorubicin delivery via focused ultrasound mediated blood-brain barrier disruption: A safety study. J. Control Release 204, 60–69 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.02.033
McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., Raymond, S., Jolesz, F. A. & Hynynen, K. MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: Histological findings in rabbits. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 31, 1527–1537 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.07.010
Hynynen, K. et al. Focal disruption of the blood–brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. J. Neurosurgery 105, 445–454 (2006).
doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.105.3.445
Kobus, T., Vykhodtseva, N., Pilatou, M., Zhang, Y. & McDannold, N. Safety Validation of Repeated Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Using Focused Ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol (2015).
Chopra, R., Vykhodtseva, N. & Hynynen, K. Influence of exposure time and pressure amplitude on blood-brain-barrier opening using transcranial ultrasound exposures. ACS Chem. Neurosci 1, 391–398 (2010).
doi: 10.1021/cn9000445
Kovacs, Z. I. et al. Disrupting the blood-brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 114, E75–E84 (2017).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614777114
McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N. & Hynynen, K. Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity. Phys. Med. Biol 51, 793–807 (2006).
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/4/003
Arvanitis, C. D., Livingstone, M. S., Vykhodtseva, N. & McDannold, N. Controlled ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption using passive acoustic emissions monitoring. Plos One 7, e45783 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045783
Tung, Y. S. et al. In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice. Phys Med Biol 55, 6141–6155 (2010).
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/007
Sun, T. et al. Acoustic cavitation-based monitoring of the reversibility and permeability of ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening. Phys. Med. Biol 60, 9079–9094 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/23/9079
Sun, T. et al. Closed-loop control of targeted ultrasound drug delivery across the blood-brain/tumor barriers in a rat glioma model. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 114, E10281–E10290 (2017).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713328114
O’Reilly, M. A. & Hynynen, K. Blood-Brain Barrier: Real-time Feedback-controlled Focused Ultrasound Disruption by Using an Acoustic Emissions-based Controller. Radiology 263, 96–106 (2012).
doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111417
Jortner, B. S. The return of the dark neuron. A histological artifact complicating contemporary neurotoxicologic evaluation. Neurotoxicology 27, 628–634 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.002
Vredenburgh, J. J., Desjardins, A., Reardon, D. A. & Friedman, H. S. Experience with irinotecan for the treatment of malignant glioma. Neuro. Oncol 11, 80–91 (2009).
doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-075
Jakobsen, J. N., Hasselbalch, B., Stockhausen, M. T., Lassen, U. & Poulsen, H. S. Irinotecan and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother 12, 825–833 (2011).
doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.566558
Vredenburgh, J. J. et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J. Clin. Oncol 25, 4722–4729 (2007).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2440
Wang, W. et al. Effective conversion of irinotecan to SN-38 after intratumoral drug delivery to an intracranial murine glioma model in vivo. Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg 114, 689–694 (2011).
doi: 10.3171/2010.2.JNS09719
Choi, S. A. et al. Human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells: characteristics and therapeutic potential as cellular vehicles for prodrug gene therapy against brainstem gliomas. Eur J Cancer 48, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.033 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.033 pubmed: 21664124
Staedtke, V. et al. Clostridium novyi-NT can cause regression of orthotopically implanted glioblastomas in rats. Oncotarget 6, 5536–5546, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3627 (2015).
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3627 pubmed: 25849940 pmcid: 4467385
Barth, R. F. & Kaur, B. Rat brain tumor models in experimental neuro-oncology: the C6, 9L, T9, RG2, F98, BT4C, RT-2 and CNS-1 gliomas. J Neurooncol 94, 299–312 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9875-7
O’Reilly, M. A., Muller, A. & Hynynen, K. Ultrasound insertion loss of rat parietal bone appears to be proportional to animal mass at submegahertz frequencies. Ultrasound Med Biol 37, 1930–1937 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.08.001
Rivory, L. P. & Robert, J. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous quantitation of the carboxylate and lactone forms of the camptothecin derivative irinotecan, CPT-11, and its metabolite SN-38 in plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed Appl 661, 133–141 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0378-4347(94)00340-8
Fennessy, F. M. et al. Practical considerations in T1 mapping of prostate for dynamic contrast enhancement pharmacokinetic analyses. Magn Reson. Imaging 30, 1224–1233 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.011

Auteurs

Nathan McDannold (N)

Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. njm@bwh.harvard.edu.

Jeffrey G Supko (JG)

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Alexandra J Golby (AJ)

Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

David A Reardon (DA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH