Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Study From the Pan-London Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.
Acute Coronary Syndrome
/ mortality
Age Factors
Aged
Comorbidity
Coronary Artery Bypass
/ adverse effects
Coronary Artery Disease
/ mortality
Female
Humans
London
Male
Middle Aged
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Registries
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
coronary artery bypass graft surgery
percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 06 2020
16 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
9
3
2021
entrez:
2
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Limited information exists regarding procedural success and clinical outcomes in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We sought to compare outcomes in patients undergoing PCI with or without CABG. Methods and Results This was an observational cohort study of 123 780 consecutive PCI procedures from the Pan-London (UK) PCI registry from 2005 to 2015. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 3.0 years (interquartile range, 1.2-4.6 years). A total of 12 641(10.2%) patients had a history of previous CABG, of whom 29.3% (n=3703) underwent PCI to native vessels and 70.7% (n=8938) to bypass grafts. There were significant differences in the demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics of these groups. The risk of mortality during follow-up was significantly higher in patients with prior CABG (23.2%;
Identifiants
pubmed: 32475202
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014409
pmc: PMC7429029
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e014409Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2014-07-008
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-1216-20028
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003151
pubmed: 27069103
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):844-50
pubmed: 21851896
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e014409
pubmed: 32475202
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Sep;38(3):659-65
pubmed: 11527613
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 15;28(6):1493-9
pubmed: 8917263
Am Heart J. 2001 Sep;142(3):452-9
pubmed: 11526358
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:563-569
pubmed: 27875735
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):884-93
pubmed: 27085582
Am J Cardiol. 2003 May 15;91(10):1250-4
pubmed: 12745114
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):204-212
pubmed: 30165435
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Apr-Jun;10(2):103-9
pubmed: 19327672
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Sep;28(3):616-26
pubmed: 8772748
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Aug 15;68(5):467-71
pubmed: 1872273
Heart. 2011 Aug;97(16):1293-7
pubmed: 21719554
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Dec 4;40(11):1968-75
pubmed: 12475457
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619
pubmed: 25173339
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;86(9):931-7
pubmed: 11053702
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar;3(3):343-51
pubmed: 20298996
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):253-7
pubmed: 20516502
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Dec 7;44(11):2149-56
pubmed: 15582312