Enablers and barriers of people with chronic musculoskeletal pain for engaging in telehealth interventions: protocol for a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Chronic pain
Internet
Musculoskeletal
Protocol
Telehealth
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 05 2020
31 05 2020
Historique:
received:
20
09
2019
accepted:
18
05
2020
entrez:
2
6
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
25
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chronic musculoskeletal pain represents an enormous burden in society. Best-practice care for chronic musculoskeletal pain suggests adoption of self-management strategies. Telehealth interventions (e.g., videoconferencing) are a promising approach to promote self-management and have the potential to overcome geographical barriers between patient and care providers. Understanding patient perspectives will inform and identify practical challenges towards applying the self-management strategies delivered via telehealth to everyday lives. The aim of this study is to synthesize the perceptions of individuals with musculoskeletal pain with regards to enablers and barriers to engaging in telehealth interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain self-management. A systematic review of qualitative studies will be performed based on searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, and PsycINFO databases. Screening of identified titles will be conducted by two independent investigators. Data extraction will retrieve detailed qualitative information from selected articles. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist will be used for critical appraisal of included studies, and the level of confidence in the findings will be assessed using the confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual). A thematic synthesis approach will be used to derive analytical themes. This review will systematically identify, synthesize, and present enablers and barriers reported by people with musculoskeletal pain to engage in telehealth interventions. The review will provide information required to support the design and improvement of telehealth services. PROSPERO CRD42019136148.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chronic musculoskeletal pain represents an enormous burden in society. Best-practice care for chronic musculoskeletal pain suggests adoption of self-management strategies. Telehealth interventions (e.g., videoconferencing) are a promising approach to promote self-management and have the potential to overcome geographical barriers between patient and care providers. Understanding patient perspectives will inform and identify practical challenges towards applying the self-management strategies delivered via telehealth to everyday lives. The aim of this study is to synthesize the perceptions of individuals with musculoskeletal pain with regards to enablers and barriers to engaging in telehealth interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain self-management.
METHODS
A systematic review of qualitative studies will be performed based on searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, and PsycINFO databases. Screening of identified titles will be conducted by two independent investigators. Data extraction will retrieve detailed qualitative information from selected articles. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist will be used for critical appraisal of included studies, and the level of confidence in the findings will be assessed using the confidence in the evidence from reviews of qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual). A thematic synthesis approach will be used to derive analytical themes.
DISCUSSION
This review will systematically identify, synthesize, and present enablers and barriers reported by people with musculoskeletal pain to engage in telehealth interventions. The review will provide information required to support the design and improvement of telehealth services.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42019136148.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32475341
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01390-x
pii: 10.1186/s13643-020-01390-x
pmc: PMC7262761
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
122Références
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Apr;49(4):212-215
pubmed: 30931733
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Dec;69(12):1834-1844
pubmed: 28217864
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 30;6:e5846
pubmed: 30397549
Pain. 2015 Jun;156(6):1003-7
pubmed: 25844555
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):14
pubmed: 29384077
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43
pubmed: 22829486
Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 28;5:15
pubmed: 26822481
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):10
pubmed: 29384082
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 28;19(4):e142
pubmed: 28455277
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jul/Aug;42(4):488-498
pubmed: 28570436
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(2):79-86
pubmed: 30826805
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):4
pubmed: 29384080
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):9
pubmed: 29384078
Pain Manag. 2015;5(3):207-14
pubmed: 25971644
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):13
pubmed: 29384081
Clin Rehabil. 2017 May;31(5):625-638
pubmed: 27141087
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259
pubmed: 28919117
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004563
pubmed: 16856050
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):25-30
pubmed: 21075802
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Jan;24(1):44-50
pubmed: 27681227
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 10;19(11):e385
pubmed: 29127076
J Pain Res. 2019 Aug 12;12:2457-2472
pubmed: 31496788
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):380-387
pubmed: 26672402
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
Pain. 2017 Jul;158(7):1289-1301
pubmed: 28394850
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2
pubmed: 29384079
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 15;16(1):120
pubmed: 27630020
Interact J Med Res. 2017 Dec 12;6(2):e24
pubmed: 29233802
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383
pubmed: 29573872
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):453-462
pubmed: 28241215
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1260-1344
pubmed: 28919118