Electrophysiological Measurement of Emotion and Somatic State Affecting Ambiguity Decision: Evidences From SCRs, ERPs, and HR.
Iowa gambling task
event-related potentials
heart rate
skin conductance responses
somatic marker hypothesis
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
17
12
2019
accepted:
14
04
2020
entrez:
2
6
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Twenty-three years ago, the Somatic Marker Hypothesis (SMH) proposed by Damasio was introduced to explain the role of emotion in decision-making, and provided a unique neuroanatomical framework for decision-making and its influence by emotion. The core idea of the SMH is that decision-making is a process that is affected by somatic state signals, including those that express themselves in emotion and feeling. In order to verify the SMH, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) was originally designed by Bechara et al. and the skin conductance responses (SCRs) was recorded during the IGT. The initial confirmatory results showed that normal subjects would generate anticipatory SCRs when they received reward or punishment, but patients of the VMPFC lesion entirely failed to generate anticipatory SCRs prior to their selection of a card. With the further development of the SMH-related researches, other electrophysiological methods of measuring somatic state was gradually used to test the SMH, including event-related potentials (ERPs), and heart rate (HR). In this mini review article, we summarize the extant electrophysiological research on the SMH and decision-making under ambiguity, propose an integrative perspective for employing different electrophysiological measurement methods, and indicate the application of electrophysiological measurement based on the SMH in daily social decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32477219
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00899
pmc: PMC7240102
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
899Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Xu and Huang.
Références
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Jan;47(1):65-74
pubmed: 12543447
Cogn Process. 2015 Sep;16 Suppl 1:125-9
pubmed: 26224278
Biol Psychol. 2003 Dec;65(1):81-8
pubmed: 14638290
Neuron. 2007 Aug 16;55(4):545-55
pubmed: 17698008
J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):159-63
pubmed: 9103728
Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):624-39
pubmed: 11872618
Behav Brain Funct. 2008 Mar 19;4:13
pubmed: 18353176
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Oct;19(5):1097-1112
pubmed: 31493212
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):939-43
pubmed: 14998708
Psychophysiology. 2004 Jul;41(4):531-40
pubmed: 15189476
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 25;5:1350
pubmed: 25505440
Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):353-8
pubmed: 18191013
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Mar;10(2):239-45
pubmed: 15012844
Science. 1997 Feb 28;275(5304):1293-5
pubmed: 9036851
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1103-4; author reply 1104
pubmed: 12403997
Biol Psychol. 2006 Feb;71(2):148-54
pubmed: 16005561
Neuroreport. 2003 Oct 27;14(15):1993-6
pubmed: 14561936
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 15;7:776
pubmed: 24298248
J Neurosci Psychol Econ. 2011;4(2):85-94
pubmed: 21818407
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Aug;47(10):2120-4
pubmed: 19427005
Biol Psychol. 2017 Feb;123:286-293
pubmed: 27984085
Nat Neurosci. 2011 Sep 18;14(10):1338-44
pubmed: 21926982
Sci Am. 1994 Oct;271(4):144
pubmed: 7939563
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;118(3):633-44
pubmed: 17208045
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Jun;46(6):1957-65
pubmed: 15914609
Psychol Med. 2011 Sep;41(9):1917-27
pubmed: 21262034
Psychophysiology. 2014 Aug;51(8):805-9
pubmed: 24773408
Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 24;9(10):
pubmed: 31554273
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 9;101(45):16075-80
pubmed: 15501919
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 01;11(8):e0158875
pubmed: 27479484
Psychol Aging. 2008 Jun;23(2):392-8
pubmed: 18573012
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0130871
pubmed: 26086196
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1413-20
pubmed: 8941953
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jul;61(1):19-25
pubmed: 16426691
Neuron. 2008 Sep 25;59(6):1037-50
pubmed: 18817740
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1690-705
pubmed: 11992657
Brain. 2000 Nov;123 ( Pt 11):2189-202
pubmed: 11050020
Psychophysiology. 2002 Mar;39(2):246-53
pubmed: 12212675
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 04;4:687
pubmed: 24109462
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 25;8:2353
pubmed: 29422876
Circ Res. 1985 Sep;57(3):461-9
pubmed: 4028348
Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):7-15
pubmed: 8039375
Addict Behav. 2014 Jun;39(6):1026-32
pubmed: 24629323
Biol Psychol. 2013 Oct;94(2):235-41
pubmed: 23886960
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Apr;149(3):267-75
pubmed: 12632229
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 03;5:684
pubmed: 25071654
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002 May;26(5):682-91
pubmed: 11927193
J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 1;19(13):5473-81
pubmed: 10377356
J Med Eng Technol. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(6):479-84
pubmed: 18663635
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jan 03;7:218
pubmed: 24427126
Neuroimage. 2012 Jun;61(2):371-85
pubmed: 22227136
Psychophysiology. 1983 Jan;20(1):88-94
pubmed: 6828617
MAGMA. 2005 Mar;18(1):41-50
pubmed: 15700133
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Dec;6(4):277-90
pubmed: 17458443
Psychophysiology. 1988 Jul;25(4):373-91
pubmed: 3051073
Genes Brain Behav. 2012 Jun;11(4):398-403
pubmed: 22348680
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb;16(1):23-36
pubmed: 26383904
Science. 2002 Mar 22;295(5563):2279-82
pubmed: 11910116
Brain Cogn. 2011 Apr;75(3):273-80
pubmed: 21306813
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Sep;6(3):190-200
pubmed: 17243355
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):259-65
pubmed: 19808059
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Feb 15;640:93-98
pubmed: 28093302
Psychophysiology. 2014 Aug;51(8):734-45
pubmed: 24758702
Cereb Cortex. 1996 Mar-Apr;6(2):215-25
pubmed: 8670652
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100486
pubmed: 24950233
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 06;6:204
pubmed: 22783182
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(8):1315-24
pubmed: 16513144
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(10):1675-89
pubmed: 11992656