The Snowmelt Niche Differentiates Three Microbial Life Strategies That Influence Soil Nitrogen Availability During and After Winter.
life history strategy
snowmelt
soil archaea and bacteria
soil fungi
soil nitrogen
watershed
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
08
11
2019
accepted:
14
04
2020
entrez:
2
6
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soil microbial biomass can reach its annual maximum pool size beneath the winter snowpack and is known to decline abruptly following snowmelt in seasonally snow-covered ecosystems. Observed differences in winter versus summer microbial taxonomic composition also suggests that phylogenetically conserved traits may permit winter- versus summer-adapted microorganisms to occupy distinct niches. In this study, we sought to identify archaea, bacteria, and fungi that are associated with the soil microbial bloom overwinter and the subsequent biomass collapse following snowmelt at a high-altitude watershed in central Colorado, United States. Archaea, bacteria, and fungi were categorized into three life strategies (Winter-Adapted, Snowmelt-Specialist, Spring-Adapted) based upon changes in abundance during winter, the snowmelt period, and after snowmelt in spring. We calculated indices of phylogenetic relatedness (archaea and bacteria) or assigned functional attributes (fungi) to organisms within life strategies to infer whether phylogenetically conserved traits differentiate Winter-Adapted, Snowmelt-Specialist, and Spring-Adapted groups. We observed that the soil microbial bloom was correlated in time with a pulse of snowmelt infiltration, which commenced 65 days prior to soils becoming snow-free. A pulse of nitrogen (N, as nitrate) occurred after snowmelt, along with a collapse in the microbial biomass pool size, and an increased abundance of nitrifying archaea and bacteria (e.g., Thaumarchaeota, Nitrospirae). Winter- and Spring-Adapted archaea and bacteria were phylogenetically clustered, suggesting that phylogenetically conserved traits allow Winter- and Spring-Adapted archaea and bacteria to occupy distinct niches. In contrast, Snowmelt-Specialist archaea and bacteria were phylogenetically overdispersed, suggesting that the key mechanism(s) of the microbial biomass crash are likely to be density-dependent (e.g., trophic interactions, competitive exclusion) and affect organisms across a broad phylogenetic spectrum. Saprotrophic fungi were the dominant functional group across fungal life strategies, however, ectomycorrhizal fungi experienced a large increase in abundance in spring. If well-coupled plant-mycorrhizal phenology currently buffers ecosystem N losses in spring, then changes in snowmelt timing may alter ecosystem N retention potential. Overall, we observed that snowmelt separates three distinct soil niches that are occupied by ecologically distinct groups of microorganisms. This ecological differentiation is of biogeochemical importance, particularly with respect to the mobilization of nitrogen during winter, before and after snowmelt.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32477299
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00871
pmc: PMC7242569
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
871Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Sorensen, Beller, Bill, Bouskill, Hubbard, Karaoz, Polussa, Steltzer, Wang, Williams, Wu and Brodie.
Références
ISME J. 2020 Jan;14(1):1-9
pubmed: 31554911
Nat Microbiol. 2016 Sep 12;1(11):16160
pubmed: 27617693
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Nat Microbiol. 2018 Apr;3(4):470-480
pubmed: 29556109
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jun;21(6):2349-56
pubmed: 25504893
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 15;26(2):266-7
pubmed: 19914921
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 10;5(3):e9490
pubmed: 20224823
Science. 1995 Feb 10;267(5199):876-80
pubmed: 17813919
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Oct;20(10):3256-69
pubmed: 24599697
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1354-64
pubmed: 17601128
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 6;115(6):1215-1220
pubmed: 29358384
Science. 2003 Sep 5;301(5638):1359-61
pubmed: 12958355
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 May;70(5):2867-79
pubmed: 15128545
Science. 2009 May 15;324(5929):886-7
pubmed: 19443769
Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009 Apr;1(2):162-6
pubmed: 23765747
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 31;7:744
pubmed: 27303369
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan;3(1):45-52
pubmed: 30532048
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jun 1;26(11):1463-4
pubmed: 20395285
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 31;8(1):1223
pubmed: 29089496
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1379-85
pubmed: 17601130
Ecology. 2016 Feb;97(2):372-82
pubmed: 27145612
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
pubmed: 17586664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):10931-6
pubmed: 22715291
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Apr;23(4):1610-1625
pubmed: 27808458
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Apr 02;11(4):e1004198
pubmed: 25838110
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2596-607
pubmed: 27282323
Ecology. 2015 Feb;96(2):355-61
pubmed: 26240857
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Jan;8(1):15-25
pubmed: 19946288
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Sep;18(9):484-91
pubmed: 23756036
Mol Ecol. 2016 Aug;25(16):4059-74
pubmed: 27357176
Ecology. 2007 Jun;88(6):1386-94
pubmed: 17601131
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 12;365(1555):3177-86
pubmed: 20819811
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2017 Apr 12;81(2):
pubmed: 28404790
BMJ. 2011;343:d2304
pubmed: 22803193
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 08;368(1624):20120489
pubmed: 23836793
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2009;35(3):157-68
pubmed: 19624252
Ecology. 2008 Feb;89(2):353-62
pubmed: 18409425
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(5):1576-85
pubmed: 17220268
New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):681-694
pubmed: 22943495
Environ Microbiol. 2020 Aug;22(8):3494-3504
pubmed: 32510726
Nature. 2016 Jun 29;535(7611):241-5
pubmed: 27362222
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017 Mar 1;93(3):
pubmed: 28115400
Ecology. 2014 Jan;95(1):110-22
pubmed: 24649651
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Microb Ecol. 2012 Jul;64(1):79-90
pubmed: 22234510