Explorative study of emerging blood biomarkers in progressive multiple sclerosis (EmBioProMS): Design of a prospective observational multicentre pilot study.
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
revised:
04
05
2020
accepted:
17
05
2020
entrez:
2
6
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Defining clinical and subclinical progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. Patient history, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) all have shortcomings and may underestimate disease dynamics. Emerging serum biomarkers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) proved useful in many cross-sectional studies. However, longitudinal data on patients with progressive MS is scarce. To assess whether the serum biomarkers GFAP and NfL might differentiate between patients with progressive vs. non-progressive disease stages and predict the disease course according to the Lublin criteria. EmBioProMS is a pilot, observational, prospective, multicentric study funded by the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG). 200 patients with MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria and history of relapse-independent progression at any time (progressive MS, PMS), younger than 65 years, and with EDSS ≤ 6.5 will be recruited in 6 centres in Germany. At baseline, month 6, and 18, medical history, EDSS, Nine-Hole-Peg-Test (9-HPT), Timed-25-Foot-Walk-Test (T-25FW), Symbol-Digit-Modalities-Test (SDMT), serum GFAP, and NfL, MRI (at least baseline and month 18) and optional optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed. Disease progression before and during the study is defined by confirmed EDSS progression, increase by ≥ 20% in 9-HPT or T-25FW time. This longitudinal multicentre study will reveal to what extent the prediction of disease progression in patients with PMS will be improved by the analysis of serum biomarkers in conjunction with routine clinical data and neuroimaging measures.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Defining clinical and subclinical progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging. Patient history, expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) all have shortcomings and may underestimate disease dynamics. Emerging serum biomarkers such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) proved useful in many cross-sectional studies. However, longitudinal data on patients with progressive MS is scarce.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether the serum biomarkers GFAP and NfL might differentiate between patients with progressive vs. non-progressive disease stages and predict the disease course according to the Lublin criteria.
METHODS
METHODS
EmBioProMS is a pilot, observational, prospective, multicentric study funded by the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG). 200 patients with MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria and history of relapse-independent progression at any time (progressive MS, PMS), younger than 65 years, and with EDSS ≤ 6.5 will be recruited in 6 centres in Germany. At baseline, month 6, and 18, medical history, EDSS, Nine-Hole-Peg-Test (9-HPT), Timed-25-Foot-Walk-Test (T-25FW), Symbol-Digit-Modalities-Test (SDMT), serum GFAP, and NfL, MRI (at least baseline and month 18) and optional optical coherence tomography (OCT) will be performed. Disease progression before and during the study is defined by confirmed EDSS progression, increase by ≥ 20% in 9-HPT or T-25FW time.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This longitudinal multicentre study will reveal to what extent the prediction of disease progression in patients with PMS will be improved by the analysis of serum biomarkers in conjunction with routine clinical data and neuroimaging measures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32478196
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100574
pii: S2451-8654(20)30058-2
pii: 100574
pmc: PMC7251538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100574Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AA received research funding from DMSG and travel grants from 10.13039/100005614Biogen, AS has received institutional research grants from 10.13039/100004334Merck and 10.13039/100004336Novartis, all outside the submitted work. MS received consulting and/or speaker honoraria as well as travel reimbursements from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme and TEVA and research funding from the Hertha-Nathorff-Program and the 10.13039/501100008977University of Ulm. MK received financial support from 10.13039/100005614Biogen, 10.13039/100006436Celgene, 10.13039/100004334Merck, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004337Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. MCK receives financial support from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Celgene and Roche. JH reports personal fees and non-financial support from Merck, Novartis, Roche, Santhera, Biogen, Alexion, Sanofi Genzyme, and non-financial support of the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation, all outside the submitted work. JH is (partially) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Numbers 01ZZ1603[A-D] and 01ZZ1804[A-H] (DIFUTURE)). TK has received speaker honoraria including advisory boards from Bayer Healthcare, Teva Pharma, Merck, Novartis Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, Roche Pharma and Biogen as well as grant support from Novartis and Chugai Pharma in the past. IK has received speaker honoraria and travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi Genzyme, Roche; speaker honoraria from Mylan; travel funding from the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation; consulted for Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chugai, IQVIA, Novartis, Merck, Roche; received research support from Chugai, Diamed; all outside the submitted work. UKZ received travel compensation for research meetings from Aventis, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene as well as speakers fee from Almirall, Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. TF reports personal fees for consultancies (including data monitoring committees) in the past three years from Bayer, BiosenseWebster, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardialysis, CSL Behring, Sankyo, Enanta, Feldmann Patent Attorneys, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, IQVIA, Janssen, Mediconomics, Novartis, Penumbra, Roche, SGS, and Vifor; all outside the submitted work. ACL received personal fees from Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Desitin Pharma, Syneos Health, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, and Mitsubishi Pharma for consultancy services. UZ received financial support from Biogen Idec GmbH, Bayer Vital GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb GmbH, Pfizer, CorTec GmbH, Medtronic GmbH, and research support from European Research Council, DFG, BMBF, Servier, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. HT reports personal fees and/or research grants from Fresenius Medical Care GmbH and Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, DMSG, and BMBF. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):801-13
pubmed: 26190464
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Oct 16;5(12):1478-1491
pubmed: 30564615
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 May 10;4(4):e358
pubmed: 28680915
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Mar 13;5(3):e449
pubmed: 29552598
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019 Apr 08;6(3):e555
pubmed: 31119188
Eur Neurol. 2014;72 Suppl 1:1-5
pubmed: 25278115
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Nov;36:101414
pubmed: 31574404
Mult Scler. 2019 Nov 4;:1352458519885613
pubmed: 31680621
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Oct;16(10):797-812
pubmed: 28920886
Neurology. 2016 Jun 14;86(24):2303-9
pubmed: 27225223
Acta Neurol Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):16-21
pubmed: 31350854
Neurology. 2019 Sep 24;93(13):e1299-e1311
pubmed: 31471502
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2018 Jul 16;5(5):e480
pubmed: 30038948
Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):403-413
pubmed: 27986875
Lancet. 2018 Mar 31;391(10127):1263-1273
pubmed: 29576505
Mult Scler. 2015 Feb;21(2):163-70
pubmed: 24948688
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Feb;14(2):75-93
pubmed: 29326424
Mult Scler. 2020 Feb;26(2):210-219
pubmed: 30570436
Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 26;10:280
pubmed: 30972011
Lancet Neurol. 2016 May;15(6):574-84
pubmed: 27011339
Mult Scler. 2019 Oct;25(11):1462-1471
pubmed: 30141723
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 4;8(1):14798
pubmed: 30287870
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 Jun;28(6):595-9
pubmed: 20495550
J Neuroinflammation. 2018 Jul 18;15(1):209
pubmed: 30021640
Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Jun;24(3):255-61
pubmed: 21455068
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 26;19:466-475
pubmed: 29984155
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):209-220
pubmed: 28002688
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Sep 1;75(9):1071-1079
pubmed: 29710121
Mult Scler. 2019 Oct 31;:1352458519882279
pubmed: 31668116
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 May;22:77-82
pubmed: 29605802
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;90(12):1324-1330
pubmed: 31611264
Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):857-870
pubmed: 28512753
Ann Neurol. 2007 Jan;61(1):14-24
pubmed: 17262850
Ann Neurol. 2009 Oct;66(4):460-71
pubmed: 19847908