Current status of imaging diagnosis in the transplanted kidney. A review of the literature with a special focus on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

acute humoral rejection acute rejection acute tubular necrosis contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging diagnosis kidney transplantation time-intensity curve

Journal

Medicine and pharmacy reports
ISSN: 2668-0572
Titre abrégé: Med Pharm Rep
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101742144

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 05 12 2019
revised: 27 01 2020
accepted: 17 02 2020
entrez: 2 6 2020
pubmed: 2 6 2020
medline: 2 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ultrasonographic scanning is currently the most widespread imaging diagnostic procedure. The method provides real-time morphological, vascular and elastographic information in a non-invasive manner. In recent years, harmonic vascular examination has become accessible using intravenous contrast agents. In urological pathology, this procedure is used in the detection and evaluation of vascular and ischemic complications, in the classification of complex cysts according to the Bosniak system, also in the renal lesions with uncertain etiology and in acute pyelonephritis for the detection of abscesses. The contrast agent (SonoVue) is angiospecific and can be used in patients transplanted immediately after surgery without adverse effects or impaired renal function. Thus, it is desirable to be used in the nephrological pathology of the renal graft and to develop diagnostic models based on the evaluation of renal microvascularization, as well as the quantitative data resulting from the graphical representation of the specific parameters. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current state of the literature regarding the place and role of contrast substance ultrasound in the early diagnosis of acute renal graft dysfunction and to make a differential diagnosis of this pathological entity. This review quantifies the role of contrast ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute complications of the renal graft. The research was conducted based on the databases PubMed, MedScape, Cochrane, according to the search criteria such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound + kidney transplant, "time intensity curves" + "kidney transplant", filtered for the period 2004-2018. In the nephrological pathology of the renal graft, contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a valuable tool, superior to Doppler ultrasound in predicting the evolution of the renal graft, identifying very small early defects in renal microvascularization. A number of studies succeeded in identifying acute graft dysfunction, some of which establish its etiology - humoral rejection versus acute tubular necrosis. On the other hand, the contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters do not have the ability to distinguish between cellular and humoral rejection. If, at present, the histopathological examination is the only one that can differentiate with certainty the cause of acute renal graft dysfunction, we consider that contrast-enhanced ultrasound, as a non-invasive imaging technique, opens a favorable perspective for increasing the survival of the renal graft and decreasing the complications in the renal transplant. The combination of other ultrasound techniques, together with contrast-enhanced ultrasound, could lead to the development of new diagnostic models.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32478319
doi: 10.15386/mpr-1536
pii: cm-93-133
pmc: PMC7243885
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

133-144

Références

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 Sep;32(9):1369-75
pubmed: 16965977
Am J Transplant. 2018 Feb;18(2):293-307
pubmed: 29243394
Transpl Int. 2015 Feb;28(2):136-43
pubmed: 25205033
Nucl Med Biol. 1998 May;25(4):317-22
pubmed: 9639291
J Ultrasound. 2014 Apr 11;18(2):101-7
pubmed: 26191097
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):77-82
pubmed: 29630540
Eur Radiol. 2005 Dec;15 Suppl 5:E109-16
pubmed: 18637238
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Aug;71(2):288-95
pubmed: 18524518
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3315-20
pubmed: 22290990
Eur Radiol. 2017 Nov;27(11):4525-4531
pubmed: 28593430
Ultraschall Med. 2008 Aug;29(4):418-23
pubmed: 17315111
Front Physiol. 2017 May 16;8:296
pubmed: 28559850
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011 Nov;7(4):255-282
pubmed: 22308105
Kidney Int. 2014 Apr;85(4):768-78
pubmed: 24067433
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Oct;21(10):2921-9
pubmed: 16822787
Transplant Proc. 2009 May;41(4):1214-5
pubmed: 19460520
Iran J Radiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):e11492
pubmed: 24693296
Clin Kidney J. 2017 Feb;10(1):97-105
pubmed: 28643821
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16(1):310-6
pubmed: 26302136
World J Urol. 2011 Aug;29(4):547-53
pubmed: 21387102
Ann Transplant. 2011 Jan-Mar;16(1):48-53
pubmed: 21436774
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Feb;34(1):11-29
pubmed: 23129518
Ultraschall Med. 2012 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S31-8
pubmed: 22723027
Transplant Proc. 2014 Dec;46(10):3352-7
pubmed: 25498050
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:595873
pubmed: 24455707
Kidney Int. 2005 Aug;68(2):878-85
pubmed: 16014069
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):319-21
pubmed: 23929378
Transplant Proc. 2010 Dec;42(10):4026-9
pubmed: 21168617
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(6):e2816
pubmed: 26871853
Nefrologia. 2014;34(1):115-9
pubmed: 24463868
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18399-405
pubmed: 26770444
Transplantation. 2019 Feb;103(2):412-419
pubmed: 29762458
Clin Radiol. 2009 Nov;64(11):1081-7
pubmed: 19822241
Rofo. 2004 Apr;176(4):472-7
pubmed: 15088169
Transpl Int. 2016 Feb;29(2):167-72
pubmed: 26284692
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Apr 15;9(2):110-126
pubmed: 31139495
Clin Kidney J. 2015 Oct;8(5):606-14
pubmed: 26413289
Radiol Med. 2007 Feb;112(1):64-73
pubmed: 17310290
J Hypertens. 2014 Jan;32(1):149-53
pubmed: 24172238
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Apr;59(4):377-81
pubmed: 16461569
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004 Dec;21(4):235-7
pubmed: 21331134
J Ultrasound Med. 2017 Aug;36(8):1607-1615
pubmed: 28370148
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Jan 10;8(2):110-21
pubmed: 22231130
J Ultrasound Med. 2007 May;26(5):615-33
pubmed: 17460004
Transplant Proc. 2015 Sep;47(7):2139-41
pubmed: 26361662
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Sep;201(3):W479-86
pubmed: 23971480
Transplant Proc. 2014 Nov;46(9):2972-4
pubmed: 25420803
Clujul Med. 2014;87(1):27-9
pubmed: 26527992
Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9 Suppl 3:S1-155
pubmed: 19845597
Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:62
pubmed: 23326793
Ultraschall Med. 2018 Apr;39(2):e2-e44
pubmed: 29510439
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Feb 09;28:6-10
pubmed: 29552340
Transplantation. 2015 Mar;99(3):636-41
pubmed: 25119133
Caspian J Intern Med. 2019 Winter;10(1):11-15
pubmed: 30858936
Ultraschall Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):340-4
pubmed: 22923261

Auteurs

Maria Ramona Bădulescu (MR)

Hemodialysis Department, 5 Medical Clinic and Urology Department. Clinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Mihai Adrian Socaciu (MA)

Medical Imaging Department, "Octavian Fodor" Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Tudor Moisoiu (T)

Urology Department, Clinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Alexandra Andries (A)

Medical Imaging Department, "Octavian Fodor" Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Medical Imaging Department, "Prof dr. Ion Chiricuta" Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Gheorghiţă Iacob (G)

Morphology Department, Clinical Institute of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Cluj-Napoca. Romania.

Radu Badea (R)

Medical Imaging Department, "Octavian Fodor" Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Classifications MeSH