Factors Influencing Physician Practices' Adoption of Behavioral Health Integration in the United States: A Qualitative Study.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 07 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 2 6 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 2 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Behavioral health integration is uncommon among U.S. physician practices despite recent policy changes that may encourage its adoption. To describe factors influencing physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration. Semistructured interviews with leaders and clinicians from physician practices that adopted behavioral health integration, supplemented by contextual interviews with experts and vendors in behavioral health integration. 30 physician practices, sampled for diversity on specialty, size, affiliation with parent organizations, geographic location, and behavioral health integration model (collaborative or co-located). 47 physician practice leaders and clinicians, 20 experts, and 5 vendors. Qualitative analysis (cyclical coding) of interview transcripts. Four overarching factors affecting physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration were identified. First, practices' motivations for integrating behavioral health care included expanding access to behavioral health services, improving other clinicians' abilities to respond to patients' behavioral health needs, and enhancing practice reputation. Second, practices tailored their implementation of behavioral health integration to local resources, financial incentives, and patient populations. Third, barriers to behavioral health integration included cultural differences and incomplete information flow between behavioral and nonbehavioral health clinicians and billing difficulties. Fourth, practices described the advantages and disadvantages of both fee-for-service and alternative payment models, and few reported positive financial returns. The practice sample was not nationally representative and excluded practices that did not implement or sustain behavioral health integration, potentially limiting generalizability. Practices currently using behavioral health integration face cultural, informational, and financial barriers to implementing and sustaining behavioral health integration. Tailored, context-specific technical support to guide practices' implementation and payment models that improve the business case for practices may enhance the dissemination and long-term sustainability of behavioral health integration. American Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Behavioral health integration is uncommon among U.S. physician practices despite recent policy changes that may encourage its adoption.
OBJECTIVE
To describe factors influencing physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration.
DESIGN
Semistructured interviews with leaders and clinicians from physician practices that adopted behavioral health integration, supplemented by contextual interviews with experts and vendors in behavioral health integration.
SETTING
30 physician practices, sampled for diversity on specialty, size, affiliation with parent organizations, geographic location, and behavioral health integration model (collaborative or co-located).
PARTICIPANTS
47 physician practice leaders and clinicians, 20 experts, and 5 vendors.
MEASUREMENTS
Qualitative analysis (cyclical coding) of interview transcripts.
RESULTS
Four overarching factors affecting physician practices' implementation of behavioral health integration were identified. First, practices' motivations for integrating behavioral health care included expanding access to behavioral health services, improving other clinicians' abilities to respond to patients' behavioral health needs, and enhancing practice reputation. Second, practices tailored their implementation of behavioral health integration to local resources, financial incentives, and patient populations. Third, barriers to behavioral health integration included cultural differences and incomplete information flow between behavioral and nonbehavioral health clinicians and billing difficulties. Fourth, practices described the advantages and disadvantages of both fee-for-service and alternative payment models, and few reported positive financial returns.
LIMITATION
The practice sample was not nationally representative and excluded practices that did not implement or sustain behavioral health integration, potentially limiting generalizability.
CONCLUSION
Practices currently using behavioral health integration face cultural, informational, and financial barriers to implementing and sustaining behavioral health integration. Tailored, context-specific technical support to guide practices' implementation and payment models that improve the business case for practices may enhance the dissemination and long-term sustainability of behavioral health integration.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
American Medical Association and The Commonwealth Fund.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32479169
doi: 10.7326/M20-0132
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

92-99

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Angèle Malâtre-Lansac (A)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.).

Charles C Engel (CC)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.).

Lea Xenakis (L)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.).

Lindsey Carlasare (L)

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.).

Kathleen Blake (K)

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.).

Carol Vargo (C)

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.).

Christopher Botts (C)

American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois (L.C., K.B., C.V., C.B.).

Peggy G Chen (PG)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California (A.M., C.C.E., L.X., P.G.C.).

Mark W Friedberg (MW)

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (M.W.F.).

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH