Microglia depletion rapidly and reversibly alters amyloid pathology by modification of plaque compaction and morphologies.
Alzheimer Disease
/ metabolism
Amyloid beta-Peptides
/ metabolism
Animals
Brain
/ drug effects
Disease Models, Animal
Mice, Transgenic
Microglia
/ metabolism
Organic Chemicals
/ pharmacology
Plaque, Amyloid
/ metabolism
Receptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
AD
Barrier
CSF1R
Inflammation
Microglia
Neuroprotection
Plaques
Journal
Neurobiology of disease
ISSN: 1095-953X
Titre abrégé: Neurobiol Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9500169
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
12
03
2020
revised:
18
05
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
pubmed:
2
6
2020
medline:
28
7
2021
entrez:
2
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a prominent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ)-containing extracellular plaques, accompanied by a microglial-mediated inflammatory response, that leads to cognitive decline. Microglia perform many disease-modifying functions such as phagocytosis of plaques, plaque compaction, and modulation of inflammation through the secretion of cytokines. Microglia are reliant upon colony-stimulating factor receptor-1 (CSF1R) activation for survival. In AD mouse models, chronic targeted depletion of microglia via CSF1R antagonism attenuates plaque formation in early disease but fails to alter plaque burden in late disease. It is unclear if acute depletion of microglia during the peak period of plaque deposition will alter disease pathogenesis, and if so, whether these effects are reversible upon microglial repopulation. To test this, we administered the CSF1R antagonist PLX5622 to the 5XFAD mouse model of AD at four months of age for approximately one month. In a subset of mice, the drug treatment was discontinued, and the mice were fed a control diet for an additional month. We evaluated plaque burden and composition, microgliosis, inflammatory marker expression, and neuritic dystrophy. In 5XFAD animals, CSF1R blockade for 28 days depleted microglia across brain regions by over 50%, suppressed microgliosis, and reduced plaque burden. In microglial-depleted AD animals, neuritic dystrophy was enhanced, and increased diffuse-like plaques and fewer compact-like plaques were observed. Removal of PLX5622 elicited microglial repopulation and subsequent plaque remodeling, resulting in more compact plaques predominating microglia-repopulated regions. We found that microglia limit diffuse plaques by maintaining compact-like plaque properties, thereby blocking the progression of neuritic dystrophy. Microglial repopulation reverses these effects. Collectively, we show that microglia are neuroprotective through maintenance of plaque compaction and morphologies during peak disease progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32479996
pii: S0969-9961(20)30231-X
doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104956
pmc: PMC7526856
mid: NIHMS1601566
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Amyloid beta-Peptides
0
Csf1r protein, mouse
0
Organic Chemicals
0
PLX5622
0
Receptors, Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104956Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG043522
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG050597
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RF1 AG051495
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):15112-23
pubmed: 23100432
J Exp Med. 2018 Mar 5;215(3):927-940
pubmed: 29444819
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 17;35(24):9173-81
pubmed: 26085639
Trends Immunol. 2015 Oct;36(10):625-636
pubmed: 26431940
Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 21;10(1):3758
pubmed: 31434879
J Exp Med. 2019 Nov 4;216(11):2546-2561
pubmed: 31601677
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0122912
pubmed: 25849463
Mol Neurodegener. 2018 Mar 1;13(1):11
pubmed: 29490706
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 15;83(4):377-387
pubmed: 29169609
Nature. 2019 Feb;566(7744):388-392
pubmed: 30760929
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1276-1290.e17
pubmed: 28602351
Mol Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;25(2):351-367
pubmed: 31772305
Brain. 2016 Mar;139(Pt 3):891-907
pubmed: 26747862
J Neuroinflammation. 2015 Aug 01;12:139
pubmed: 26232154
Front Neurosci. 2017 Dec 12;11:680
pubmed: 29311768
Neuron. 2014 Apr 16;82(2):380-97
pubmed: 24742461
Immunity. 2015 Jul 21;43(1):92-106
pubmed: 26163371
Immunity. 2017 Sep 19;47(3):566-581.e9
pubmed: 28930663
Nat Immunol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1048-1058
pubmed: 30250185
Neuron. 2016 May 18;90(4):724-39
pubmed: 27196974
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 29;6:6176
pubmed: 25630253
Mol Neurodegener. 2017 May 26;12(1):43
pubmed: 28549481
Nature. 2017 Dec 20;552(7685):355-361
pubmed: 29293211
EMBO Rep. 2017 Jul;18(7):1186-1198
pubmed: 28483841
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Feb;22(2):191-204
pubmed: 30617257
Glia. 2017 Jun;65(6):931-944
pubmed: 28251674
J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 4;26(40):10129-40
pubmed: 17021169
Brain. 2016 Apr;139(Pt 4):1265-81
pubmed: 26921617
Bio Protoc. 2016 Apr 20;6(8):
pubmed: 28516120
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Apr;21(4):530-540
pubmed: 29472620
Mol Neurodegener. 2018 Jun 1;13(1):29
pubmed: 29859094