Two-Session Radiosurgery for Large Primary Tumors Affecting the Brain.
brain stereotatic radiosurgery
brain tumors cns tumors
photon stereotactic radiosurgery
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Apr 2020
27 Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
6
2020
pubmed:
3
6
2020
medline:
3
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Surgery is an option for patients with large, symptomatic primary tumors affecting the brain. However, surgery might not be suitable for all tumors, especially those located in sensitive areas such as the pineal region and the hypothalamus. Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) might not provide an adequate dose for long-term local control due to the initial tumor volume and the involvement of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs). Two-session radiosurgery has been described as a feasible strategy for dose escalation in large secondary brain tumors. This report describes a series of patients treated upfront with two-session radiosurgery for primary tumors affecting the brain. Materials and methods From May 2017 to January 2020, eight patients with primary tumors affecting the brain were treated with two-session radiosurgery due to either an initial large tumor volume or tumor localization and the involvement of OARs. The response was assessed by imaging and clinical evaluations. Results A total of eight patients were treated, nine tumors were treated with two-session radiosurgery, four patients had tumors in the pineal region (50%), and the rest were in the hypothalamic region (25%) or elsewhere. The mean tumor volume for the first SRS session was 15 mL (range 5.2 to 51.6 mL), the mean prescription dose was 13 Gy, and the timespan between both sessions was 30 days (range, 30 to 42 days). During the second session, tumor volume was reduced to 73.6% (range, -20% to 98.7%) of the original dimension, mean tumor volume was 5 mL (range, 0.1 to 17.8 ml), mean prescription dose for the second session was 16.2 Gy estimated by time, dose, and fractionation and by bioequivalent dose under alpha-beta values often to be equivalent to a single dose of 15.8 Gy. Doses to the OARs for the optic pathway were equivalent to a single maximum dose of 9.75 Gy (range, 7.12 to 10.92), and to the brainstem, the equivalent was a maximum dose of 12.3 Gy (range, 5.6 to 15.07). At last follow-up, at a mean of 336.5 days (range, 65 to 962 days), seven patients were alive, five tumors had a partial response (PR), and three had stable disease in accordance to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. One patient died 435 days after treatment, the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 at the first session, 90 at the second session, and was maintained at last follow-up. No adverse radiation effects were reported. Conclusions Two-stage SRS proved to be a safe method to escalate dose in proportionately large volume primary brain tumors whose histology is expected to have a quick biological response to radiation. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the long-term effectiveness by tumor subtypes of two-stage SRS in the same manner as it has been proven in single session SRS series in smaller tumor volumes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32483501
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7850
pmc: PMC7255071
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e7850Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Lovo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Neurooncol. 2012 Aug;109(1):159-65
pubmed: 22544651
Cancer Radiother. 2015 Dec;19(8):775-89
pubmed: 26548600
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jul 1;83(1):114-121
pubmed: 28973432
J Neurooncol. 2012 Jul;108(3):507-12
pubmed: 22437346
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015 Oct;58(4):334-40
pubmed: 26587186
Cureus. 2016 Apr 27;8(4):e587
pubmed: 27284495
J Neurooncol. 2018 Dec;140(3):749-756
pubmed: 30367382
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 May 1;47(2):291-8
pubmed: 10802351
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 7;131(1):227-237
pubmed: 30192195
Cureus. 2019 Aug 24;11(8):e5472
pubmed: 31485386
Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Jul 29;21(9):78
pubmed: 31359299
Neurochirurgie. 2015 Apr-Jun;61(2-3):212-5
pubmed: 25612810
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Mar;63(3):398-405
pubmed: 26536284
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:974-982
pubmed: 28751141
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2015;50(2):68-72
pubmed: 25871983
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Aug 1;74(5):1543-8
pubmed: 19135317
Prog Neurol Surg. 2009;23:96-105
pubmed: 19329864
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jun 10;9:132
pubmed: 24917309
J Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;129(2):366-382
pubmed: 28937324
J Neurosurg. 2006 Jun;104(6):907-12
pubmed: 16776334
Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Feb;35(2):267-275
pubmed: 30515559
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):227-234
pubmed: 29608701