Different Perceptions among Women and Their Physicians Regarding Contraceptive Counseling: Results from the TANCO Survey in Brazil.
Diferentes percepções entre mulheres e seus médicos sobre o aconselhamento contraceptivo: Resultados da pesquisa TANCO no Brasil.
Journal
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
ISSN: 1806-9339
Titre abrégé: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 9214757
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
3
6
2020
pubmed:
3
6
2020
medline:
16
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The optimal use of contraceptive methods requires that women participate in targeted choice of methods that meet their individual needs and expectations. The Thinking About Needs in Contraception (TANCO) study is a quantitative online survey of the views of health professionals and women on aspects of contraceptive counseling and contraceptive use. Physicians and women attending clinics for contraception were invited to complete online questionnaires. The research explored the knowledge and use of contraceptive methods, satisfaction with the current method and interest in receiving more information on all methods. Aspects related to contraceptive practice among physicians were gathered in parallel. The results obtained in the Brazilian research were compared with those of the European research, which involved 11 countries. There was a high prevalence of contraceptive use and general satisfaction with the current method. A total of 63% of the women were using short-acting contraceptive (SAC) methods, and 9% were using a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC). Sixty-six percent of women were interested in receiving more information on all methods; 69% of women said they would consider LARC if they received more comprehensive information about it. Health professionals tend to underestimate the interest of women in receiving information about contraception in general, and more specifically about LARCs. Despite the high levels of use and satisfaction with the current methods, women were interested in receiving more information on all contraceptive methods. Structured contraceptive counseling based on individual needs and expectations may lead to greater knowledge and a greater likelihood of proper contraceptive choice. A utilização ideal de métodos contraceptivos requer que as mulheres participem da escolha orientada sobre métodos que atendam às suas necessidades e expectativas individuais. O estudo Houve alta prevalência do uso de contraceptivos e satisfação geral com o método atual. Sessenta e três por cento das mulheres estavam usando métodos de curta duração (SAC, na sigla em inglês), e 9% estavam usando um método de longa ação (LARC, na sigla em inglês). Sessenta e seis por cento das mulheres estavam interessadas em receber mais informações sobre todos os métodos; 69% das mulheres disseram que considerariam um LARC se recebessem informações mais abrangentes sobre esse método. Os profissionais de saúde tendem a subestimar o interesse das mulheres em receber informações sobre a contracepção em geral e, mais especificamente, sobre os LARC. CONCLUSãO: Apesar dos altos níveis de uso e satisfação com os métodos atuais, as mulheres estavam interessadas em receber mais informações sobre todos os métodos contraceptivos. O aconselhamento contraceptivo estruturado, baseado nas necessidades e expectativas individuais pode levar ao maior conhecimento e à maior probabilidade de escolha contraceptiva adequada.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(por)
A utilização ideal de métodos contraceptivos requer que as mulheres participem da escolha orientada sobre métodos que atendam às suas necessidades e expectativas individuais. O estudo
Identifiants
pubmed: 32483806
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712145
pmc: PMC10316857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
255-265Informations de copyright
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Bonassi R., Monteiro I., Guazzelli C., di Bella Z., Politano C., and Sakamoto L. had worked as advisors, were invited to give lectures, and received honors from Bayer SA and other pharmaceutical companies. Ushikusa T. E. is a Bayer employee. The Brazilian TANCO study was funded by Bayer SA.
Références
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Feb;180(2 Pt 2):276-9
pubmed: 9988830
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017 Jun;22(3):165-169
pubmed: 28277799
NCHS Data Brief. 2013 Feb;(112):1-8
pubmed: 23742711
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Mar 15;18(1):35
pubmed: 28298197
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Dec;46(4):233-40
pubmed: 25040686
Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):631-8
pubmed: 22770797
BMC Womens Health. 2014 Feb 13;14(1):28
pubmed: 24524562
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Dec;19(6):448-56
pubmed: 25112310
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1105-1113
pubmed: 21508749
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2018 Jun;23(3):183-193
pubmed: 29785864
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014 Aug;19(4):266-75
pubmed: 24856072
BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 28;13:9
pubmed: 23448283
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jun;295(6):1483-1491
pubmed: 28434106
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):182-222
pubmed: 27032746
Int J Womens Health. 2014 Apr 03;6:367-75
pubmed: 24729734
Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):280-7
pubmed: 24863169
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;120(6):1291-7
pubmed: 23168752
Womens Health Issues. 2010 Nov-Dec;20(6):394-9
pubmed: 21050998
Contraception. 2011 May;83(5):397-404
pubmed: 21477680
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 May;24(5):349-53
pubmed: 25825986
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002 Nov-Dec;34(6):294-303
pubmed: 12558092
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Jun;39(3):267-9
pubmed: 25904387
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;114(6):1424-1427
pubmed: 20134298
Contraception. 2003 Nov;68(5):373-6
pubmed: 14636942
Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):685-700
pubmed: 23083527
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD005497
pubmed: 17443596
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7
pubmed: 20541171
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):181-8
pubmed: 17197603
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Aug;17(4):270-83
pubmed: 22758651
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2000 Mar;5(1):85-90
pubmed: 10836668
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Apr;54(4):404-9
pubmed: 23932259
Contraception. 2008 Sep;78(3):197-200
pubmed: 18692608
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):659-73
pubmed: 25264697