Comparison of Deep-Learning and Conventional Machine-Learning Methods for the Automatic Recognition of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Areas from Ultrasound Images.
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
automatic diagnosis
image processing
pattern recognition
ultrasound images
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2020
29 May 2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
revised:
26
05
2020
accepted:
27
05
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
11
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The emergence of deep-learning methods in different computer vision tasks has proved to offer increased detection, recognition or segmentation accuracy when large annotated image datasets are available. In the case of medical image processing and computer-aided diagnosis within ultrasound images, where the amount of available annotated data is smaller, a natural question arises: are deep-learning methods better than conventional machine-learning methods? How do the conventional machine-learning methods behave in comparison with deep-learning methods on the same dataset? Based on the study of various deep-learning architectures, a lightweight multi-resolution Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture is proposed. It is suitable for differentiating, within ultrasound images, between the Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), respectively the cirrhotic parenchyma (PAR) on which HCC had evolved. The proposed deep-learning model is compared with other CNN architectures that have been adapted by transfer learning for the ultrasound binary classification task, but also with conventional machine-learning (ML) solutions trained on textural features. The achieved results show that the deep-learning approach overcomes classical machine-learning solutions, by providing a higher classification performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32485986
pii: s20113085
doi: 10.3390/s20113085
pmc: PMC7309124
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation
ID : PNIII-P1-1.2-PCCDI2017-0221 Nr.59/1st March 2018
Références
Insights Imaging. 2017 Aug;8(4):377-392
pubmed: 28616760
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Dec;13(12):1895-1903
pubmed: 30094778
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 13;17(1):
pubmed: 28098774
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Aug;32(4):605-617
pubmed: 30756265
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):729-741
pubmed: 29730602
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2018 Apr;40(4):834-848
pubmed: 28463186
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Nov 21;48(22):3735-53
pubmed: 14680270
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005 Feb;7(1):11-8
pubmed: 15701293
Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:348135
pubmed: 22312411
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996;22(9):1177-81
pubmed: 9123642
Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:6215085
pubmed: 28070212
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):146-155
pubmed: 29239710
Neurospine. 2019 Dec;16(4):657-668
pubmed: 31905454