Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour.
animal tool behaviour
baseline experiment
learning mechanism
social learning
tool manufacture
tool use
Journal
Biology letters
ISSN: 1744-957X
Titre abrégé: Biol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101247722
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
26
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite major advances in the study of animal tool behaviour, researchers continue to debate how exactly certain behaviours are acquired. While specific mechanisms, such as genetic predispositions or action copying, are sometimes suspected to play a major role in behavioural acquisition, controlled experiments are required to provide conclusive evidence. In this opinion piece, we refer to classic ethological methodologies to emphasize the need for studying the relative contributions of different factors to the emergence of specific tool behaviours. We describe a methodology, consisting of a carefully staged series of baseline and social-learning conditions, that enables us to tease apart the roles of different mechanisms in the development of behavioural repertoires. Experiments employing our proposed methodology will not only advance our understanding of animal learning and culture, but as a result, will also help inform hypotheses about human cognitive, cultural and technological evolution. More generally, our conceptual framework is suitable for guiding the detailed investigation of other seemingly complex animal behaviours.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32486940
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0122
pmc: PMC7336849
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20200122Références
PLoS Biol. 2005 Jul;3(7):e208
pubmed: 15934787
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2189-93
pubmed: 11674865
PLoS Biol. 2014 Sep 30;12(9):e1001960
pubmed: 25268798
Evol Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;38(5):635-644
pubmed: 29333058
Anim Cogn. 2009 Oct;12 Suppl 1:87-101
pubmed: 19727866
Curr Biol. 2012 Nov 20;22(22):2155-60
pubmed: 23142041
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 07;11(9):e0160483
pubmed: 27603668
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Nov;82:58-75
pubmed: 28034660
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 24;6:35953
pubmed: 27775061
Learn Behav. 2010 Aug;38(3):206-19
pubmed: 20628160
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1008-16
pubmed: 21357223
Science. 1968 Jun 28;160(3835):1411-8
pubmed: 5690147
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 27;364(1528):2405-15
pubmed: 19620111
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 7;278(1704):408-16
pubmed: 20719777
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;14(11):477-81
pubmed: 20685155
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Apr 5;373(1743):
pubmed: 29440517
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 30;285(1879):
pubmed: 29848653
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1994 May;69(2):207-31
pubmed: 8054445
Sci Rep. 2017 May 11;7(1):1788
pubmed: 28496154
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 4;9(1):8260
pubmed: 31164683
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 4;12(12):e0188866
pubmed: 29200437
Nature. 2016 Sep 14;537(7620):403-7
pubmed: 27629645
Curr Biol. 2011 Nov 8;21(21):1808-12
pubmed: 22018539
Curr Biol. 2018 Sep 24;28(18):R1109-R1111
pubmed: 30253153
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4436-41
pubmed: 11891325
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):22918-22920
pubmed: 31659039
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7877-7883
pubmed: 28739945
Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):682-5
pubmed: 10385119
Am J Primatol. 2019 Jul;81(6):e22987
pubmed: 31087361
Nature. 2005 Jan 13;433(7022):121
pubmed: 15650729
PeerJ. 2017 Sep 22;5:e3814
pubmed: 28951813
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0121804
pubmed: 25875283
Am J Primatol. 2014 Jul;76(7):649-57
pubmed: 24482055
R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 9;5(5):171826
pubmed: 29892375