A survey exploring ophthalmologists' attitudes and beliefs in performing Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery in the United Kingdom.
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cataract
/ complications
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Health Care Surveys
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Lens Implantation, Intraocular
Male
Ophthalmologists
/ psychology
Phacoemulsification
/ methods
State Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Cataract
Cataract surgery
DSBCS
ISBCS
Sequential bilateral cataract surgery
Survey
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jun 2020
02 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
accepted:
19
05
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The standard approach to treat cataracts is Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (DSBCS), during which patients have a separate operation date for each eye. An alternative method of delivery is Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS). The aim of this project was to examine the attitudes and beliefs of UK ophthalmologists towards ISBCS, explore their reasons to either practise or not practise ISBCS and identify barriers hindering its implementation in the UK. A questionnaire was distributed to consultant members of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) and collected electronically. An initial screening question in regards to prior experience with ISBCS directed the rest of the survey; participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors with regards to performing ISBCS. Free text options were also available. Descriptive analysis was subsequently performed. Of the 1357 recipients, 130 (9.6%) ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of those, 13.9% were currently performing ISBCS, 83.1% had never performed, and 3.1% had previously done so but since stopped. The main factors that acted as barriers were lack of: (1) College approval (20.5%); (2) medico-legal approval (20.2%); (3) evidence to support the use of ISBCS (16.0%); and (4) hospital approval (13.3%). Additionally, the perceived risk of complications for patients played an important role when considering ISBCS, with the risk of endophthalmitis being most feared. This survey demonstrates some of the barriers that prevent ophthalmologist's performing ISBCS in the UK. There is a need for further exploration in this field to evaluate the effect of addressing any of these concerns on the implementation of ISBCS.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The standard approach to treat cataracts is Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (DSBCS), during which patients have a separate operation date for each eye. An alternative method of delivery is Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS). The aim of this project was to examine the attitudes and beliefs of UK ophthalmologists towards ISBCS, explore their reasons to either practise or not practise ISBCS and identify barriers hindering its implementation in the UK.
METHODS
METHODS
A questionnaire was distributed to consultant members of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) and collected electronically. An initial screening question in regards to prior experience with ISBCS directed the rest of the survey; participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors with regards to performing ISBCS. Free text options were also available. Descriptive analysis was subsequently performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 1357 recipients, 130 (9.6%) ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of those, 13.9% were currently performing ISBCS, 83.1% had never performed, and 3.1% had previously done so but since stopped. The main factors that acted as barriers were lack of: (1) College approval (20.5%); (2) medico-legal approval (20.2%); (3) evidence to support the use of ISBCS (16.0%); and (4) hospital approval (13.3%). Additionally, the perceived risk of complications for patients played an important role when considering ISBCS, with the risk of endophthalmitis being most feared.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This survey demonstrates some of the barriers that prevent ophthalmologist's performing ISBCS in the UK. There is a need for further exploration in this field to evaluate the effect of addressing any of these concerns on the implementation of ISBCS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32487105
doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01475-0
pii: 10.1186/s12886-020-01475-0
pmc: PMC7265252
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
210Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):826-30
pubmed: 16765801
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):2105-14
pubmed: 22108106
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jun;31(6):1261-2
pubmed: 16039514
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jun;37(6):992-1002
pubmed: 21497049
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jun;34(6):1036-7
pubmed: 18499016
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Oct;27(10):1553-9
pubmed: 11687351
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):407-10
pubmed: 16631047
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:912481
pubmed: 26351576
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep-Oct;43(7):666-72
pubmed: 25824813
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;28(1):81-86
pubmed: 27684294
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1208-16
pubmed: 21700101
Can J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;53(4):337-341
pubmed: 30119786
Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;48(6):482-8
pubmed: 24314408
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Dec;45(12):1725-1731
pubmed: 31856982
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Jul;29(7):1281-91
pubmed: 12900233
BMJ. 2006 Jul 15;333(7559):128-32
pubmed: 16840470
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct-Dec;30(4):244-249
pubmed: 28003784
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep-Oct;55(5):374-5
pubmed: 17699948