Attitudes of rural communities towards the use of technology for health purposes in New Zealand: a focus group study.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 06 2020
Historique:
entrez: 4 6 2020
pubmed: 4 6 2020
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Examine attitudes to using online health and wellness services, and determine what barriers may exist to this in two rural communities in New Zealand. A thematic analysis informed by a social constructivist paradigm explored the attitudes of youth and adults to give voice to these communities. Eighteen focus groups-nine in each region-were held for an hour each, with between three and nine participants in each group. Two rural areas at the Northern and Southern ends of New Zealand were chosen. In each area, we partnered with a local health centre providing primary care services. Three localities were identified within each region where we conducted the data collection. Participants were youth aged 12-15 years, aged 16-20 years and adults over 21 years. Overall, 74 females and 40 males were recruited. Recruitment occurred through schools, community organisations or personal contacts of the facilitators, who were youth workers in their respective communities. Ethnicity of the participants was representative of each area, with a higher percentage of Māori participants in Northland. Eight themes were identified which described participants' attitudes to technology use in healthcare. Themes covered accessibility, cost, independence, anonymity and awareness issues: technology makes health information easily accessible; access to technology can be limited in rural communities; technology can reduce the cost of healthcare but it is too expensive for some; technology increases independence and autonomy of people's own health; independent healthcare decisions come with risks; anonymity encourages people to seek help online; technology can help raise awareness and provide peer-support for people with health issues; technology impacts on social relationships. Participants-particularly youth-were generally positive about the role of technology in healthcare delivery, and interested in ways technology could improve autonomy and access to health and wellness services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32487583
pii: bmjopen-2020-037892
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037892
pmc: PMC7264992
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e037892

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 11;14:109
pubmed: 24725765
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(3):1357-83
pubmed: 27524773
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):261
pubmed: 30424760
J Rural Health. 2016 Winter;32(1):56-62
pubmed: 26174590
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Oct;142:90-9
pubmed: 26298645
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;43:1-16
pubmed: 26655959
BMJ Open. 2016 May 17;6(5):e010652
pubmed: 27188809
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):149-160
pubmed: 27995826
Psychol Serv. 2012 May;9(2):111-131
pubmed: 22662727
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20548
pubmed: 21673987
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Oct 1;88(10):777-82
pubmed: 20931063
J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;8(3):204-209
pubmed: 29530203
PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001363
pubmed: 23458994
BJGP Open. 2017 Oct 18;1(4):bjgpopen17X101181
pubmed: 30564688
Psychol Serv. 2016 Feb;13(1):20-30
pubmed: 26192259
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):3808
pubmed: 27744708
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Aug;101(2):e39-45
pubmed: 24030085
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85
pubmed: 23615206
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2016 Apr;36(4):63-75
pubmed: 27077792
Intern Med J. 2016 Aug;46(8):977-81
pubmed: 27553999
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 Mar;40(2):87-95
pubmed: 22001968
J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;8(3):196-203
pubmed: 29530202
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jan;15(1):23-30
pubmed: 29501431
Health Promot Pract. 2012 Mar;13(2):159-64
pubmed: 22382491
N Z Med J. 2004 Aug 06;117(1199):U996
pubmed: 15475979

Auteurs

Duncan R Babbage (DR)

Auckland University of Technology, Centre for eHealth, Auckland, New Zealand.

Kirsten van Kessel (K)

Centre for eHealth & School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand kvankess@aut.ac.nz.

Agnes Terraschke (A)

Auckland University of Technology, Centre for eHealth, Auckland, New Zealand.

Juliet Drown (J)

Auckland University of Technology, Centre for eHealth, Auckland, New Zealand.

Hinemoa Elder (H)

Brain Research New Zealand, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH