Increased immunocompetence and network centrality of allogroomer workers suggest a link between individual and social immunity in honeybees.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 06 2020
Historique:
received: 25 02 2019
accepted: 24 04 2020
entrez: 4 6 2020
pubmed: 4 6 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The significant risk of disease transmission has selected for effective immune-defense strategies in insect societies. Division of labour, with individuals specialized in immunity-related tasks, strongly contributes to prevent the spread of diseases. A trade-off, however, may exist between phenotypic specialization to increase task efficiency and maintenance of plasticity to cope with variable colony demands. We investigated the extent of phenotypic specialization associated with a specific task by using allogrooming in the honeybee, Apis mellifera, where worker behaviour might lower ectoparasites load. We adopted an integrated approach to characterize the behavioural and physiological phenotype of allogroomers, by analyzing their behavior (both at individual and social network level), their immunocompetence (bacterial clearance tests) and their chemosensory specialization (proteomics of olfactory organs). We found that allogroomers have higher immune capacity compared to control bees, while they do not differ in chemosensory proteomic profiles. Behaviourally, they do not show differences in the tasks performed (other than allogrooming), while they clearly differ in connectivity within the colonial social network, having a higher centrality than control bees. This demonstrates the presence of an immune-specific physiological and social behavioural specialization in individuals involved in a social immunity related task, thus linking individual to social immunity, and it shows how phenotypes may be specialized in the task performed while maintaining an overall plasticity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32488140
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65780-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-65780-w
pmc: PMC7265547
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8928

Références

Hughes, W. Life histories and parasite pressure across the major groups of social insects. Insect evolutionary ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society’s 22nd Symposium (eds. Fellowes, M. D. E., Holloway, G. J. & Rolff, J.) CABI publishing, 211, 139–139 (2005).
Wilson, E. O. The sociogenesis of insect colonies. Science 228, 1489–1495 (1985).
pubmed: 17831241 doi: 10.1126/science.228.4707.1489
Currie, C. R., Poulsen, M., Mendenhall, J., Boomsma, J. J. & Billen, J. Coevolved crypts and exocrine glands support mutualistic bacteria in fungus-growing ants. Science 311, 81–83 (2006).
pubmed: 16400148 doi: 10.1126/science.1119744
Little, A. E., Murakami, T., Mueller, U. G. & Currie, C. R. Defending against parasites: fungus-growing ants combine specialized behaviours and microbial symbionts to protect their fungus gardens. Biology Letters 2, 12–16 (2006).
pubmed: 17148313 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0371
Powell, S. Ecological specialization and the evolution of a specialized caste in Cephalotes ants. Functional Ecology 22, 902–911 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01436.x
Šobotník, J. et al. Explosive backpacks in old termite workers. Science 337, 436–436 (2012).
pubmed: 22837520 doi: 10.1126/science.1219129
Mertl, A. L. & Traniello, J. F. Behavioral evolution in the major worker subcaste of twig-nesting Pheidole (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): does morphological specialization influence task plasticity? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 1411–1426 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0797-3
West-Eberhard, M. J. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20, 249–278 (1989).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341
Bourke, A. F., Franks, N. R. & Franks, N. R. Social evolution in ants. (Princeton University Press, 1995).
Tofts, C. & Franks, N. R. Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7, 346–349 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(92)90128-X
Hölldobler B. & Wilson E. O. The ants. (Harvard University Press, 1990).
Evans, J. D. & Spivak, M. Socialized medicine: individual and communal disease barriers in honey bees. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103, S62–S72 (2010).
pubmed: 19909975 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.019
Hughes, W. O., Eilenberg, J. & Boomsma, J. J. Trade-offs in group living: transmission and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 269, 1811–1819 (2002).
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2113
Rosengaus, R. B., Guldin, M. R. & Traniello, J. F. Inhibitory effect of termite fecal pellets on fungal spore germination. Journal of Chemical Ecology 24, 1697–1706 (1998).
doi: 10.1023/A:1020872729671
Yanagawa, A., Yokohari, F. & Shimizu, S. Defense mechanism of the termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki, to entomopathogenic fungi. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 97, 165–170 (2008).
pubmed: 17949740 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2007.09.005
Aumeier, P. Bioassay for grooming effectiveness towards Varroa destructor mites in Africanized and Carniolan honey bees. Apidologie 32, 81–90 (2001).
doi: 10.1051/apido:2001113
Boecking, O. & Spivak, M. Behavioral defenses of honey bees against Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie 30, 141–158 (1999).
doi: 10.1051/apido:19990205
Guzman-Novoa, E., Emsen, B., Unger, P., Espinosa-Montaño, L. G. & Petukhova, T. Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 110, 314–320 (2012).
pubmed: 22465569 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.020
Kruitwagen, A., van Langevelde, F., van Dooremalen, C. & Blacquière, T. Naturally selected honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies resistant to Varroa destructor do not groom more intensively. Journal of Apicultural Research 56, 354–365 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1329797
Pritchard, D. J. Grooming by honey bees as a component of varroa resistant behavior. Journal of Apicultural Research 55, 38–48 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1196016
Pettis, J. S. & Pankiw, T. Grooming behavior by Apis mellifera L. in the presence of Acarapis woodi (Rennie)(Acari: Tarsonemidae). Apidologie 29, 241–253 (1998).
doi: 10.1051/apido:19980304
Zaitoun, S. T. & Al-Ghzawi, A. Monthly changes in the natural grooming response in workers of three honey bee subspecies against the bee parasitic mite, Varroa destructor. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5, 207–217 (2009).
Nazzi, F. & Le Conte, Y. Ecology of Varroa destructor, the major ectoparasite of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. Annual Review of Entomology 61, 417–432 (2016).
pubmed: 26667378 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010715-023731
Rosenkranz, P., Aumeier, P. & Ziegelmann, B. Biology and control of Varroa destructor. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 103, S96–S119 (2010).
pubmed: 19909970 doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2009.07.016
Dietemann, V. et al. Varroa destructor: research avenues towards sustainable control. Journal of Apicultural Research 51, 125–132 (2012).
doi: 10.3896/IBRA.1.51.1.15
Seeley, T. D. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11, 287–293 (1982).
doi: 10.1007/BF00299306
Kuswadi, A. N. Allogrooming behavior of European honey bees Apis mellifera L. Master of Science in Entomology, thesis submitted to Oregon State University (1992).
Winston, M. L. & Punnett, E. N. Factors determining temporal division of labor in honeybees. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60, 2947–2952 (1982).
doi: 10.1139/z82-372
Kolmes, S. A. Grooming specialists among worker honey bees, Apis mellifera. Animal behaviour (1989).
doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(89)90150-4
Van der Blom, J. Individual differentiation in behaviour of honey bee workers (Apis mellifera L.). Insectes sociaux 40, 345–361 (1993).
doi: 10.1007/BF01253898
Baracchi, D. & Cini, A. A socio-spatial combined approach confirms a highly compartmentalised structure in honeybees. Ethology 120, 1167–1176 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/eth.12290
Stroeymeyt, N., Casillas-Perez, B. & Cremer, S. Organisational immunity in social insects. Current Opinion in. Insect Science 5, 1–15 (2014).
Cappa, F., Bruschini, C., Protti, I., Turillazzi, S. & Cervo, R. Bee guards detect foreign foragers with cuticular chemical profiles altered by phoretic varroa mites. Journal of Apicultural Research 55, 268–277 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1229886
Richard, F.-J., Holt, H. L. & Grozinger, C. M. Effects of immunostimulation on social behavior, chemical communication and genome-wide gene expression in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Bmc Genomics 13, 558 (2012).
pubmed: 23072398 pmcid: 3483235 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-558
Cappa, F. et al. Natural biocide disrupts nestmate recognition in honeybees. Scientific Reports 9, 1–10 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38963-3
Mondet, F. et al. Antennae hold a key to Varroa-sensitive hygiene behaviour in honey bees. Scientific Reports 5, 10454 (2015).
pubmed: 26000641 pmcid: 4441115 doi: 10.1038/srep10454
Iovinella, I. et al. Antennal protein profile in poneybees: caste and task matter more than age. Frontiers in Physiology 9, 748 (2018).
Guarna, M. M. et al. A search for protein biomarkers links olfactory signal transduction to social immunity. BMC Genomics 16, 63 (2015).
pubmed: 25757461 pmcid: 4342888 doi: 10.1186/s12864-014-1193-6
Guarna, M. M. et al. Peptide biomarkers used for the selective breeding of a complex polygenic trait in honey bees. Scientific Reports 7, 1–10 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08464-2
Pelosi, P., Zhou, J.-J., Ban, L. & Calvello, M. Soluble proteins in insect chemical communication. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS 63, 1658–1676 (2006).
pubmed: 16786224 doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5607-0
Pelosi, P., Iovinella, I., Felicioli, A. & Dani, F. R. Soluble proteins of chemical communication: an overview across arthropods. Frontiers in Physiology 5, 320 (2014).
pubmed: 25221516 pmcid: 4145409 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00320
Leal, W. S. Odorant reception in insects: roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology 58, 373–391 (2013).
pubmed: 23020622 doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153635
Moore, D., Angel, J. E., Cheeseman, I. M., Robinson, G. E. & Fahrbach, S. E. A highly specialized social grooming honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 8, 855–861 (1995).
doi: 10.1007/BF02009512
Pritchard, D. J. Grooming by honey bees as a component of varroa resistant behavior. Journal of Apicultural Research 55, 38–48 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1196016
Huang, Z.-Y. & Robinson, G. E. Regulation of honey bee division of labor by colony age demography. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 39, 147–158 (1996).
doi: 10.1007/s002650050276
Robinson, G. E. Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20, 329–338 (1987).
doi: 10.1007/BF00300679
Robinson, G. E. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology 37, 637–665 (1992).
pubmed: 1539941 doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225
Amdam, G. V. et al. Social reversal of immunosenescence in honey bee workers. Experimental Gerontology 40, 939–947 (2005).
pubmed: 16169181 pmcid: 2409152 doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.08.004
Amdam, G. V. & Omholt, S. W. The hive bee to forager transition in honeybee colonies: the double repressor hypothesis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223, 451–464 (2003).
pubmed: 12875823 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00121-8
Breed, M. D., Guzmán-Novoa, E. & Hunt, G. J. 3. Defensive behavior of honey bees: organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual Reviews in Entomology 49, 271–298 (2004).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123155
Robinson, G. E., Page, R. E. Jr, Strambi, C. & Strambi, A. Colony integration in honey bees: mechanisms of behavioral reversion. Ethology 90, 336–348 (1992).
doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00844.x
Land, B. B. & Seeley, T. D. The grooming invitation dance of the honey bee. Ethology 110, 1–10 (2004).
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00947.x
Charles, H. M. & Killian, K. A. Response of the insect immune system to three different immune challenges. Journal of Insect Physiology 81, 97–108 (2015).
pubmed: 26164746 doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.07.005
Cappa, F. et al. Immunity of honeybee guards reflects their transition from house bees to foragers. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 32:(3), 289–295 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/03949370.2019.1695228
Richard, F.-J., Holt, H. L. & Grozinger, C. M. Effects of immunostimulation on social behavior, chemical communication and genome-wide gene expression in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Bmc Genomics 13, 558 (2012).
pubmed: 23072398 pmcid: 3483235 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-558
Richard, F. J., Aubert, A. & Grozinger, C. M. Modulation of social interactions by immune stimulation in honey bee, Apis mellifera, workers. BMC Biology 6, 50 (2008).
pubmed: 19014614 pmcid: 2596086 doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-50
Huang, Z.-Y., Robinson, G. & Borst, D. Physiological correlates of division of labor among similarly aged honey bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 174, 731–739 (1994).
doi: 10.1007/BF00192722
Pearce, A., Huang, Z. & Breed, M. Juvenile hormone and aggression in honey bees. Journal of Insect Physiology 47, 1243–1247 (2001).
pubmed: 12770175 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00109-3
Peng, Y.-S., Fang, Y., Xu, S. & Ge, L. The resistance mechanism of the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana Fabr., to an ectoparasitic mite, Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 49, 54–60 (1987).
doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(87)90125-X
Boecking, O. & Spivak, M. Behavioral defenses of honey bees against Varroa jacobsoni Oud. Apidologie 30, 141–158 (1999).
doi: 10.1051/apido:19990205
Invernizzi, C., Zefferino, I., Santos, E., Sánchez, L. & Mendoza, Y. Multilevel assessment of grooming behavior against Varroa destructor in Italian and Africanized honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research 54, 321–327 (2015).
doi: 10.1080/00218839.2016.1159055
Altmann, J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–266 (1974).
doi: 10.1163/156853974X00534 pubmed: 4597405
Woyciechowski, M. & Kozłowski, J. Division of labor by division of risk according to worker life expectancy in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 29, 191–205 (1998).
doi: 10.1051/apido:19980111
Baddeley, A. et al. spatstat: Spatial Point Pattern analysis, modelfitting and simulation. R package version. (2005).
Jandt, J. M., Huang, E. & Dornhaus, A. Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63, 1829–1836 (2009).
doi: 10.1007/s00265-009-0810-x
Johnson, B. Spatial effects, sampling errors, and task specialization in the honey bee. Insectes Sociaux 57, 239–248 (2010).
pubmed: 20351761 pmcid: 2839491 doi: 10.1007/s00040-010-0077-2
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. & Ryan, P. PAST-Palaeontological statistics. www. uv. es/~ pardomv/pe/2001_1/past/pastprog/past. pdf, acessado em 25, 2009 (2001).
Everett, M. & Borgatti, S. P. Ego network betweenness. Social Networks 27, 31–38 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.007
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Freeman, L. C. Ucinet. in Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining 2261–2267 (Springer, 2014).
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Research 47, D442–D450 (2019).
pubmed: 30395289 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106
Cappa, F., Beani, L., Cervo, R., Grozinger, C. & Manfredini, F. Testing male immunocompetence in two hymenopterans with different levels of social organization:‘live hard, die young?’. Biological journal of the Linnean Society 114, 274–278 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/bij.12427
Cini, A. et al. Competition between the native and the introduced hornets Vespa crabro and Vespa velutina: a comparison of potentially relevant life‐history traits. Ecological Entomology 43, 351–362 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/een.12507
Manfredini, F., Beani, L., Taormina, M. & Vannini, L. Parasitic infection protects wasp larvae against a bacterial challenge. Microbes and Infection 12, 727–735 (2010).
pubmed: 20546915 doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.05.001
Yang, X. & Cox-Foster, D. L. Impact of an ectoparasite on the immunity and pathology of an invertebrate: evidence for host immunosuppression and viral amplification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 7470–7475 (2005).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501860102
Gillespie, J. P., Kanost, M. R. & Trenczek, T. Biological mediators of insect immunity. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 611–643 (1997).
pubmed: 9017902 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.611
Schmid-Hempel, P. Evolutionary ecology of insect immune defenses. Annual Review of Entomology 50, 529–551 (2005).
pubmed: 15471530 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.50.071803.130420
Baracchi, D., Mazza, G. & Turillazzi, S. From individual to collective immunity: the role of the venom as antimicrobial agent in the Stenogastrinae wasp societies. Journal of Insect Physiology 58, 188–193 (2012).
pubmed: 22108024 doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.11.007

Auteurs

Alessandro Cini (A)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy. cini.ales@gmail.com.
Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. cini.ales@gmail.com.

Adele Bordoni (A)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Federico Cappa (F)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Iacopo Petrocelli (I)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Martina Pitzalis (M)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Immacolata Iovinella (I)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Francesca Romana Dani (FR)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.
CISM, Mass Spectrometry Centre, Università di Firenze, Via U. Schiff 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Stefano Turillazzi (S)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Rita Cervo (R)

Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH