Twenty years later: is the scrotal one-incision AUS of value?
Journal
International journal of impotence research
ISSN: 1476-5489
Titre abrégé: Int J Impot Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
10
05
2020
accepted:
19
05
2020
revised:
14
05
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The artificial urinary sphincter, known as AMS 800, has been the gold standard for treating moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence in males for 40 years. Yet, the number of sphincters done globally is quite small and the majority of urologists doing them are infrequent implanters. Estimates for 2019 showed half of implanters did only one implant that year and worldwide only around 13,000 implantations were performed. The traditional two-incision technique of perineal exposure for cuff placement and abdominal incision for pump and pressure regulating balloon persists as the most common technique to surgically place an artificial urinary sphincter. Present estimates are that upwards of 80% are done via the perineal approach and that approach is the highly favored incision of large volume centers. The scrotal one-incision approach was invented by Wilson 20 years ago and was aimed at making the implantation of a sphincter quicker, easier and safer for the occasional implanter. These physicians perform 1-2 devices per year, comprise 60% of implanters who perform the surgery yearly, and implant 22% of all implanted devices. Our article targets these infrequent inserters discussing the history of the two techniques and what the authors have learned about the advantages and hazards of the one scrotal incision procedure over the last two decades.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32488211
doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0317-6
pii: 10.1038/s41443-020-0317-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-251Informations de copyright
© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Treatment of urinary incontinence by implantable prosthetic sphincter. Urology. 1973;1:252–9.
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90749-8
Wilson S, Delk FR, Henry GD, Siegel AL. New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol. 2003;169:261–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64082-7
James MH, McCammon KA. Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: a review. Int J Urol. 2014;21:536–43.
doi: 10.1111/iju.12392
Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00540.x
Fuller TW, Ballon-Landa E, Gallo Kelsey, Smith TG, Ajay D, Westney OL, et al. Outcomes and risk factors of revision and replacement artificial urinary sphincter implantation in radiated and non-radiated patients. J Urol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000749 .
Ravier E, Fassi-Fehri H, Crouzet S, Gelet A, Abid N, Martin X. Complications after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in patients with or without prior radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2015;115:300–7.
doi: 10.1111/bju.12777
Van der AF, drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN. Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63:681–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034
Shen YC, Chiang PH. The experience of artificial urinary sphincter implantation by a single surgeon in 15 years. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013;29:157–60.
doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2012.08.026
Kretschmer A, Husch T, Thomsen Frauke, Kronlachner D, Obaje A, Anding R. Complications and short-term explantation rate following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: results from a large middle European multi-institutional case series. Urol Int. 2016;97:205–11.
doi: 10.1159/000446351
Demographics provided by Boston Scientific Marketing Department as per Wasscher B and Keefe V per Email on 4/23/2020
Matsushita K, Chughtai BI, Maschino AC, Lee RK, Sandhu JS. International variation in artificial urinary sphincter use. Urology. 2012;80:667–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.065
Furlow WL. Implantation of a new semiautomatic artificial genitourinary sphincter: experience with primary activation and deactivation in 47 patients. J Urol. 1981;126:741–44.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)54726-6
Scott FB. The artificial urinary sphincter. Experience in adults. Urol Clin North Am. 1985;12:305–15.
doi: 10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01643-8
Ludwig T, Dahlem R, Fisch M. Basic perineal and scrotal techniques. In: Moncada II, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Lledo-Garcia E, Mulcahy JJ. Textbook of urogenital prosthetic surgery. S.A. Madrid Spain: Editorial Medica Pan Americana; 2020. p. 271.
Mulcahy JJ. Tips for successful placement of artificial urinary sphincter. Contemp Urol. 1999;11:å46–51.
Wilson SK, Delk JR. Ectopic placement of AMS 800 urinary control system pressure regulating balloon. Urology. 2005;65:167–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.09.042
Morey AF, Cefalu CA, Hudak SJ. High submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons and reservoirs vis transcrotal approach. J Sex Med. 2013;10:603–10.
doi: 10.1111/jsm.12000
Brito CG, Mulcahy JJ, Mitchel ME, Adams MC. Use of a double cuff AMS800 urinary sphincter for severe stress incontinence. J Urol. 1993;149:283–5.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36057-3
O’Connor RC, Lyon MB, Guralnick ML, Bales GT. Long-term follow-up of single versus double cuff artificial urinary sphincter insertion for the treatment of severe postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2008;71:90–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.017
Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL, Webster GD. Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol. 2002;167:2075–8.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65088-4
Sotelo TM, Westney OL. Outcomes related to placing an artificial urinary sphincter using a single-incision, transverse scrotal technique in high risk patients. BJU Int. 2008;101:1124–7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07503.x
Henry GD, Graham SM, Cleves MA, Simmons CJ, Flynn B. Perineal approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation appears to control male stress incontinence better than the transscrotal approach. J Urol. 2008;179:1475–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.058
Henry GD, Graham SM, Cornell RJ, Cleves MA, Simmons CJ, Vakalopoulos I, et al. A multicenter study on the perineal versus penoscrotal approach for implantation of artificial urinary sphincter: cuff size and control of male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;182:2404–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.068
Wilson SK, Aliotta PJ, Salem EA, Mulcahy JJ. New enhancement of the scrotal one-incision technique for placement of artificial urinary sphincter allow proximal cuff placement. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3510–15.
doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01933.x
Queissert F, Huesch T, Kretschmer A, Anding R, Kurosch M, kirschner-Hermans R, et al. Artificial urinary sphincter cuff size predicts outcome in male patients treated for stress incontinence: results of a large central European multicenter cohort study. Int Neurourol J. 2019;23:219–25.
doi: 10.5213/inj.1938032.016
Kretschner A, Husch Tanja, Thomsen F, Kronlachner D, Obaje A, Anding R, et al. Debates on Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-project. Complications and short-term explantation rate following artificial urinary sphincter implantation: results from a large middle European multi-institutional case series. Urol Int. 2016;97:205–11.
doi: 10.1159/000446351
Shen YC, Chiang PH. Is the penoscrotal approach inferior to the perineal approach for artificial sphincter implantation in male urinary incontinence? A preliminary experience. Int J Urol. 2012;19:786–9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03013.x
Yafi FA, Delay KJ, Stewart C, Chiang J, Sangkum P, Hellstrom WJG. Device survival after primary implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter for male stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2017;197:759–65.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.107
Staniorski CJ, Singal A, nettey O, Yura E, Keeter MK, Kieb S, Hofer MD. Revisiting the peonscrotal approach to artificial urinary sphincter surgery: how does it compare to the perineal incision for initial implantation? World J Urol 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03244-6 . [Epub ahead of print].
Jamaer C, Bruyn HD, van Renterghem A, Baten E, van Renterghem K. Penoscrotal incision for primary implantation of AMS 800 urinary sphincter. J Sex med. 2019;16 Suppl 2:S22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.093
Bugeja S, Ivaz SL, Frost A, Andrich DE, Mundy AR. Urethral atrophy after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: fact or fiction? BJU Int. 2016;123:252–7.
Terlecki R, Wilson SK. A new paradigm for surgical revision of the artificial urinary sphincter for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Int J Impot Res. 2020. [Epub ahead of print].
Rehder P, Gozzi C. Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52:860–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.110