Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.
Cluster preference
Head and neck cancer
Health-related quality of life
Intervention
Patient concerns inventory
Prompt list
Randomised trial
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
10
03
2020
accepted:
20
05
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The main aim of this paper is to present baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and HRQOL in the two groups of the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) trial. The baseline PCI data will also be described. This is a pragmatic cluster preference randomised control trial with 15 consultant clusters from two sites either 'using' (n = 8) or 'not using' (n = 7) the PCI at a clinic for all of their trial patients. The PCI is a 56-item prompt list that helps patients raise concerns that otherwise might be missed. Eligibility was head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent (all sites, stage of disease, treatments). From 511 patients first identified as eligible when screening for the multi-disciplinary tumour board meetings, 288 attended a first routine outpatient baseline study clinic after completion of their treatment, median (IQR) of 103 (71-162) days. At baseline, the two trial groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics as well as in HRQOL measures apart from differences in tumour location, tumour staging and mode of treatment. These exceptions were cluster (consultant) related to Maxillofacial and ENT consultants seeing different types of cases. Consultation times were similar, with PCI group times taking about 1 min longer on average (95% CL for the difference between means was from - 0.7 to + 2.2 min). Using the PCI in routine post-treatment head and neck cancer clinics do not elongate consultations. Recruitment has finished but 12-month follow-up is still ongoing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32488378
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06077-6
pii: 10.1007/s00405-020-06077-6
pmc: PMC7647987
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3435-3447Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PB-PG-0215-36047
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : PB-PG-0215-36047
Références
Rogers SN (2010) Quality of life perspectives in patients with oral cancer. Oral Oncol 46:445–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.021
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.021
pubmed: 20308002
Handle on QOL https://www.handle-on-qol.com/Index.aspx . Accessed 1 Feb 2020
Lee MS, Nelson AM, Thompson LM, Donovan KA (2016) Supportive care needs of oral cancer survivors: prevalence and correlates. Oral Oncol 53:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.11.007
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.11.007
pubmed: 26684544
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Kanatas A (2016) Suitability of the patient concerns inventory as a holistic screening tool in routine head and neck cancer follow-up clinics. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.018
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.01.018
pubmed: 26919767
Shunmugasundaram C, Rutherford C, Butow PN, Sundaresan P, Dhillon HM (2019) Content comparison of unmet needs self-report measures used in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 28:2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5257
doi: 10.1002/pon.5257
pubmed: 31654540
Rogers SN, El-Sheikha J, Lowe D (2009) The development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic. Oral Oncol 45:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.09.004
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.09.004
pubmed: 19028135
Miller N, Rogers SN (2018) A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the Patient Concerns Inventory. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12489
doi: 10.1111/ecc.12489
Allen S, Lowe D, Harris RV, Brown S, Rogers SN (2017) Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:451–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x
doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x
pubmed: 27447962
Rogers SN, Thomson F, Lowe D (2018) The Patient Concerns Inventory integrated as part of routine head and neck cancer follow-up consultations: frequency, case-mix, and items initiated by the patient. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 100:209–215. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2017.0215
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0215
pubmed: 29364010
pmcid: 5930095
Rogers SN, Lowe D (2014) An evaluation of the Head and Neck Cancer Patient Concerns Inventory across the Merseyside and Cheshire Network. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:615–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.011
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2014.04.011
pubmed: 24927654
Ghazali N, Roe B, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2013) Uncovering patients' concerns in routine head and neck oncology follow up clinics: an exploratory study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:294–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.002
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.08.002
pubmed: 22922097
Ghazali N, Roe B, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2015) Patients concerns inventory highlights perceived needs and concerns in head and neck cancer survivors and its impact on health-related quality of life. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.01.022
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.01.022
pubmed: 25708200
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Lowies C, Yeo ST, Allmark C, Mcavery D, Humphris GM, Flavel R, Semple C, Thomas SJ, Kanatas A (2018) Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: a cluster preference randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 18:444. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4355-0
pubmed: 29669529
pmcid: 5907378
Ness AR, Waylen A, Hurley K, Jeffreys M, Penfold C, Pring M, Leary S, Allmark C, Toms S, Ring S, Peters TJ, Hollingworth W, Worthington H, Nutting C, Fisher S, Rogers SN, Thomas SJ, Head, and Neck 5000 Study Team (2014) Establishing a large prospective clinical cohort in people with head and neck cancer as a biomedical resource: head and neck 5000. BMC Cancer 14:973. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-973
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-973
pubmed: 25519023
pmcid: 4301458
https://imd-by-postcode.opendatacommunities.org/imd/2019 . Accessed June 2019
Rogers SN, Gwanne S, Lowe D, Humphris G, Yueh B, Weymuller EA Jr (2002) The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale. Head Neck 24(6):521–529
doi: 10.1002/hed.10106
pubmed: 12112548
Rogers SN, Lowe D, Yueh B, Weymuller EA Jr (2010) The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:352–357. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.32
doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.32
pubmed: 20403851
Rogers SN, Lowe D (2009) Screening for dysfunction to promote multidisciplinary intervention by using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:369–375. https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2009.7
doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.7
pubmed: 19380359
Low C, Fullarton M, Parkinson E, O'Brien K, Jackson SR, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2009) Issues of intimacy and sexual dysfunction following major head and neck cancer treatment. Oral Oncol 45:898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.014
doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.014
pubmed: 19457705
pmcid: 19457705
Rogers SN, Cross B, Talwar C, Lowe D, Humphris G (2016) A single-item screening question for fear of recurrence in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3585-x
doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3585-x
pubmed: 25749490
Hegel MT, Collins ED, Kearing S, Gillock KL, Moore CP, Ahles TA (2008) Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer for depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Psychooncology 17:556–560
doi: 10.1002/pon.1289
pubmed: 17957755
pmcid: 3806281
https://euroqol.org/ . Accessed June 2019.
Ivers NM, Halperin IJ, Barnsley J, Grimshaw JM, Shah BR, Tu K, Upshur R, Zwarenstein M (2012) Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials 13:120. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-120
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-120
pubmed: 22853820
pmcid: 3503622
Assmann SF, Pocock SJ, Enos LE, Kasten LE (2000) Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials. Lancet 355(9209):1064–1069
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02039-0
pubmed: 10744093
Roberts C, Torgerson DJ (1999) Understanding controlled trials: baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials. BMJ 319(7203):185
doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7203.185
pubmed: 10406763
pmcid: 1116277
Spiegelhalter D (2019) The art of statistics: learning from data Pelican books. 2019. Penguin, Random House, UK. ISBN 978-0-241-39863-0
Semple CJ, Lannon D, Qudairat E, McCaughan E, McCormac R (2018) Development and evaluation of a holistic surgical head and neck cancer post-treatment follow-up clinic using touchscreen technology-Feasibility study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 27(2):e12809. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12809
doi: 10.1111/ecc.12809
Allen S, Harris R, Brown SL, Humphris G, Zhou Y, Rogers SN (2018) High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients' communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56(6):536–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.015
doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.05.015
pubmed: 29908705
Fayers PM (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of using PROs in clinical practice: a role for cluster-randomised trials. Qual Life Res 17:1315–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9391-9
doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9391-9
pubmed: 18821031