First postoperative day review in eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy, encirclement and endotamponade to check intraocular pressure: Is it necessary?

Encirclement Intraocular pressure Postoperative review Retinal detachment Vitrectomy

Journal

International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Historique:
received: 17 10 2019
accepted: 22 05 2020
pubmed: 4 6 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 4 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the proportion of patients with raised intraocular pressure (IOP) (≥ 30 mmHg) on the first postoperative day following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), encirclement and endotamponade and assess the number requiring alteration in management to address elevated IOP. To establish whether review on day one is required. Retrospective case note review of consecutive patients who underwent 23-gauge PPV, 276-encirclement and endotamponade under the care of a single surgeon. All patients as standard received prophylactic anti-glaucoma medication post-surgery (eye drops) to take home but initiate only after day-one review. Statistical analysis was carried out using student t tests and Fisher's exact tests. Sixty-six patients were examined over a 2-year period. Mean day-one IOP was 22.2 mmHg (SD 7.3, 95% CI 20.4-24.0). Eleven patients (16.7%) had IOP ≥ 30 mmHg. Five patients (7.6%) had management changing decisions made at the day-one postoperative visit. Lens status, endotamponade, preoperative IOP, surgeon grade, cryopexy versus laser retinopexy or preoperative administration of once only 500 mg dose of intravenous acetazolamide did not influence IOP, with no significant difference between these subgroups. No cases of hypotony occurred. A significant minority of patients had elevation of IOP above 30 mmHg, a number of whom required treatment changes to address this. No preoperative risk factors were identified indicating those at risk of high IOP. It is important to identify these potentially harmful IOP elevations, and therefore day-one review is imperative and should be continued.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32488595
doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01438-w
pii: 10.1007/s10792-020-01438-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2577-2583

Références

Brennan N, Reekie I, Ezra E, Barton K, Viswanathan A, Muqit MM (2017) The role of day one postoperative review of intraocular pressure in modern vitrectomy surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 101:1281–1284
doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309664
Alexander P, Michaels L, Newsom R (2015) Is day-1 postoperative review necessary after pars plana vitrectomy? Eye 29:1489–1494
doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.134
Wong R, Gupta B, Williamson TH, Laidlaw DA (2011) Day 1 postoperative intraocular pressure spike in vitreoretinal surgery (VDOP1). Acta Ophthalmol 89:365–368
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01703.x
Rahman R, Marler J, Stephenson J, Gillibrand W (2017) Risk factors for elevated intraocular pressure on first day postoperative review following pars plana vitrectomy. J VitreoRetinal Dis 1:397–400
doi: 10.1177/2474126417724655
Hasegawa Y, Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, Oshika T (2014) Intraocular pressure elevation after vitrectomy for various vitreoretinal disorders. Eur J Ophthalmol 24:235–241
doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000350
Gosse E, Newsom R, Hall P, Lochhead J (2013) Changes in day 1 post-operative intraocular pressure following sutureless 23-gauge and conventional 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Open Ophthalmol J 7:42–47
doi: 10.2174/1874364101307010042
Yang HK, Woo SJ, Park KH, Park KH (2010) Intraocular pressure changes after vitrectomy with and without combined phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Korean J Ophthalmol 24:341–346
doi: 10.3341/kjo.2010.24.6.341
Xu P, Xia T, Chen J (2017) Early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation after vitreoretinal surgery. J Clini Exp Ophthalmol 08:1–4
doi: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000636
Framme C, Klotz S, Wolf-Schnurrbusch UE, Wiedemann P, Wolf S (2012) Intraocular pressure changes following 20G pars-plana vitrectomy. Acta Ophthalmol 90:744–749
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02251.x
Han DP, Lewis H, Lambrou FH Jr, Mieler WF, Hartz A (1989) Mechanisms of intraocular pressure elevation after pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 96:1357–1362
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(89)32715-1
Chang S, Lincoff HA, Coleman DJ, Fuchs W, Farber ME (1985) Perfluorocarbon gases in vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 92:651–656
doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(85)33985-4
Isernhagen RD, Michels RG, Glaser BM, de Bustros S, Enger C (1989) Hospitalization requirements after vitreoretinal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 106:767–770
doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060130837035
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists [internet]. National Electronic Retinal Detachment Surgery Audit: Feasibility Report. https://www.nodaudit.org.uk/u/docs/20/kxmnfevalz/Retinal%20Detachment%20Surgery%20Audit%20Feasibility%20Report.pdf [Accessesd 1 March 2019]
American Academy of Ophthalmology [internet]. Idiopathic Macular Hole Preferred Practice Pattern. https://www.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/idiopathic-macular-hole-ppp-updated-2017 [Accessed on 1 March 2019]
Oshika T, Araie M (1990) Time course of changes in aqueous protein concentration and flow rate after oral acetazolamide. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 31:527–534
pubmed: 2318591
Fogagnolo P, Centofanti M, Figus M, Frezzotti P, Fea A, Ligorio P et al (2012) Short-term changes in intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmologica 228:154–158
doi: 10.1159/000337838
Radius RL, Maumenee AE (1977) Visual field changes following acute elevation of intraocular pressure. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83:61–68
pubmed: 898476
Pohjalainen T, Vesti E, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L (2001) Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in eyes with open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 79:313–316
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.790322.x
Yasutani H, Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Hayashi F (2004) Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification surgery in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:1219–1224
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2002.11.001

Auteurs

Craig Wilde (C)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. craig_wilde@hotmail.com.

Palvi Bhardwaj (P)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Anthony King (A)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Dharmalingam Kumudhan (D)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Alex Foss (A)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Gavin Orr (G)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Anwar Zaman (A)

Ophthalmology Department, B Floor, EENT Centre, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH