Visual working memory enhances target discrimination accuracy with single-item displays.
Priming
Target signal
Visual perception
Visual working memory
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
11
11
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The maintenance of information in visual working memory has been shown to bias the concurrent processing in favor of matching visual input. The present study aimed to examine whether this bias can act at an early stage of processing to enhance target feature perception in single-item displays. Participants were sequentially presented with two distinct colored stimuli as memory samples and a retro-cue indicating which of the two samples should be maintained for subsequent memory test. During the retention interval, they had to discriminate the gap orientation of a Landolt target presented through a single visual stimulus that could match one or neither of the two samples. Across two experiments, we consistently found that discrimination performance was more accurate when the Landolt target was situated within a stimulus that matched the sample being retained in visual working memory, as compared with when the target was not. This effect cannot be attributed to the mechanism of passive priming, because we failed to observe priming effects when the stimulus containing the target matched the sample that was retro-cued to be irrelevant to the working memory task, as compared to when the stimulus matched neither sample. Given the fact that target stimuli were presented in single-item displays wherein external noise was precluded, the present findings demonstrate that the working memory bias of visual attention operating in the absence of stimulus competition facilitates early perceptual processing at the attended location via signal enhancement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32488644
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02041-y
pii: 10.3758/s13414-020-02041-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3005-3012Subventions
Organisme : the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
ID : 20NDJC169YB
Organisme : the College of Education at the Hangzhou Normal University
ID : 19JYXK004
Références
Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Reading for meaning: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33, 415–437.
doi: 10.1080/14640748108400801
Carrasco, M., Williams, P. E., & Yeshurun, Y. (2002). Covert attention increases spatial resolution with or without masks: Support for signal enhancement. Journal of Vision, 2, 467–479.
doi: 10.1167/2.6.4
Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2011). The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 996–1002.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0093-y
Dosher, B. A., & Lu, Z. L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial attention. Psychological Science, 11, 139–146.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00229
Dowd, E. W., Nag, S., & Golomb, F. D. (2019). Working memory-driven attention towards a distractor does not interfere with target feature perception. Visual Cognition, 27, 714–731.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2019.1659895
Eckstein, M. P. (1998). The lower efficiency for conjunctions is due to noise and not serial attentional processing. Psychological Science, 9, 111–118.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00020
Gayet, S., van Maanen, L., Heilbron, M., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Visual input that matches the content of visual working memory requires less (not faster) evidence sampling to reach conscious access. Journal of Vision, 16(11):26, 1–20.
Gayet, S., Guggenmos, M., Christophel, T. B., Haynes, J. D., Paffen, C. L. E., Van der Stigchel, S., & Sterzer, P. (2017). Visual working memory enhances the neural response to matching visual input. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 6638–6647.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3418-16.2017
Gayet, S., Paffen, C. L. E., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2018). Visual working memory storage recruits sensory processing areas. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 189–190.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.011
Han, S. W. (2015). Working memory contents enhance perception under stimulus-driven competition. Memory & Cognition, 43, 432–440.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0460-8
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458, 632–635.
doi: 10.1038/nature07832
Hollingworth, A., Matsukura, M., & Luck, S. J. (2013). Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets. Psychological Science, 24, 790–796.
doi: 10.1177/0956797612459767
Jung, K., Han, S. W., & Min, Y. (2020). Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 105–113.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01630-9
Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 228–242.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
doi: 10.3758/BF03210951
Pan, Y., Cheng, Q.-P., & Luo, Q.-Y. (2012). Working memory can enhance unconscious visual perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 477–482.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0219-9
Pan, Y., Luo, Q., & Cheng, M. (2016). Working memory-driven attention improves spatial resolution: Support for perceptual enhancement. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 1625–1632.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1138-z
Pan, Y., Han, Y., & Zuo, W. (2019). The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2722–2731.
Pan, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zuo, W. (2019). The contents of visual working memory delay the perceived offset of matching visual stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 201, 102954.
Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., & Park, S. (2005). Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 73–92.
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.73
Schneegans, S., Spencer, J. P., Schöner, G., Hwang, S., & Hollingworth, A. (2014). Dynamic interactions between visual working memory and saccade target selection. Journal of Vision, 14(11):9, 1–23.
Serences, J. T., Ester, E. F., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20, 207–214.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02276.x
Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing in identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037–1054.
Silvanto, J., & Cattaneo, Z. (2010). Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals the content of visual short-term memory in the visual cortex. NeuroImage, 50, 1683–1689.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.021
Smith, D. T., & Lane, A. R. (2017). Working memory enhances target detection in the blind hemifield. Visual Cognition, 25, 4–9.
doi: 10.1080/13506285.2016.1244137
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Seeing the content of the mind: Enhanced awareness through working memory in patients with visual extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 4789–4792.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510718103
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248–261.
pubmed: 15826228
Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46, 1010–1018.
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008
Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Rotshtein P. (2007). Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 17186–17191.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703706104
Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
Soto, D., Wriglesworth, A., Bahrami-Balani, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Working memory enhances visual perception: Evidence from single detection analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 441–456.
pubmed: 20192541