Accuracy and precision of zero-heat-flux temperature measurements with the 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anesthesia
Measurement
Surgery
Temperature
Zero-heat-flux
Journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
ISSN: 1573-2614
Titre abrégé: J Clin Monit Comput
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9806357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
20
03
2020
accepted:
29
05
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Zero-heat-flux thermometers provide clinicians with the ability to continuously and non-invasively monitor body temperature. These devices are increasingly being used to substitute for more invasive core temperature measurements during surgery and in critical care. The aim of this review was to determine the accuracy and precision of zero-heat-flux temperature measurements from the 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System. Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies that reported on a measurement of core or peripheral temperature that coincided with a measurement from the zero-heat-flux device. Study selection and quality assessment was performed independently using the Revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to summarize the strength of the evidence. Pooled estimates of the mean bias and limits of agreement with outer 95% confidence intervals (population limits of agreement) were calculated. Sixteen studies were included. The primary meta-analysis of zero-heat-flux versus core temperature consisted of 22 comparisons from 16 individual studies. Data from 952 participants with 314,137 paired measurements were included. The pooled estimate for the mean bias was 0.03 °C. Population limits of agreement, which take into consideration the between-study heterogeneity and sampling error, were wide, spanning from - 0.93 to 0.98 °C. The GRADE evidence quality rating was downgraded to moderate due to concerns about study limitations. Population limits of agreement for the sensitivity analysis restricted to studies rated as having low risk of bias across all the domains of the QUADAS-2 were similar to the primary analysis. The range of uncertainty in the accuracy of a thermometer should be taken into account when using this device to inform clinical decision-making. Clinicians should therefore consider the potential that a temperature measurement from a 3M™ Bair Hugger™ Temperature Monitoring System could be as much as 1 °C higher or lower than core temperature. Use of this device may not be appropriate in situations where a difference in temperature of less than 1 °C is important to detect.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32488679
doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00543-6
pii: 10.1007/s10877-020-00543-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
39-49Références
Frank SM, Fleisher LA, Breslow MJ, et al. Perioperative maintenance of normothermia reduces the incidence of morbid cardiac events: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 1997;277:1127–34.
doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540380041029
Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1209–16.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605093341901
Michelson AD, MacGregor H, Barnard MR, et al. Reversible inhibition of human platelet activation by hypothermia in vivo and in vitro. Thrombos Haemost. 1994;72:633–40.
Rohrer MJ, Natale AM. Effect of hypothermia on the coagulation cascade. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:1402–5.
doi: 10.1097/00003246-199210000-00007
Hadian M, Pinsky MR. Evidence-based review of the use of the pulmonary artery catheter: impact data and complications. Crit Care. 2006;10:S8.
doi: 10.1186/cc4834
Riley C, Andrzejowski J. Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. BJA Educ. 2018;18:227–33.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.05.003
Eshraghi Y, Nasr V, Parra-Sanchez I, et al. An evaluation of a zero-heat-flux cutaneous thermometer in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analges. 2014;119:543–9.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000319
Sessler M, Daniel I. Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:318–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f6d76 .
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f6d76
pubmed: 18648241
pmcid: 2614355
Yamakage M, Namiki A. Deep temperature monitoring using a zero-heat-flow method. J Anesth. 2003;17:108–15.
doi: 10.1007/s005400300026
Mann R, Gilbody SM. Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression. Syst Rev. 2012;1:9.
doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-9
Preston L, Carroll C, Gardois P, et al. Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to medline, embase and reference checking. Syst Rev. 2015;4:82.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7
Myles PS, Cui J. I. Using the bland–altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:309–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem214 .
doi: 10.1093/bja/aem214
pubmed: 17702826
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G. Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511543500
Begg CB. Systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies require study by study examination: first for heterogeneity, and then for sources of heterogeneity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:865.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.006
Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:882–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016
Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336:1106–10.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE
Tipton E, Shuster J. A framework for the meta-analysis of bland–altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach. Stat Med. 2017;36:3621–35.
doi: 10.1002/sim.7352
Hedges LV, Tipton E, Johnson MC. Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:39–65.
doi: 10.1002/jrsm.5
Tanner-Smith EE, Tipton E, Polanin JR. Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: a tutorial in r. J Dev Life-Course Criminol. 2016;2:85–112.
doi: 10.1007/s40865-016-0026-5
Tipton E. Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. Psychol Methods. 2015;20:375.
doi: 10.1037/met0000011
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
Core Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.
Boisson M, Alaux A, Kerforne T, et al. Intra-operative cutaneous temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technique (3M spoton) in comparison with oesophageal and arterial temperature: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol (EJA). 2018;35:825–30.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000822
Dahyot-Fizelier C, Lamarche S, Kerforne T, et al. Accuracy of zero-heat-flux cutaneous temperature in intensive care adults. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:e715–e717717. https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000002317 .
doi: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002317
pubmed: 28410347
Schell-Chaple HM, Liu KD, Matthay MA, Puntillo KA. Rectal and bladder temperatures vs forehead core temperatures measured with SpotOn monitoring system. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27:43–50. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2018865 .
doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018865
pubmed: 29292274
Mäkinen M-T, Pesonen A, Jousela I, et al. Novel zero-heat-flux deep body temperature measurement in lower extremity vascular and cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30:973–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.141 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.141
pubmed: 27521967
West N, Cooke E, Morse D, et al. Zero-heat-flux core temperature monitoring system: an observational secondary analysis to evaluate agreement with naso-/oropharyngeal probe during anesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00411-y .
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00411-y
pubmed: 31696391
Pesonen E, Silvasti-Lundell M, Niemi TT, et al. The focus of temperature monitoring with zero-heat-flux technology (3M bair-hugger): a clinical study with patients undergoing craniotomy. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018;33:917–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-018-0227-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0227-z
pubmed: 30467673
pmcid: 6710334
Iden T, Horn E-P, Bein B, et al. Intraoperative temperature monitoring with zero heat flux technology (3M SpotOn sensor) in comparison with sublingual and nasopharyngeal temperature. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015;32:387–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000232 .
doi: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000232
pubmed: 25693138
Lim H, Kim B, Kim DC, Lee SK, Ko S. A comparison of the temperature difference according to the placement of a nasopharyngeal temperature probe. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016;69:357–61. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2016.69.4.357 .
doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.4.357
pubmed: 27482312
pmcid: 4967630
Cullen S, Brown J. Measuring core temperature-an audit:47. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(S3):11–101.
Vendrell JM, Lacambra BM, Bassas PE, et al. Zero-heat-flux cutaneous thermometer for core temperature measurements in extreme situations. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2016;228:S33.
Carvalho H, Najafi N, Poelaert J. Intra-operative temperature monitoring with cutaneous zero-heat- flux-thermometry in comparison with oesophageal temperature: a prospective study in the paediatric population. Pediatr Anesth. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13653 .
doi: 10.1111/pan.13653
Gomez-Romero FJ, Fernandez-Prada M, Fernandez-Suarez FE, et al. Intra-operative temperature monitoring with two non-invasive devices (3M spoton and dräger tcore) in comparison with the swan-ganz catheter. Cirugia Cardiovascu. 2019;26:191–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.circv.2019.06.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.circv.2019.06.002
Idei M, Nomura T, Yamamoto N, et al. An evaluation and accuracy of new zero-heat-flux thermometer (3M SpotOn) in pediatric intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2016;33:140.
Jack JM, Ellicott H, Jones CI, et al. Determining the accuracy of zero-flux and ingestible thermometers in the peri-operative setting. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019;33:1113–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00252-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00252-9
pubmed: 30623279
Kato H, Kawashima S, Mimuro S, et al. An evaluation of deep-forehead temperature (spoton) in ICU patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a111 .
doi: 10.1186/2197-425x-3-s1-a111
pmcid: 4798343
Kollmann AC, Brogly N, Alsina E, et al. Validation of the zero-heat-flux thermometer (spoton) in major gynecological surgery to monitor intraoperative core temperature: a comparative study with esophageal core temperature. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:351–7.
Morettini E, Turchini F, Tofani L, et al. Intraoperative core temperature monitoring: accuracy and precision of zero-heat flux heated controlled servo sensor compared with esophageal temperature during major surgery: the ESOSPOT study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00410-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00410-z
pubmed: 31673946
Tachibana S, Chida Y, Yamakage M. Using the bair hugger temperature monitoring system in neck and chest regions: a pilot study. JA Clin Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-019-0252-z .
doi: 10.1186/s40981-019-0252-z
pubmed: 32026970
pmcid: 6967033
Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB, et al. Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:768–77.
doi: 10.7326/M15-1150
Evron S, Weissman A, Toivis V, et al. Evaluation of the temple touch pro, a novel noninvasive core-temperature monitoring system. Anesth Analges. 2017;125:103–9.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001695