Ernst Haeckel, Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay and the racial controversy over the Papuans.
Darwinian anthropology
Ernst Haeckel
History of biology
Nikolai Miklucho-Maclay
Racial theories
Stationary field studies
the Papuans
Journal
Frontiers in zoology
ISSN: 1742-9994
Titre abrégé: Front Zool
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101231669
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
02
02
2020
accepted:
30
03
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The "German Darwin" Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919) was a key figure during the first "Darwinian revolution", a time when the foundations of the modern evolutionary theory were laid. It was Haeckel, who crucially contributed to the visualization of the Darwinian theory by designing "genealogical-trees" illustrating the evolution of various species, including humans. Although the idea of explaining human evolution by natural selection belongs to Darwin, Haeckel was the first who attempted to create a new exact anthropology based on the Darwinian method. Trying to immediately reconstruct human evolution proceeding from the description of modern populations led Haeckel to the views which, from the contemporary perspective, are definitely racist. Haeckel created racial anthropology intending to prove human origins from a lower organism, but without the intention of establishing a discriminatory racial praxis. Although hierarchical in its outcome, the Haeckelian method did not presuppose the necessity of a racial hierarchy of currently living humans. It is crucial to grasp in what sense Haeckel's theoretical explorations in human evolution were racist, and in what sense they were not. Our argument flows as follows. One of Haeckel's pupils was the Russian ethnographer, anthropologist and zoologist Nikolai Nikolajewitsch Miklucho-Maclay (1846-1888). Maclay and Haeckel worked closely together for several years; they traveled jointly and Maclay had enough time to learn the major methodological principles of Haeckel's research. Yet in contrast to Haeckel, Maclay is regarded as one of the first scientific anti-racists, who came to anti-racist views using empirical field studies in Papua-New Guinea. We claim that while conducting these studies Maclay applied scientific principles to a significant extent acquired from Haeckel. The paper contributes to the view that Haeckel's theoretical racism did not follow the Darwinian method he used.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The "German Darwin" Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919) was a key figure during the first "Darwinian revolution", a time when the foundations of the modern evolutionary theory were laid. It was Haeckel, who crucially contributed to the visualization of the Darwinian theory by designing "genealogical-trees" illustrating the evolution of various species, including humans. Although the idea of explaining human evolution by natural selection belongs to Darwin, Haeckel was the first who attempted to create a new exact anthropology based on the Darwinian method.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Trying to immediately reconstruct human evolution proceeding from the description of modern populations led Haeckel to the views which, from the contemporary perspective, are definitely racist. Haeckel created racial anthropology intending to prove human origins from a lower organism, but without the intention of establishing a discriminatory racial praxis. Although hierarchical in its outcome, the Haeckelian method did not presuppose the necessity of a racial hierarchy of currently living humans. It is crucial to grasp in what sense Haeckel's theoretical explorations in human evolution were racist, and in what sense they were not. Our argument flows as follows. One of Haeckel's pupils was the Russian ethnographer, anthropologist and zoologist Nikolai Nikolajewitsch Miklucho-Maclay (1846-1888). Maclay and Haeckel worked closely together for several years; they traveled jointly and Maclay had enough time to learn the major methodological principles of Haeckel's research. Yet in contrast to Haeckel, Maclay is regarded as one of the first scientific anti-racists, who came to anti-racist views using empirical field studies in Papua-New Guinea.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We claim that while conducting these studies Maclay applied scientific principles to a significant extent acquired from Haeckel. The paper contributes to the view that Haeckel's theoretical racism did not follow the Darwinian method he used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32489391
doi: 10.1186/s12983-020-00358-w
pii: 358
pmc: PMC7247218
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
16Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsNo
Références
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 16;29(24):R1276-R1284
pubmed: 31846669
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 Feb;22(2):99-102
pubmed: 28065652
Theory Biosci. 2013 Dec;132(4):207-14
pubmed: 23982797
Theory Biosci. 2013 Dec;132(4):289-97
pubmed: 24022180
Nature. 2010 Dec 23;468(7327):1053-60
pubmed: 21179161
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug;34(8):681-683
pubmed: 31104953
Theory Biosci. 2019 May;138(1):89-103
pubmed: 30868432
Nature. 2010 Apr 8;464(7290):894-7
pubmed: 20336068
Theory Biosci. 2019 May;138(1):1-7
pubmed: 30799517
Theory Biosci. 2017 Jun;136(1-2):19-29
pubmed: 28224466
Curr Biol. 2016 May 9;26(9):1241-7
pubmed: 27032491
Nature. 2016 Nov 30;540(7631):38
pubmed: 27905437
Theory Biosci. 2019 May;138(1):73-88
pubmed: 30847842
Endeavour. 2014 Sep-Dec;38(3-4):268-79
pubmed: 25455543
Theory Biosci. 2015 Jun;134(1-2):9-15
pubmed: 25916274
Theory Biosci. 2019 May;138(1):189-202
pubmed: 30868428
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2015;36(3):357-70
pubmed: 26013194