The FRAIL-FIT study: Frailty's relationship with adverse-event incidence in the longer term, at one year following intensive care unit treatment - A retrospective observational cohort study.
Clinical Frailty Scale
frail
intensive care unit
mortality
Journal
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
ISSN: 1751-1437
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Soc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101538668
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Frailty is a syndrome of decreased reserve and heightened vulnerability. Frailty scoring has potential to facilitate more informed decisions in the intensive care unit. To validate this, its relationship with outcomes must be tested extensively. This study aimed to investigate frailty's impact on adverse outcomes after intensive care unit admission, primarily one-year mortality. This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study examined prospectively collected data from 400 intensive care unit patients. Frailty was assessed using the Clinical Frailty Scale and defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses tested the relationships of frailty, covariates and outcomes. Of 400 eligible patients, 111 (27.8%) were frail and 289 (72.3%) were non-frail. Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients were older (62 vs. 56, p < 0.001) and had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (22 vs. 19, p < 0.001). Females were more likely to be frail than males (34.1% vs. 22.9% frail, p = 0.018). Frail patients were less likely to survive the intensive care unit (p = 0.03), hospital (p = 0.003) or to one year (p < 0.001). Frailty significantly increased one-year mortality hazards in unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.96; 95% confidence interval 1.41-2.72; p < 0.001) and covariate adjusted analyses (hazard ratio 1.41; 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.98; p = 0.0497). Frail patients had more hospital admissions (p = 0.014) and longer hospital stays within both one year before (p = 0.002) and one year after intensive care unit admission (p = 0.012). Frailty was common and associated with greater age, female gender, higher sickness severity and more healthcare use. Frailty was significantly associated with greater risks of mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Frailty scoring is a promising tool which could improve decision making in intensive care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32489408
doi: 10.1177/1751143719838212
pii: 10.1177_1751143719838212
pmc: PMC7238472
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
124-133Informations de copyright
© The Intensive Care Society 2019.
Références
CMAJ. 2014 Feb 4;186(2):E95-102
pubmed: 24277703
J Crit Care. 2014 Jun;29(3):401-8
pubmed: 24559575
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Dec;70(12):1586-94
pubmed: 26400736
Crit Care. 2016 Jun 06;20(1):175
pubmed: 27263535
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):301
pubmed: 21345259
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Nov;41(11):1911-20
pubmed: 26306719
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):28
pubmed: 28107813
Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29
pubmed: 3928249
ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Aug 08;1:323-36
pubmed: 12806071
CMAJ. 2011 May 17;183(8):E487-94
pubmed: 21540166
Ageing Res Rev. 2011 Jan;10(1):104-14
pubmed: 20850567
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 May;43(3):361-8
pubmed: 25943611
Circulation. 2010 Mar 2;121(8):973-8
pubmed: 20159833
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1121-8
pubmed: 26096386
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):674-82
pubmed: 24651884
BMC Geriatr. 2008 Sep 30;8:24
pubmed: 18826625
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1769-75
pubmed: 8190152
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):255-63
pubmed: 15031310
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1105-1122
pubmed: 28676896
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1820-1828
pubmed: 28936626