Exploring perceived costs and benefits of first aid for youth with depression: a qualitative study of Japanese undergraduates.
Cost and benefit
Depression
Economic perspectives
Helping behavior
Japanese
Motivation
Qualitative study
Youth Mental Health First Aid
Journal
International journal of mental health systems
ISSN: 1752-4458
Titre abrégé: Int J Ment Health Syst
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101294224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
06
2019
accepted:
16
05
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early interventions for depression among youth are greatly needed. Although Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) program has been developed to teach the public how to help young people with mental disorders, including depression, it has assumed human altruism and overlooked the possibility that participants would experience conflict between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors. The present qualitative study, therefore, initially explored content of the costs and benefits perceived by youth in terms of helping their peers with depression. A total of 56 Japanese undergraduates (32 female, 24 male; The supplemental quantitative analyses (i.e., ANOVA and post hoc analyses) on the numbers of labels highlighted that the participants perceived suppressors (i.e., These results provide evidence for how young people experience the conflicts between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors toward their peers with depression and reveal specific content of these costs and benefits. These findings could serve as a basis for extending YMHFA programs and designing educational content to promote public helping behaviors in realistic situations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early interventions for depression among youth are greatly needed. Although Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) program has been developed to teach the public how to help young people with mental disorders, including depression, it has assumed human altruism and overlooked the possibility that participants would experience conflict between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors. The present qualitative study, therefore, initially explored content of the costs and benefits perceived by youth in terms of helping their peers with depression.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 56 Japanese undergraduates (32 female, 24 male;
RESULTS
RESULTS
The supplemental quantitative analyses (i.e., ANOVA and post hoc analyses) on the numbers of labels highlighted that the participants perceived suppressors (i.e.,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These results provide evidence for how young people experience the conflicts between the costs and benefits of helping behaviors toward their peers with depression and reveal specific content of these costs and benefits. These findings could serve as a basis for extending YMHFA programs and designing educational content to promote public helping behaviors in realistic situations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32489419
doi: 10.1186/s13033-020-00366-7
pii: 366
pmc: PMC7247138
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
34Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
BMC Psychiatry. 2005 Feb 06;5:9
pubmed: 15694008
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 Jan 27;5(1):4
pubmed: 21272345
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617-27
pubmed: 15939839
Appetite. 2009 Dec;53(3):407-13
pubmed: 19712716
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan;70(1):62-70
pubmed: 26303330
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):93-104
pubmed: 14992636
Health Commun. 2016;31(1):102-16
pubmed: 26086674
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1257-65
pubmed: 20938638
Med J Aust. 1997 Feb 17;166(4):182-6
pubmed: 9066546
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;155(8):1092-6
pubmed: 9699699
Lancet. 2011 Jun 18;377(9783):2093-102
pubmed: 21652063
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 02;1:163
pubmed: 21833228
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;192(2):144-9
pubmed: 18245033
Med J Aust. 2007 Nov 19;187(10):556-60
pubmed: 18021042
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):890-903
pubmed: 17059308
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Feb;86(2):265-84
pubmed: 14769083
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010 Oct;64(5):531-40
pubmed: 20727109
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):513-32
pubmed: 22023711
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):907-22
pubmed: 20674114
Psychol Rep. 2015 Apr;116(2):337-62
pubmed: 25748084
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jan;60(1):83-97
pubmed: 23106820
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 May;192(5):362-7
pubmed: 18450661
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;177:4-7
pubmed: 10945080
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(6):610-24
pubmed: 23905716
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:365-92
pubmed: 15709940
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):290-2
pubmed: 14551436
J Affect Disord. 2008 Jan;105(1-3):157-65
pubmed: 17574684
BMC Psychiatry. 2002 Oct 01;2:10
pubmed: 12359045
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Jan 19;10:3
pubmed: 26788123
BMC Psychiatry. 2010 Dec 30;10:113
pubmed: 21192795
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Psychol Serv. 2016 May;13(2):121-126
pubmed: 27148946
Med J Aust. 2007 Oct 1;187(S7):S35-9
pubmed: 17908023
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;2(1):55-61
pubmed: 21352133
Schizophr Bull. 1999;25(3):447-56
pubmed: 10478780
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 21;18(1):45
pubmed: 29562906
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Sep;38(9):526-34
pubmed: 14504738
Psychol Bull. 1995 May;117(3):497-529
pubmed: 7777651
Am Psychol. 2012 Apr;67(3):231-43
pubmed: 22040221
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014 Jun;23(2):167-76
pubmed: 23867112
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
BMC Psychiatry. 2006 May 23;6:21
pubmed: 16716231
Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Jul;152(7):1026-32
pubmed: 7793438
J Adolesc Health. 2014 Nov;55(5):612-9
pubmed: 25043834
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2011 May 19;5:12
pubmed: 21592409