The Effect of Age on Corneal Topographic Indices, Keratometry and Visual Acuity After Combined Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment (ICRS) Implantation and Corneal Crosslinking.

Crosslinking Intracorneal Ring Segment Keratoconus Pediatric Keratoconus

Journal

Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal
ISSN: 2322-4436
Titre abrégé: Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101611331

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
entrez: 4 6 2020
pubmed: 4 6 2020
medline: 4 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We aimed to assess age-related changes in corneal topographic indices, keratometry and visual acuity after sequential intracorneal ring segment implantation (ICRS) and crosslinking (CXL). This was a retrospective matched case-control series including 26 eyes of patients ≤18 years as cases and 26 eyes of adult patients as controls. All eyes received ICRS+CXL for progressive keratoconus. Eyes were matched regarding the keratoconus parameters and the treatment (type, number and thickness of ICRS). Data was analyzed for refractive and topographic values (uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA; CDVA) sphere; cylinder; spherical equivalent; maximum keratometry (Kmax); flat keratometry (Kflat); steep keratometry (Ksteep); all 7 pentacam topographic indices) preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Preoperatively, there was no significant difference for any refractive, clinical or topographic parameters between the groups except for index of vertical asymmetry. After one year, children had a significantly higher improvement in Ksteep (3.05D) than adults (2.10D; P=0.036) and a trend to significance for Kflat (2.7D compared to 1.78D, respectively; P=0.081). UDVA improved by 4.3 ETDRS lines in children compared to 3.3 ETDRS lines in adults and CDVA improved by 1.7 ETDRS lines in children compared to 1.2 ETDRS lines in adults, but with no statistical significance. The effects on keratometry indicated that corneal response after ICRS and CXL for keratoconus is more pronounced in young patients than adults. This assumption is also supported by functional improvement and by the fact that a few eyes (5) of some very young patients (<13years) showed highly remarkable improvements after surgery (higher than any adult eye).

Identifiants

pubmed: 32490020
pmc: PMC7134240

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

135-142

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Author(s).

Références

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Feb;24(2):196-201
pubmed: 9530594
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):908-16
pubmed: 23290750
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):830-839
pubmed: 30928252
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2084-91
pubmed: 19969212
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;154(1):56-62.e1
pubmed: 22534107
Cornea. 2006 Jan;25(1):16-25
pubmed: 16331035
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5337-47
pubmed: 17122122
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 14;13(12):e0208608
pubmed: 30550575
J AAPOS. 2015 Jun;19(3):228-32
pubmed: 26059667
J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):753-8
pubmed: 23347367
Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1738-44
pubmed: 7936572
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;154(3):520-6
pubmed: 22633357
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4324-9
pubmed: 20847118
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 May;135(5):620-7
pubmed: 12719068
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:2019-30
pubmed: 24143069
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 18;10(3):348-354
pubmed: 28393023
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jul;91(7):984-5
pubmed: 17576720
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Jul;113(7):870-4
pubmed: 7605277
J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):793-9
pubmed: 23347374
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;33(6):528-538
pubmed: 31833250
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1282-90
pubmed: 21700105
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Mar 20;1138(3):222-8
pubmed: 1547284
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;178:51-57
pubmed: 28341606
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2013 Summer;2(2):35-40
pubmed: 24600640
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Mar;74(3):147-51
pubmed: 9159804
J Refract Surg. 2016 Aug 1;32(8):534-41
pubmed: 27505314
J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):759-62
pubmed: 23347368
Eye Contact Lens. 2014 Nov;40(6):365-70
pubmed: 25320956

Auteurs

Sylvain El-Khoury (S)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild, Department of Pediatrics and Retina, Paris, France.
Authors contributed equally.

Youssef Abdelmassih (Y)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild, Department of Pediatrics and Retina, Paris, France.
Authors contributed equally.

Mazen Amro (M)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
School of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Ali Dirani (A)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

Carol Cherfan (C)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.

Elias Jarade (E)

Beirut Eye Specialist Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mediclinic Dubai Mall, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Classifications MeSH