Cerebral microbleeds and acute myocardial infarction: Screening and disease progression.
3 months
Acute myocardial infarction
Anticoagulant treatment
Cerebral MRI
Cerebral microbleeds
Journal
International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature
ISSN: 2352-9067
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 101649525
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
revised:
29
04
2020
accepted:
01
05
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cerebral microbleeds (CMB) are associated with intracerebral haemorrhage. Therefore they may represent a concern if anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy is needed. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of CMB in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to follow their progression at 3 months under dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). This prospective study included patients aged over 60 hospitalized in intensive cardiac care unit in our city for AMI. These patients underwent a first brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within 72 h of admission, that was repeated 3 months. 108 patients were included between November 2016 and December 2018. The prevalence of CMB was 21.3%, with a female predominance of 65.2% vs 32.1% (p = 0.004). Diabetes is significantly associated with the presence of CMB, 45.5% vs 21.2% (p = 0.021). Patients with at least one acute CMB had higher haemorrhagic risk as evaluated with CRUSADE score (40.5 ± 13.6 vs 31.2 ± 14.8 (p = 0.004).Multivariate analysis showed that only female sex was associated with the presence of a CMB on the initial MRI. On repeated MRI, an increase in CMB was observed in 6% of patients.Our results suggest that discharge treatment with anticoagulant in combination with antiplatelet therapy may be an independent predictor of early progression of CMB. Our study confirms the high prevalence of CMB in patients over 60 years with AMI. The association of anticoagulant with DAPT, 3 months after stenting, may be an independent factor of CMB progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32490144
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100531
pii: S2352-9067(20)30069-5
pii: 100531
pmc: PMC7262454
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100531Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;115(9):1682-5
pubmed: 23623660
Stroke. 2014 Dec;45(12):3514-20
pubmed: 25370585
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(3-4):186-191
pubmed: 28208146
Can J Neurol Sci. 2011 Nov;38(6):863-8
pubmed: 22030424
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Jul;25(7):1671-1677
pubmed: 27067881
J Neurol. 2019 Oct 15;:
pubmed: 31616992
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Dec;24(12):2728-37
pubmed: 26342996
Int J Stroke. 2019 Apr;14(3):270-281
pubmed: 30058959
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jun;17(6):539-547
pubmed: 29778365
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Aug;33(8):998-1005
pubmed: 28669702
Circ J. 2011;75(2):451-6
pubmed: 21157110
Neurol Res. 2015 Nov;37(11):993-7
pubmed: 26391570
Brain. 2007 Aug;130(Pt 8):1988-2003
pubmed: 17322562
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Jun;24(6):1373-7
pubmed: 25847305
Stroke. 2010 Oct;41(10 Suppl):S103-6
pubmed: 20876479
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 17;67(19):2224-2234
pubmed: 27079334
Stroke. 2014 May;45(5):1492-4
pubmed: 24713533