Gender differentials in technical efficiency of Ghanaian cocoa farms.
Agricultural economics
Agricultural policy
Agricultural technology
Cocoa
Double-bootstrapped DEA procedure
Economics
Environmental economics
Gender decomposition
Neumark approach
Technical efficiency
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2019
revised:
29
03
2020
accepted:
14
05
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study considers the presence of a gender gap in technical efficiency in Ghana's cocoa production sector. The two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis (DEA) procedure was applied to estimate the bias-corrected technical efficiency scores for male and female cocoa farm managers. The results indicate that there is a potential for male and female cocoa farm managers to increase output without altering the quantities of inputs employed. Applying the extended version of the Blinder-Oaxaca (B-O) decomposition approach, the findings suggest that female plot managers are, on average, less technically efficient compared to their male counterparts. This gap could be linked to differences in their resource endowments. Nevertheless, there are still significant unobservable factors that contribute to the gender efficiency gap. A comprehensive decomposition examination indicates that differences in educational attainment, engagement in non-farm activities, and farm size may contribute to the unexplained technical efficiency gap. The study recommends that female-sensitive programmes that seek to encourage the participation of non-farm activities and provide access to education and land utilization are essential in reducing the gender gap in technical efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32490238
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04012
pii: S2405-8440(20)30856-2
pii: e04012
pmc: PMC7260293
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e04012Informations de copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Environ Manage. 2014 Aug;54(2):288-300
pubmed: 24929929