Reverse shoulder replacement: a day-case procedure.
Shoulder
arthroplasty
glenohumeral joint
osteoarthritis shoulder
outpatient surgery
reverse shoulder replacement
Journal
JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez:
4
6
2020
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
4
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an increasingly popular treatment modality for glenohumeral joint arthritis in association with rotator cuff arthropathy. A prolonged hospital stay following joint arthroplasty risks increased complications for patients plus financial implications for institutions. We hypothesized that RSA could be safely and effectively carried out as an outpatient procedure with reduced risks to patients and institutional costs. Patients attending our institution for RSA during March 2015 to August 2018 were reviewed preoperatively for consideration for RSA as an outpatient procedure. The inclusion criteria were arthritis of the shoulder having failed conservative management, age older than 50 years, and intact deltoid muscle function. Patients were excluded if they underwent RSA for trauma or for revision following previous total shoulder replacement or hemiarthroplasty. Overall health, social circumstances, and individual wishes were considered. A total of 21 patients underwent RSA as an outpatient procedure. The mean age was 74 years (range, 59-84 years). There were 8 male and 13 female patients. No overnight stays were required in patients in whom outpatient surgery was planned. The Oxford Shoulder Score increased from a mean of 16 (range, 4-30) preoperatively to a mean of 31 (range, 7-35) at 6 months postoperatively; it was a mean of 36 (range, 7-48) at 12 months postoperatively. Of the patients, 88% were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the service and 81% would undergo the surgical procedure again as a day-case procedure. RSA as an outpatient procedure can be carried out effectively with high patient satisfaction rates in carefully selected patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS
OBJECTIVE
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is an increasingly popular treatment modality for glenohumeral joint arthritis in association with rotator cuff arthropathy. A prolonged hospital stay following joint arthroplasty risks increased complications for patients plus financial implications for institutions. We hypothesized that RSA could be safely and effectively carried out as an outpatient procedure with reduced risks to patients and institutional costs.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients attending our institution for RSA during March 2015 to August 2018 were reviewed preoperatively for consideration for RSA as an outpatient procedure. The inclusion criteria were arthritis of the shoulder having failed conservative management, age older than 50 years, and intact deltoid muscle function. Patients were excluded if they underwent RSA for trauma or for revision following previous total shoulder replacement or hemiarthroplasty. Overall health, social circumstances, and individual wishes were considered.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 21 patients underwent RSA as an outpatient procedure. The mean age was 74 years (range, 59-84 years). There were 8 male and 13 female patients. No overnight stays were required in patients in whom outpatient surgery was planned. The Oxford Shoulder Score increased from a mean of 16 (range, 4-30) preoperatively to a mean of 31 (range, 7-35) at 6 months postoperatively; it was a mean of 36 (range, 7-48) at 12 months postoperatively. Of the patients, 88% were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the service and 81% would undergo the surgical procedure again as a day-case procedure.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
RSA as an outpatient procedure can be carried out effectively with high patient satisfaction rates in carefully selected patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32490433
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.01.001
pii: S2666-6383(20)30011-6
pmc: PMC7256897
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
397-399Informations de copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
Références
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Nov;26(11):1889-1896
pubmed: 28911814
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Oct;103(6):847-852
pubmed: 28688963
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 6;98(13):e55
pubmed: 27385689
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):747-53
pubmed: 25704827
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Oct;24(10):1527-33
pubmed: 25865089
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 May;6(3):196-202
pubmed: 29911136
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2432-9
pubmed: 21213090
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):506-511
pubmed: 27751719
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 May;24(5):766-72
pubmed: 25704826
Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1319-22
pubmed: 16243987
Perm J. 2017;21:16-056
pubmed: 28678693
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):204-208
pubmed: 27592373
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):563-72
pubmed: 18264845
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):65-70
pubmed: 30100176
JBJS Rev. 2018 Aug;6(8):e3
pubmed: 30106764
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Sep;25(9):1404-11
pubmed: 27052271
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6S):S65-S69
pubmed: 29426743