Treatment of Chylothorax after Lung Resection: Indications, Timing, and Outcomes.
Aged
Chylothorax
/ diagnostic imaging
Conservative Treatment
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Ligation
Lung Neoplasms
/ pathology
Lymph Node Excision
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Parenteral Nutrition, Total
/ adverse effects
Pneumonectomy
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Thoracic Duct
/ diagnostic imaging
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
Journal
The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon
ISSN: 1439-1902
Titre abrégé: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7903387
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
4
6
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
entrez:
4
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chylothorax following pulmonary resection and lymphadenectomy for cancer is a potential severe complication in thoracic surgery. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of the nonsurgical approach as well as the need for reoperation after conservative approach failure. Chylothorax was diagnosed when chylous leakage from the chest drainage was observed and confirmed by the presence of triglycerides in the pleural fluid. We initially treated all the patients conservatively with complete oral intake cessation and total parenteral nutrition; if drainage output remained more than 800 mL/d after the first 5 days or major pleural effusion was observed at chest X-ray after chest tube removal, surgical treatment of chylothorax was indicated. Between January 1998 and December 2018, 5,072 patients underwent standard anatomical resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection for cancer at our institution. Among them, 30 patients (0.6%) developed chylothorax: 20 patients were effectively treated only by nil per os and low-fat diet, while 10 patients (33.3%) required surgical treatment. Mean age was 63 years; there were 24 male patients (80%); right-sided chylothorax was more frequent than left-sided chylothorax (22 vs. 8, respectively) although not statistically significant ( Conservative treatment is effective in the case of low flow-rate chylothorax (< 800 mL/d); in the case of a higher flow rate, surgical exploration is needed and thoracic duct ligation-with or without lymphatic sites clipping-provides definitive lymphostasis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chylothorax following pulmonary resection and lymphadenectomy for cancer is a potential severe complication in thoracic surgery. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of the nonsurgical approach as well as the need for reoperation after conservative approach failure.
METHODS
Chylothorax was diagnosed when chylous leakage from the chest drainage was observed and confirmed by the presence of triglycerides in the pleural fluid. We initially treated all the patients conservatively with complete oral intake cessation and total parenteral nutrition; if drainage output remained more than 800 mL/d after the first 5 days or major pleural effusion was observed at chest X-ray after chest tube removal, surgical treatment of chylothorax was indicated.
RESULTS
Between January 1998 and December 2018, 5,072 patients underwent standard anatomical resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection for cancer at our institution. Among them, 30 patients (0.6%) developed chylothorax: 20 patients were effectively treated only by nil per os and low-fat diet, while 10 patients (33.3%) required surgical treatment. Mean age was 63 years; there were 24 male patients (80%); right-sided chylothorax was more frequent than left-sided chylothorax (22 vs. 8, respectively) although not statistically significant (
CONCLUSION
Conservative treatment is effective in the case of low flow-rate chylothorax (< 800 mL/d); in the case of a higher flow rate, surgical exploration is needed and thoracic duct ligation-with or without lymphatic sites clipping-provides definitive lymphostasis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32492713
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710071
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
520-524Informations de copyright
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.