Remote Control of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Exploring the New Frontier-First Clinical Application of Real-time Remote-control Management of Cardiac Devices Before and After Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
CIED programming
MRI-safe mode algorithm
remote control
remote monitoring
Journal
The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management
ISSN: 2156-3977
Titre abrégé: J Innov Card Rhythm Manag
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
10
04
2018
accepted:
14
05
2018
entrez:
5
6
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2019
medline:
15
1
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the performance of remote-control (RC) management of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in clinical practice using a new service model in patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The number of CIEDs is constantly growing, alongside the demands for prompt checks. Although remote CIED interrogation exists, ultimately, real-time remote management is the goal. In this study, patients with MRI-conditional devices suitable for RC interaction who required an MRI were enrolled. An onsite technician began the RC session by contacting the remote operator, applying the programmer wand, and keying in an access code. The device was remotely checked via encrypted Wi-Fi by an electrophysiologist using a laptop. An MRI-safe mode was programmed per a preestablished proprietary algorithm. Following the scan, patient devices were remotely reinterrogated and reprogrammed to baseline, with adjustments made as clinically necessary. Patients subsequently were asked to complete a survey. Ultimately, a total of 100 RC CIED reprogrammings were performed in 50 MRI sessions, prescan and postscan. The average RC time interaction was four minutes prescan and three minutes postscan, respectively. No complications occurred. Five patients had more than one MRI in this study and 15 patients had had previous MRIs. In eight patients, baseline settings were reprogrammed. Most patients (82%) were very satisfied, preferring device specialist remote management. Only 14 (32%) patients used home remote monitoring. In conclusion, RC management of CIEDs in the MRI setting is feasible, safe, and clinically relevant. Use of the MRI mode determination algorithm was safe, consistent, and efficient. Expanding RC in CIED management for service anytime, anywhere is the next challenge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32494403
doi: 10.19102/icrm.2019.100102
pii: icrm.2019.100102
pmc: PMC7252860
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3477-3484Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr. Kloosterman receives modest honoraria as a speaker and advisor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott Laboratories. The other authors report no conflicts of interest for the published content. The work reported in this manuscript is part of a physician initiative study that received funding from an educational grant from Medtronic (3504 ERP). The company otherwise had no interaction, opinion, or intervention with regard to the protocol design, study proceedings, or preparation of this manuscript. The study was approved by an investigational review board (human studies/ethics committee).
Références
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S2-S12
pubmed: 17302706
Europace. 2008 Mar;10(3):351-7
pubmed: 18245771
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Oct;23(1):73-85
pubmed: 18821006
Res Nurs Health. 1995 Apr;18(2):179-83
pubmed: 7899572