Evaluating the Need to Address Digital Literacy Among Hospitalized Patients: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 06 2020
Historique:
received: 17 12 2019
accepted: 21 03 2020
revised: 19 03 2020
entrez: 5 6 2020
pubmed: 5 6 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Technology is a potentially powerful tool to assist patients with transitions of care during and after hospitalization. Patients with low health literacy who are predisposed to poor health outcomes are particularly poised to benefit from such interventions. However, this population may lack the ability to effectively engage with technology. Although prior research studied the role of health literacy in technology access/use among outpatients, hospitalized patient populations have not been investigated in this context. Further, with the rapid uptake of technology, access may no longer be pertinent, and differences in technological capabilities may drive the current digital divide. Thus, characterizing the digital literacy of hospitalized patients across health literacy levels is paramount. We sought to determine the relationship between health literacy level and technological access, use, and capability among hospitalized patients. Adult inpatients completed a technology survey that asked about technology access/use and online capabilities as part of an ongoing quality of care study. Participants' health literacy level was assessed utilizing the 3-question Brief Health Literacy Screen. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses (adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level) were performed. Using Bonferroni correction for the 18 tests, the threshold P value for significance was <.003. Among 502 enrolled participants, the mean age was 51 years, 71.3% (358/502) were African American, half (265/502, 52.8%) were female, and half (253/502, 50.4%) had at least some college education. Over one-third (191/502, 38.0%) of participants had low health literacy. The majority of participants owned devices (owned a smartphone: 116/173, 67.1% low health literacy versus 235/300, 78.3% adequate health literacy, P=.007) and had used the Internet previously (143/189, 75.7% low health literacy versus 281/309, 90.9% adequate health literacy, P<.001). Participants with low health literacy were more likely to report needing help performing online tasks (133/189, 70.4% low health literacy versus 135/303, 44.6% adequate health literacy, P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, when adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level, we found that low health literacy was not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of owning smartphones (OR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.4; P=.52) or using the internet ever (OR: 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P=.02). However, low health literacy remained significantly associated with a higher likelihood of needing help performing any online task (OR: 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6; P=.002). The majority of participants with low health literacy had access to technological devices and had used the internet previously, but they were unable to perform online tasks without assistance. The barriers patients face in using online health information and other health information technology may be more related to online capabilities rather than to technology access. When designing and implementing technological tools for hospitalized patients, it is important to ensure that patients across digital literacy levels can both understand and use them.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Technology is a potentially powerful tool to assist patients with transitions of care during and after hospitalization. Patients with low health literacy who are predisposed to poor health outcomes are particularly poised to benefit from such interventions. However, this population may lack the ability to effectively engage with technology. Although prior research studied the role of health literacy in technology access/use among outpatients, hospitalized patient populations have not been investigated in this context. Further, with the rapid uptake of technology, access may no longer be pertinent, and differences in technological capabilities may drive the current digital divide. Thus, characterizing the digital literacy of hospitalized patients across health literacy levels is paramount.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to determine the relationship between health literacy level and technological access, use, and capability among hospitalized patients.
METHODS
Adult inpatients completed a technology survey that asked about technology access/use and online capabilities as part of an ongoing quality of care study. Participants' health literacy level was assessed utilizing the 3-question Brief Health Literacy Screen. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses (adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level) were performed. Using Bonferroni correction for the 18 tests, the threshold P value for significance was <.003.
RESULTS
Among 502 enrolled participants, the mean age was 51 years, 71.3% (358/502) were African American, half (265/502, 52.8%) were female, and half (253/502, 50.4%) had at least some college education. Over one-third (191/502, 38.0%) of participants had low health literacy. The majority of participants owned devices (owned a smartphone: 116/173, 67.1% low health literacy versus 235/300, 78.3% adequate health literacy, P=.007) and had used the Internet previously (143/189, 75.7% low health literacy versus 281/309, 90.9% adequate health literacy, P<.001). Participants with low health literacy were more likely to report needing help performing online tasks (133/189, 70.4% low health literacy versus 135/303, 44.6% adequate health literacy, P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, when adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level, we found that low health literacy was not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of owning smartphones (OR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.4; P=.52) or using the internet ever (OR: 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P=.02). However, low health literacy remained significantly associated with a higher likelihood of needing help performing any online task (OR: 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6; P=.002).
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of participants with low health literacy had access to technological devices and had used the internet previously, but they were unable to perform online tasks without assistance. The barriers patients face in using online health information and other health information technology may be more related to online capabilities rather than to technology access. When designing and implementing technological tools for hospitalized patients, it is important to ensure that patients across digital literacy levels can both understand and use them.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32496196
pii: v22i6e17519
doi: 10.2196/17519
pmc: PMC7303835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e17519

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL118151
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K24 HL136859
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T35 AG029795
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Hanna Vollbrecht, Vineet Arora, Sebastian Otero, Kyle Carey, David Meltzer, Valerie G Press. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.06.2020.

Références

J Health Commun. 2016;21(sup2):135-140
pubmed: 27660917
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:178-182
pubmed: 29295077
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Jun 16;8(2):e9
pubmed: 16867972
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 17;18(5):e91
pubmed: 27154462
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
pubmed: 18335281
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 26;21(3):e11421
pubmed: 30912747
J Health Commun. 2013;18 Suppl 1:197-204
pubmed: 24093356
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 11;21(4):e12779
pubmed: 30973347
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1929-1930
pubmed: 31438412
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3079-87
pubmed: 25363660
J Hosp Med. 2017 Nov;12(11):918-924
pubmed: 29091980
J Hosp Med. 2017 Dec;12(12):969-973
pubmed: 29236095
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Apr 20;7(2):238-47
pubmed: 27437037
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):357-67
pubmed: 23381529
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e47-e54
pubmed: 27402138
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):866-74
pubmed: 12458986
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918205
pubmed: 31899529
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Nov-Dec;19(6):255-65
pubmed: 11192412
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Feb;40(2):68-76
pubmed: 24716329
J Hosp Med. 2007 Sep;2(5):314-23
pubmed: 17935242
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198112
pubmed: 29897921
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jul - Aug;5(4):1032-1039.e1
pubmed: 28065689

Auteurs

Hanna Vollbrecht (H)

Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Vineet Arora (V)

Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Sebastian Otero (S)

Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Kyle Carey (K)

Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

David Meltzer (D)

Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Valerie G Press (VG)

Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH