Patient satisfaction after conversion from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants for patients on extended duration of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism - The SWAN Study.
Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticoagulants
/ administration & dosage
Cohort Studies
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Factor Xa Inhibitors
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Pyrazoles
/ administration & dosage
Pyridones
/ administration & dosage
Retrospective Studies
Rivaroxaban
/ administration & dosage
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Venous Thromboembolism
/ drug therapy
Warfarin
/ therapeutic use
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
12
2019
accepted:
17
05
2020
entrez:
5
6
2020
pubmed:
5
6
2020
medline:
28
8
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Warfarin is an anticoagulant medication proven effective in the initial treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants are alternatives to warfarin; however there is limited data assessing satisfaction after switching from warfarin to an anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant in patients for treatment of venous thromboembolism. To assess medication satisfaction in patients requiring anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after conversion from warfarin to an anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant. A retrospective cohort study with prospective assessment of satisfaction and review of adverse events following anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant replacement of warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Out of 165 patients who had switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban or apixaban from an outpatient haematology practice, 126 patients consented for a survey of patient's relative satisfaction of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant therapy compared with previous warfarin therapy using the Anti-Clot Burden and Benefits Treatment Scale and SWAN Score. The mean Anti-Clot Burden and Benefits and SWAN Score was 93% (56/60) and 83% (24.8/30) respectively reflecting high satisfaction with anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants. 120 patients stated preference for anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants over warfarin. Leading perceptions driving this was the reduction in frequency of medical contact and fewer bleeding side effects. Thirteen patients (10.3%) experienced an adverse event after the anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant switch (majority were non-major bleeding) but most remained on anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant treatment after management options were implemented with continued high satisfaction scores. Patient satisfaction with anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant therapy for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism after switching from warfarin in routine clinical practice appeared high. Improved patient convenience including reduced frequency of medical contact and fewer unpredictable side effects were perceived as significant advantages of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Warfarin is an anticoagulant medication proven effective in the initial treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants are alternatives to warfarin; however there is limited data assessing satisfaction after switching from warfarin to an anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant in patients for treatment of venous thromboembolism.
OBJECTIVES
To assess medication satisfaction in patients requiring anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after conversion from warfarin to an anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study with prospective assessment of satisfaction and review of adverse events following anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant replacement of warfarin for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Out of 165 patients who had switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban or apixaban from an outpatient haematology practice, 126 patients consented for a survey of patient's relative satisfaction of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant therapy compared with previous warfarin therapy using the Anti-Clot Burden and Benefits Treatment Scale and SWAN Score.
RESULTS
The mean Anti-Clot Burden and Benefits and SWAN Score was 93% (56/60) and 83% (24.8/30) respectively reflecting high satisfaction with anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants. 120 patients stated preference for anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants over warfarin. Leading perceptions driving this was the reduction in frequency of medical contact and fewer bleeding side effects. Thirteen patients (10.3%) experienced an adverse event after the anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant switch (majority were non-major bleeding) but most remained on anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant treatment after management options were implemented with continued high satisfaction scores.
CONCLUSIONS
Patient satisfaction with anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulant therapy for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism after switching from warfarin in routine clinical practice appeared high. Improved patient convenience including reduced frequency of medical contact and fewer unpredictable side effects were perceived as significant advantages of anti-Xa direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32497116
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234048
pii: PONE-D-19-35783
pmc: PMC7272044
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anticoagulants
0
Factor Xa Inhibitors
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyridones
0
apixaban
3Z9Y7UWC1J
Warfarin
5Q7ZVV76EI
Rivaroxaban
9NDF7JZ4M3
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0234048Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. There are however several general industrial links and affiliations for authors as indicated below. Mr Scott McGregor industrial links and affiliations: Advisory boards: Gilead Sciences Conference Travel and speaker support: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Pfizer, Abbvie, CSL, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda Equity: Bristol-Myers Squibb Professor Ross Baker industrial links and affiliations: Advisory boards: Roche Industry led Clinical Trial Support payment to Institution: Bayer, Shire, Pfizer, Daiichi, Sankyo, and CSL Behring, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Abbvie, Sanofi, MorphoSys AG, Acerta Pharma, Jansen-Cileg Conference Travel and speaker support: Shire, Roche, CSL Behring, Bayer, BMS, Novo Nordisk Research support from: Shire, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Portola, Technoclone This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.'
Références
Med J Aust. 2018 Jan 15;208(1):18-23
pubmed: 29320668
Thromb Res. 2015 Feb;135(2):281-8
pubmed: 25483215
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):498-506
pubmed: 23796283
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Oct;3(10):e480-e488
pubmed: 27692306
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Oct;39(10):565-569
pubmed: 27362695
Med J Aust. 2016 Feb 15;204(3):104-5.e1
pubmed: 26866544
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 30;376(13):1211-1222
pubmed: 28316279
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e44S-e88S
pubmed: 22315269
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):799-808
pubmed: 23808982
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Sep 25;11:1625-1634
pubmed: 29026288
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Sep 26;10:120
pubmed: 23013426
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2015 Feb;27(1):99-102
pubmed: 24880697
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2499-510
pubmed: 21128814
Thromb Res. 2012 Apr;129 Suppl 1:S106-13
pubmed: 22682119
N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):699-708
pubmed: 23216615
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;110(4):732-41
pubmed: 23846019
Can J Cardiol. 2018 Nov;34(11):1412-1425
pubmed: 30404747
Cardiol Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):171-186
pubmed: 27457613
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2015 Mar;13(1):45-54
pubmed: 25786423
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):61
pubmed: 26081245
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 5;366(14):1287-97
pubmed: 22449293