Biologic therapy in severe and refractory peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK). Multicenter study of 34 patients.
Adalimumab
Anti-TNF therapy
Belimumab
Biologic therapy in PUK
Certolizumab
Etanercept
Golimumab
Infliximab
Rituximab
Tocilizumab
Journal
Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism
ISSN: 1532-866X
Titre abrégé: Semin Arthritis Rheum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1306053
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
12
02
2020
revised:
26
03
2020
accepted:
30
03
2020
pubmed:
5
6
2020
medline:
14
7
2021
entrez:
5
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We assessed the efficacy and safety of biologic therapy in severe and refractory Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK). Open-label multicenter study of biologic-treated patients with severe PUK refractory to conventional immunosuppressive drugs. We studied 34 patients (44 affected eyes) (24 women/10 men; mean age, 55.26±17.4 years). PUK was associated with a well-defined condition in 29 of them (rheumatoid arthritis [n = 20], psoriatic arthritis [n = 2], inflammatory bowel disease [n = 2], Behçet disease [n = 1], granulomatosis with polyangiitis [n = 1], microscopic polyangiitis [n = 1], systemic lupus erythematosus [n = 1] and axial spondyloarthritis [n = 1]). Besides topical and oral systemic glucocorticoids, patients had received: methylprednisolone pulses [n = 9], and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, mainly methotrexate [n = 18], and leflunomide [n = 7]. Eleven patients had required ocular surgery prior to biologic therapy. Following biologic therapy, baseline main outcomes were compared with those found at 1st week, 1st and 6th months and 1st year. Efficacy and safety of biologic therapy. Efficacy was analyzed by the assessment of corneal inflammation (corneal thinning, central keratolysis and ocular perforation); other causes of ocular surface inflammation (scleritis, episcleritis); intraocular inflammation (uveitis); visual acuity and glucocorticoid sparing effect. The first biologic agents used were anti-TNFα drugs (n = 25); adalimumab (n = 16), infliximab (n = 8), etanercept (n = 1), and non-TNFα agents (n = 9); rituximab (n = 7), tocilizumab (n = 1) belimumab (n = 1) and abatacept (n = 1). During the follow-up, switching to a second biologic agent was required in 12 of the 25 (48%) patients treated with anti-TNFα drugs. However, no switching was required in those undergoing biologic therapy different from anti-TNFα agents. The main outcome variables showed a rapid and maintained improvement after a mean follow-up of 23.7 ± 20 months. Major adverse effects were tachyphylaxis, relapsing respiratory infections, supraventricular tachycardia, pulmonary tuberculosis and death, one each. Biologic therapy is effective and relatively safe in patients with severe and refractory PUK. Non-anti-TNFα agents appear to be effective in these patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32497929
pii: S0049-0172(20)30094-9
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.03.023
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Factors
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
608-615Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations of Competing Interest Disclosures that might be interpreted as constituting of possible conflict(s) of interest for the study: Professor MA Gonzalez-Gay received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi and Celgene. Dr. R Blanco received grants/research supports from Abbvie, MSD and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in company sponsored speaker´s bureau from Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD.