Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect.
Hemispatial neglect
Non-invasive brain stimulation
Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) trial
Stroke
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Journal
Neuropsychological rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-0694
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychol Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9112672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
6
6
2020
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
6
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Up to 80% of people who experience a right-hemisphere stroke suffer from hemispatial neglect. This syndrome is debilitating and impedes rehabilitation. We carried out a clinical feasibility trial of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and a behavioural rehabilitation programme, alone or in combination, in patients with neglect. Patients >4 weeks post right hemisphere stroke were randomized to 10 sessions of tDCS, 10 sessions of a behavioural intervention, combined intervention, or a control task. Primary outcomes were recruitment and retention rates, with secondary outcomes effect sizes on measures of neglect and quality of life, assessed directly after the interventions, and at 6 months follow up. Of 288 confirmed stroke cases referred (representing 7% of confirmed strokes), we randomized 8% (0.6% of stroke cases overall). The largest number of exclusions (91/288 (34%)) were due to medical comorbidities that prevented patients from undergoing 10 intervention sessions. We recruited 24 patients over 29 months, with 87% completing immediate post-intervention and 67% 6 month evaluations. We established poor feasibility of a clinical trial requiring repeated hospital-based tDCS within a UK hospital healthcare setting, either with or without behavioural training, over a sustained time period. Future trials should consider intensity, duration and location of tDCS neglect interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32498606
doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1767161
pmc: PMC8372288
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02401724']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1163-1189Subventions
Organisme : Chief Scientist Office
ID : ETM/353
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/N003403/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Neuroscientist. 2017 Apr;23(2):109-123
pubmed: 26873962
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Sep 29;8:180
pubmed: 25324736
Neuroimage. 2012 Jul 16;61(4):957-65
pubmed: 22440645
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Jun;55(6):431-6
pubmed: 1619406
Neuroreport. 1995 Dec 29;7(1):246-8
pubmed: 8742462
Brain. 2008 Dec;131(Pt 12):3147-55
pubmed: 18948300
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):355-366.e1
pubmed: 28802812
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2015;33(5):647-62
pubmed: 25855132
Behav Neurol. 2010;23(4):237-9
pubmed: 21422564
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Feb;41(3):162-5
pubmed: 19229449
Neuropsychology. 1997 Jan;11(1):53-8
pubmed: 9055269
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 01;(7):CD003586
pubmed: 23813503
Front Neurosci. 2017 Dec 01;11:664
pubmed: 29249932
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):886-93
pubmed: 12667525
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2616-24
pubmed: 19282456
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):379-84
pubmed: 10206598
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1603-10
pubmed: 16234807
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Dec 26;448(2):171-4
pubmed: 18952147
Cortex. 2013 Sep;49(8):2021-7
pubmed: 23332473
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;54(4):345-50
pubmed: 2056321
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 21;3:CD009645
pubmed: 26996760
Neurology. 1980 May;30(5):509-17
pubmed: 7189256
Neurology. 2005 Mar 8;64(5):821-7
pubmed: 15753416
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:152-61
pubmed: 25940097
Cortex. 2015 Aug;69:152-65
pubmed: 26073146
Neuron. 2007 Mar 15;53(6):905-18
pubmed: 17359924
Brain. 2009 Nov;132(Pt 11):3011-20
pubmed: 19528092
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Oct 25;554:94-8
pubmed: 24021804
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Sep;27(9):2759-61
pubmed: 26504287
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Sep;23(7):641-56
pubmed: 19531606
Elife. 2017 Sep 12;6:
pubmed: 28893377
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):883-94
pubmed: 25730165
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Dec;30(12):1229-1241
pubmed: 26721872
Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6
pubmed: 19064743
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar - Apr;11(2):459-461
pubmed: 29221910
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Feb;45(2):702-7
pubmed: 14744917
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(2):251-272
pubmed: 28116988
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;40(2):223-9
pubmed: 27152271
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(4):515-526
pubmed: 27380545
J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9
pubmed: 10990547
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Dec;31(12):1017-1028
pubmed: 29192535
Stroke. 1997 Jul;28(7):1386-91
pubmed: 9227688
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:139-151
pubmed: 28343987
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Oct;50(8):3261-3268
pubmed: 30888090
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40
pubmed: 10512918
Nature. 1998 Sep 10;395(6698):166-9
pubmed: 9744273
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:222-5
pubmed: 26736240
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Oct;50(8):3380-3388
pubmed: 31228880
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Mar 16;8(330):330re1
pubmed: 27089207