Disability-inclusive COVID-19 response: What it is, why it is important and what we can learn from the United Kingdom's response.

COVID-19 Disability

Journal

Wellcome open research
ISSN: 2398-502X
Titre abrégé: Wellcome Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101696457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
accepted: 21 04 2020
entrez: 6 6 2020
pubmed: 6 6 2020
medline: 6 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

All too often, disabled people are left behind in emergencies, and this is a risk in the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. This is an important issue, as globally there are approximately one billion people with disabilities. This number includes one in three people aged over 60, who are the group at greatest risk from COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic in the UK has highlighted additional difficulties that disabled people may face. Complying with preventative measures, like social distancing, can be challenging, particular for people who rely on carers. Disabled people may also be at greater risk of morbidity and mortality if they contract the virus, yet in danger of being de-prioritised for care. Many people with disabilities have ongoing healthcare needs, and these need to still be supported during the pandemic. Furthermore, people may become newly disabled as a result of the pandemic, and therefore require appropriate care. Good practice examples have emerged for meeting these challenges, such as guidance for healthcare professionals on treating people with dementia, but these need to be scaled up further and adapted for other settings. In conclusion, it is clear that a disability-inclusive COVID-19 response is needed, both in the UK and as the pandemic unfolds globally. This response will require inclusion of disability measures within data collection, consulting with disabled people, and tailoring responses to be appropriate for this group.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32500099
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15833.1
pmc: PMC7236579
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

79

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Kuper H et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

No competing interests were disclosed.

Références

Soc Sci Med. 2017 Oct;191:143-150
pubmed: 28923519
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e17-e18
pubmed: 32085841
Emerg Infect Dis. 2006 Dec;12(12):1924-32
pubmed: 17326946
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e21
pubmed: 32171062
BMC Neurol. 2011 Mar 24;11:37
pubmed: 21435231

Auteurs

Hannah Kuper (H)

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Lena Morgon Banks (LM)

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Tess Bright (T)

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Calum Davey (C)

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Tom Shakespeare (T)

International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Classifications MeSH