Measurement of Mandibular Condylar Height Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez:
7
6
2020
pubmed:
7
6
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to find out the most appropriate method of measuring condylar height on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Traditional three-circle method, modified three-circle method and ramal plane (RP) method were used by 2 separate observers for the measurement of condylar height and long axis of condyle on TMJ MRI. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCCs), intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), paired t test and Bland-Altman analysis were applied for the comparison of CH and long axis of condyle between 2 observers. Thirty-two patients' images were finally included in our study. Comparing the 3 methods, it was revealed that the RP method has the highest consistency among the observers, followed by the modified three-circle method, and the traditional three-circle method has the worst consistency. The RP method is preferred for measuring the condylar height on MRI. If mandible edge cannot be observed on MRI, the modified three-circle method is recommended.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32503097
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006422
pii: 00001665-202006000-00109
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e415-e418Références
Vogl TJ, Abolmaali N. MRI of the temporomandibular joint. Technique, results, indications. Rofo 2001; 173:969–979.
Suenaga S, Sonoda S, Oku T, et al. MRI of the temporomandibular joint disk and posterior disk attachment before and after nonsurgical treatment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21:892–896.
Helenius LM, Tervahartiala P, Helenius I, et al. Clinical, radiographic and MRI findings of the temporomandibular joint in patients with different rheumatic diseases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 11:983–989.
Larheim TA. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs 2005; 1:6–21.
Styles C, Whyte A. MRI in the assessment of internal derangement and pain within the temporomandibular joint: a pictorial essay. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 3:220–228.
Felemban D, Verdonschot RG, Iwamoto Y, et al. A quantitative experimental phantom study on MRI image uniformity. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018; 6:20180077.
Ye YG, Lee SH, Yoon HJ. The relative signal intensity of retrodiscal tissue in TMJ using a T2-weighted MRI. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; Suppl 1:120–121.
Goran M, Lukas M, Raphael P, et al. Assessing the length of the mandibular ramus and the condylar process: a comparison of OPG, CBCT, CT, MRI, and lateral cephalometric measurements. Eur J Orthod 2015; 1:13–21.
Fang B, Shen GF, Yang C, et al. Changes in condylar and joint disc positions after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 7:726–730.
Nebbe B, Major PW, Prasad NGN, et al. Quantitative assessment of temporomandibular joint disk status. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodont 1998; 5:598–607.
Qianyang X, Chi Y, Dongmei H, et al. Is mandibular asymmetry more frequent and severe with unilateral disc displacement? J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015; 1:81–86.
Iguchi R, Yoshizawa K, Moroi A, et al. Comparison of temporomandibular joint and ramus morphology between class II and class III cases before and after bi-maxillary osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017; 12:2002–2009.
Mevlut C, Koray H, Buyuk SK, et al. Condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2013; 5:691–697.
Orhan K, Avsever H, Aksoy S, et al. Temporomandibular joint MR images: Incidental head and neck findings and pathologies. Cranio J Craniomand Pract 2019; 2:121–128.
Summer JD, Westesson PL. Mandibular repositioning can be effective in treatment of reducing TMJ disk displacement. A long-term clinical and MR imaging follow-up. J Craniomand Pract 1997; 2:107–120.
Herzog S, Mafee M. Synovial chondromatosis of the TMJ: MR and CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1990; 4:742–745.
Sassouni V. A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facio-dental relationships. Am J Orthod 1955; 10:735–764.