Test-retest reliability of the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview for mental disorders.
CIDI
Clinical interview
DIA-X
DSM-5
Retest reliability
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 06 2020
05 06 2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2019
accepted:
04
05
2020
entrez:
7
6
2020
pubmed:
7
6
2020
medline:
16
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is a need of comprehensive standardized diagnostic assessment tools of psychopathology that match recent changes in diagnostic classification systems, such as the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Therefore, the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 was developed and its test-retest reliability was explored. The DIA-X-5 is based on the DIA-X/M-CIDI (Diagnostisches Expertensystem für psychische Störungen/Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview) which referred to the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). A convenience sample (N = 60, age: 15-67) was interviewed twice with the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview, on average nine days apart, by trained and blinded interviewers. The DIA-X-5 is a standardized instrument for research purposes covering symptoms, syndromes and diagnoses from eleven classes of mental disorders according to the DSM-5 with matching F codes of the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Kappa values ranged from 0.90 for post-traumatic stress disorder to 0.30 for social anxiety disorder. For age of onset and age of recency, test-retest reliability as measured by intra-class correlation was satisfying with values above 0.90 for most disorders. Test-retest reliability of the DIA-X-5 syndromes and diagnoses were comparable to those of previous DSM-IV/DIA-X diagnoses for most disorders. Due to low case numbers for some diagnoses, further research in larger samples is required.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a need of comprehensive standardized diagnostic assessment tools of psychopathology that match recent changes in diagnostic classification systems, such as the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). Therefore, the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 was developed and its test-retest reliability was explored. The DIA-X-5 is based on the DIA-X/M-CIDI (Diagnostisches Expertensystem für psychische Störungen/Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview) which referred to the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).
METHODS
A convenience sample (N = 60, age: 15-67) was interviewed twice with the computer-assisted DIA-X-5 interview, on average nine days apart, by trained and blinded interviewers. The DIA-X-5 is a standardized instrument for research purposes covering symptoms, syndromes and diagnoses from eleven classes of mental disorders according to the DSM-5 with matching F codes of the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10).
RESULTS
Kappa values ranged from 0.90 for post-traumatic stress disorder to 0.30 for social anxiety disorder. For age of onset and age of recency, test-retest reliability as measured by intra-class correlation was satisfying with values above 0.90 for most disorders.
CONCLUSIONS
Test-retest reliability of the DIA-X-5 syndromes and diagnoses were comparable to those of previous DSM-IV/DIA-X diagnoses for most disorders. Due to low case numbers for some diagnoses, further research in larger samples is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32503463
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02653-6
pmc: PMC7275419
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
280Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Psychiatr Res. 1994 Jan-Feb;28(1):57-84
pubmed: 8064641
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):193
pubmed: 29898698
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2002;11(1):1-18
pubmed: 12459800
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):93-121
pubmed: 15297906
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2018 Mar;27(1):
pubmed: 29034525
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jun;22(2):83-99
pubmed: 23788523
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;44(2):172-7
pubmed: 3813814
Br J Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;210(2):125-131
pubmed: 27609811
J Psychiatr Res. 1995 Mar-Apr;29(2):95-110
pubmed: 7666382
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9
pubmed: 8501467
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;33(11):568-78
pubmed: 9803825
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1991 Mar;13(2):328-38
pubmed: 1864918
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;50(6):851-66
pubmed: 25982479