Constructing stability - a classic grounded theory of next-of-kin in palliative cancer care.
Cancer
Constructing stability
Grounded theory
Next-of-kin
Palliative care
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
06
11
2019
accepted:
19
05
2020
entrez:
7
6
2020
pubmed:
7
6
2020
medline:
14
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Being next-of-kin to someone with cancer requiring palliative care involves a complex life situation. Changes in roles and relationships might occur and the next-of-kin thereby try to adapt by being involved in the ill person's experiences and care even though they can feel unprepared for the care they are expected to provide. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a classic grounded theory of next-of-kin in palliative cancer care. Forty-two next-of-kin to persons with cancer in palliative phase or persons who had died from cancer were interviewed. Theoretical sampling was used during data collection. The data was analysed using classic Grounded Theory methodology to conceptualize patterns of human behaviour. Constructing stability emerged as the pattern of behaviour through which next-of-kin deal with their main concern; struggling with helplessness. This helplessness includes an involuntary waiting for the inevitable. The waiting causes sadness and frustration, which in turn increases the helplessness. The theory involves; Shielding, Acknowledging the reality, Going all in, Putting up boundaries, Asking for help, and Planning for the inescapable. These strategies can be used separately or simultaneously and they can also overlap each other. There are several conditions that may impact the theory Constructing stability, which strategies are used, and what the outcomes might be. Some conditions that emerged in this theory are time, personal finances, attitudes from extended family and friends and availability of healthcare resources. The theory shows the complexities of being next-of-kin to someone receiving palliative care, while striving to construct stability. This theory can increase healthcare professionals' awareness of how next-of-kin struggle with helplessness and thus generates insight into how to support them in this struggle.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Being next-of-kin to someone with cancer requiring palliative care involves a complex life situation. Changes in roles and relationships might occur and the next-of-kin thereby try to adapt by being involved in the ill person's experiences and care even though they can feel unprepared for the care they are expected to provide. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a classic grounded theory of next-of-kin in palliative cancer care.
METHOD
METHODS
Forty-two next-of-kin to persons with cancer in palliative phase or persons who had died from cancer were interviewed. Theoretical sampling was used during data collection. The data was analysed using classic Grounded Theory methodology to conceptualize patterns of human behaviour.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Constructing stability emerged as the pattern of behaviour through which next-of-kin deal with their main concern; struggling with helplessness. This helplessness includes an involuntary waiting for the inevitable. The waiting causes sadness and frustration, which in turn increases the helplessness. The theory involves; Shielding, Acknowledging the reality, Going all in, Putting up boundaries, Asking for help, and Planning for the inescapable. These strategies can be used separately or simultaneously and they can also overlap each other. There are several conditions that may impact the theory Constructing stability, which strategies are used, and what the outcomes might be. Some conditions that emerged in this theory are time, personal finances, attitudes from extended family and friends and availability of healthcare resources.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The theory shows the complexities of being next-of-kin to someone receiving palliative care, while striving to construct stability. This theory can increase healthcare professionals' awareness of how next-of-kin struggle with helplessness and thus generates insight into how to support them in this struggle.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32503506
doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00580-7
pii: 10.1186/s12904-020-00580-7
pmc: PMC7345519
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Foundation Region Kronoberg Sweden
ID : 2017
Références
Fam Process. 2013 Dec;52(4):709-22
pubmed: 24329412
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1187-1195
pubmed: 30209602
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2016 Oct 1;26(4):312-317
pubmed: 31148670
Support Care Cancer. 2001 Nov;9(8):642-5
pubmed: 11762976
BMC Nurs. 2011 Jan 27;10:2
pubmed: 21272349
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60
pubmed: 24618967
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Mar;26(3):759-766
pubmed: 28952034
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4131-40
pubmed: 27137213
Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;29(6):496-507
pubmed: 25634637
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1158-69
pubmed: 16911057
Qual Health Res. 2012 Sep;22(9):1220-31
pubmed: 22745365
Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;32(6):1078-1090
pubmed: 29457743
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Apr 17;13:22
pubmed: 24742046
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Apr;25(4):1229-1236
pubmed: 27924357
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2014 Oct;20(10):494-501
pubmed: 25350215
J Pediatr Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):660-9
pubmed: 25038375
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep;44(3):410-20
pubmed: 22727950
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep;25(5):744-52
pubmed: 27028409
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Aug;30(5):488-96
pubmed: 25425737
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jul;24(7):3057-67
pubmed: 26887588
Urol Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;37(1):37-44
pubmed: 29240364
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2527-35
pubmed: 23625020