Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks.
Journal
Cognitive research: principles and implications
ISSN: 2365-7464
Titre abrégé: Cogn Res Princ Implic
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 06 2020
05 06 2020
Historique:
received:
13
11
2019
accepted:
06
05
2020
entrez:
7
6
2020
pubmed:
7
6
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Effort as a concept, whether momentary, sustained, or as a function of different task conditions, is of critical importance to resource theories of attention, fatigue/boredom, workplace motivation, career selection, performance, job incentives, and other applied psychology concerns. Various models of motivation suggest that there is an inverted-U-shaped function describing the personal utility of effort, but there are expected to be individual differences in the optimal levels of effort that also are related to specific domain preferences. The current study assessed the disutility of effort for 125 different tasks/activities and also explored individual differences correlates of task preferences, in a sample of 77 undergraduate participants. The participants rated each activity in terms of the amount of compensation they would require to perform the task for a period of 4 h. They also completed paired comparisons for a subset of 24 items, followed by a set of preference judgments. Multidimensional scaling and preference scaling techniques were used to determine individual differences in task preference. Personality, motivation, and interest traits were shown to be substantially related to task preferences. Implications for understanding which individuals are oriented toward or away from tasks with different effort demands are discussed, along with considerations for the dynamics of attentional effort allocations during task performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32504129
doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5
pii: 10.1186/s41235-020-00226-5
pmc: PMC7275105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
26Références
Psychol Bull. 1997 Mar;121(2):219-45
pubmed: 9100487
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:192-6
pubmed: 24140077
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79
pubmed: 24304775
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Nov;139(4):665-82
pubmed: 20853993
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Jun;13(2):57-78
pubmed: 17535132
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210
pubmed: 23894295
Psychol Rev. 1959 Jan;66(1):27-44
pubmed: 13645849
Multivariate Behav Res. 1981 Apr 1;16(2):149-70
pubmed: 26825420
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jun;15(2):395-415
pubmed: 25673005
Mem Cognit. 1989 May;17(3):337-48
pubmed: 2657319
Psychol Bull. 2013 Jul;139(4):841-69
pubmed: 23231531
J Psychol. 2003 Nov;137(6):569-95
pubmed: 14992349