Pilot performance of a dedicated prostate PET suitable for diagnosis and biopsy guidance.
Journal
EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jun 2020
05 Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
04
02
2020
accepted:
14
05
2020
entrez:
7
6
2020
pubmed:
7
6
2020
medline:
7
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Prostate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most common types of cancers facing the male population. Nowadays, to confirm PCa, systematic or multiparametric MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsies of the prostate are required. However, due to the lack of an accurate imaging technique capable to precisely locate cancerous cells in the prostate, ultrasound biopsies sample random parts of the prostate and, therefore, it is possible to miss regions where those cancerous cells are present. In spite of the improvement with multiparametric MRI, the low reproducibility of its reading undermines the specificity of the method. Recent development of prostate-specific radiotracers has grown the interest on using positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for this purpose, but technological improvements are still required (current scanners have resolutions in the range of 4-5 mm). The main goal of this work is to improve state-of-the-art PCa imaging and diagnosis. We have focused our efforts on the design of a novel prostate-dedicated PET scanner, named ProsPET. This system has small scanner dimensions defined by a ring of just 41 cm inner diameter. In this work, we report the design, implementation, and evaluation (both through simulations and real data) of the ProsPET scanner. We have been able to achieve < 2 mm resolution in reconstructed images and high sensitivity. In addition, we have included a comparison with the Philips Gemini-TF scanner, which is used for routine imaging of PCa patients. The ProsPET exhibits better contrast, especially for rod sizes as small as 4.5 mm in diameter. Finally, we also show the first reconstructed image of a PCa patient acquired with the ProsPET. We have designed and built a prostate specific PET system, with a small footprint and improved spatial resolution when compared to conventional whole-body PET scanners. The gamma ray impact within each detector block includes accurate DOI determination, correcting for the parallax error. The potential role of combined organ-dedicated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and ultrasound devices, as a prebiopsy diagnostic tool, could be used to guide sampling of the most aggressive sites in the prostate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Prostate cancer (PCa) represents one of the most common types of cancers facing the male population. Nowadays, to confirm PCa, systematic or multiparametric MRI-targeted transrectal or transperineal biopsies of the prostate are required. However, due to the lack of an accurate imaging technique capable to precisely locate cancerous cells in the prostate, ultrasound biopsies sample random parts of the prostate and, therefore, it is possible to miss regions where those cancerous cells are present. In spite of the improvement with multiparametric MRI, the low reproducibility of its reading undermines the specificity of the method. Recent development of prostate-specific radiotracers has grown the interest on using positron emission tomography (PET) scanners for this purpose, but technological improvements are still required (current scanners have resolutions in the range of 4-5 mm).
RESULTS
RESULTS
The main goal of this work is to improve state-of-the-art PCa imaging and diagnosis. We have focused our efforts on the design of a novel prostate-dedicated PET scanner, named ProsPET. This system has small scanner dimensions defined by a ring of just 41 cm inner diameter. In this work, we report the design, implementation, and evaluation (both through simulations and real data) of the ProsPET scanner. We have been able to achieve < 2 mm resolution in reconstructed images and high sensitivity. In addition, we have included a comparison with the Philips Gemini-TF scanner, which is used for routine imaging of PCa patients. The ProsPET exhibits better contrast, especially for rod sizes as small as 4.5 mm in diameter. Finally, we also show the first reconstructed image of a PCa patient acquired with the ProsPET.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We have designed and built a prostate specific PET system, with a small footprint and improved spatial resolution when compared to conventional whole-body PET scanners. The gamma ray impact within each detector block includes accurate DOI determination, correcting for the parallax error. The potential role of combined organ-dedicated prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET and ultrasound devices, as a prebiopsy diagnostic tool, could be used to guide sampling of the most aggressive sites in the prostate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32504230
doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00305-y
pii: 10.1186/s40658-020-00305-y
pmc: PMC7275110
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
38Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 695536
Pays : International
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
ID : TEC2016-79884-C2-1-R
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
ID : DTS15/00152
Références
World J Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):63-89
pubmed: 31068988
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86
pubmed: 25220842
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Oct 7;49(19):4543-61
pubmed: 15552416
J Nucl Med. 2004 May;45(5):822-6
pubmed: 15136632
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Sep 10;63(18):185005
pubmed: 30113313
J Urol. 1997 Mar;157(3):902-6
pubmed: 9072596
Urol Oncol. 2013 Feb;31(2):144-54
pubmed: 22658884
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Dec 21;55(24):7399-410
pubmed: 21098923
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):942-8
pubmed: 22462566
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2018 Sep 21;73(suppl 1):e586s
pubmed: 30281701
J Nucl Med. 2017 Dec;58(12):1943-1948
pubmed: 28619734
Int J Oncol. 2011 Jan;38(1):33-9
pubmed: 21109923
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4:CD012663
pubmed: 31022301
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):941-949
pubmed: 28138747
J Nucl Med. 2007 Mar;48(3):471-80
pubmed: 17332626
J Nucl Med. 2010 Nov;51(11):1813-20
pubmed: 21051652