Comparison of predicted and real propofol and remifentanil concentrations in plasma and brain tissue during target-controlled infusion: a prospective observational study.


Journal

Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
accepted: 02 05 2020
pubmed: 9 6 2020
medline: 25 11 2020
entrez: 8 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Target-controlled infusion systems are increasingly used to administer intravenous anaesthetic drugs to achieve a user-specified plasma or effect-site target concentration. While several studies have investigated the ability of the underlying pharmacokinetic-dynamic models to predict plasma concentrations, there are no data on their performance in predicting drug concentrations in the human brain. We assessed the predictive performance of the Marsh propofol model and Minto remifentanil model for plasma and brain tissue concentrations. Plasma samples were obtained during neurosurgery from 38 patients, and brain tissue samples from nine patients. Propofol and remifentanil concentrations were measured using gas chromatography mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Data were analysed from the nine patients in whom both plasma and brain samples were simultaneously obtained. For the Minto model (five patients), the median performance error was 72% for plasma and -14% for brain tissue concentration predictions. The model tended to underestimate plasma remifentanil concentrations, and to overestimate brain tissue remifentanil concentrations. For the Marsh model (five patients), the median prediction errors for plasma and brain tissue concentrations were 12% and 81%, respectively. However, when the data from all blood propofol assays (36 patients) were analysed, the median prediction error was 11%, with overprediction in 15 (42%) patients and underprediction in 21 (58%). These findings confirm earlier reports demonstrating inaccuracy for commonly used pharmacokinetic-dynamic models for plasma concentrations and extend these findings to the prediction of effect-site concentrations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32506561
doi: 10.1111/anae.15125
doi:

Substances chimiques

Remifentanil P10582JYYK
Propofol YI7VU623SF

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1626-1634

Subventions

Organisme : Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
ID : 1S87720N
Pays : International
Organisme : Clinical Research and Education Council (KOOR) of UZ Leuven
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Association of Anaesthetists.

Références

Absalom AR, Glen JIB, Zwart GJC, Schnider TW, Struys MMRF. Target-controlled infusion: a mature technology. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2016; 122: 70-8.
Struys MMRF, De Smet T, Glen JIB, Vereecke HEM, Absalom AR, Schnider TW. The history of target-controlled infusion. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2016; 122: 56-69.
Marsh B, White M, Morton N, Kenny GNC. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991; 67: 41-8.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Gambus PL, et al. The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 1170-82.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1502-16.
Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 24-33.
Nimmo AF, Absalom AR, Bagshaw O, et al. Guidelines for the safe practice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA). Anaesthesia 2019; 74: 211-24.
Eleveld DJ, Colin P, Absalom AR, Struys MMRF. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for propofol for broad application in anaesthesia and sedation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2018; 120: 942-59.
Eleveld DJ, Proost JH, Vereecke H, et al. An allometric model of remifentanil pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 1005-18.
Wakeling HG, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, Glass PS. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol : what predicts loss of consciousness? Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 92-7.
Kazama T, Ikeda K, Morita K, et al. Comparison of the effect-site keos of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 1517-27.
Shortal BP, Reitz SL, Aggarwal A, et al. Development and validation of brain target controlled infusion of propofol in mice. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0194949.
Sahinovic MM, Eleveld DJ, Miyabe-Nishiwaki T, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol: changes in patients with frontal brain tumours. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 118: 901-9.
Weaver BMQ, Staddon GE, Raptopoulos D,Mapleso WW. Partitioning of propofol between blood cells, plasma and deproteinised plasma in sheep. Proceedings of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists 1998; 25: 19-23.
Kabbaj M, Vachon P, Varin F. Impact of peripheral elimination on the concentration-effect relationship of remifentanil in anaesthetized dogs. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 94: 357-65.
Dutta S, Matsumoto Y, Muramatsu A, Matsumoto M, Fukuoka M, Ebling WF. Steady-state propofol brain:plasma and brain:blood partition coefficients and the effect-site equilibration paradox. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 81: 422-4.
Dawidowicz AL, Kalitynski R, Nestorowicz A, Fijalkowska A. Changes of propofol concentration in cerebrospinal fluid during continuous infusion. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 95: 1282-4.
Dawidowicz AL, Kalitynski R, Fijalkowska A. Free and bound propofol concentrations in human cerebrospinal fluid. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2003; 56: 545-50.
Høymork SC, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, Steen PA. Bispectral index, predicted and measured drug levels of target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and emergence. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2000; 44: 1138-44.
Wu J, Zhu SM, He HL, Weng XC, Huang SQ, Chen YZ. Plasma propofol concentrations during orthotopic liver transplantation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2005; 49: 804-10.
van den Berg JP, Vereecke HEM, Proost JH, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 118: 44-57.
Cortegiani A, Pavan A, Azzeri F, Accurso G, Vitale F, Gregoretti C. Precision and Bias of Target-Controlled Prolonged Propofol Infusion for General Anesthesia and Sedation in Neurosurgical Patients. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2018; 58: 606-12.
La Colla L, Albertin A, La Colla G, et al. No adjustment vs. adjustment formula as input weight for propofol target-controlled infusion in morbidly obese patients. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2009; 26: 362-9.
Wietasch JKG, Scholz M, Zinserling J, et al. The performance of a target-controlled infusion of propofol in combination with remifentanil: a clinical investigation with two propofol formulations. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006; 102: 430-7.
Hara M, Masui K, Eleveld DJ, Struys MMRF, Uchida O. Predictive performance of eleven pharmacokinetic models for propofol infusion in children for long-duration anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 118: 415-23.
Yi J-M, Doh I, Lee S-H, et al. Predictive performance of a new pharmacokinetic model for propofol in underweight patients during target-controlled infusion. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2019; 63: 448-54.
Lee YH, Choi GH, Jung KW, et al. Predictive performance of the modified Marsh and Schnider models for propofol in underweight patients undergoing general anaesthesia using target-controlled infusion. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2017; 118: 883-91.
Mertens MJ, Engbers FHM, Burm AGL, Vuyk J. Predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion of remifentanil during propofol/remifentanil anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2003; 90: 132-41.
Chism JP, Rickert DE. The pharmacokinetics and extra-hepatic clearance of remifentanil, a short acting opioid agonist, in male beagle dogs during constant rate infusions. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 1996; 24: 34 LP-40.

Auteurs

L Van Hese (L)

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging (M4I) institute, Division of Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

T Theys (T)

Neurosurgery Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Laboratory for Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

A R Absalom (AR)

Neurosurgery Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Laboratory for Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

S Rex (S)

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

E Cuypers (E)

Toxicology and Pharmacology Department, KU Leuven, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Maastricht MultiModal Molecular Imaging (M4I) institute, Division of Imaging Mass Spectrometry, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH