Utility of angiography-physiology coregistration maps during percutaneous coronary intervention in clinical practice.
Coregistration
Instantaneous wave-free ratio
Physiological map
Pullback tracing
Journal
Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics
ISSN: 1868-4297
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Interv Ther
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101522043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
16
04
2020
pubmed:
9
6
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
9
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to evaluate the utility and feasibility of physiological maps coregistered with angiograms using the pullback of a pressure guidewire with continuous instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurements. iFR pullback was obtained for 70 lesions from 70 patients with stable angina pectoris using SyncVision (Philips Corp.). Physiological maps were created, whereby the post-intervention iFR (post-iFR) was predicted as iFRpred. The iFR gap was defined if the difference between the iFRpred and post-iFR was ≥ 0.3. The lesion morphology changed from that during the physiological assessment to that during the angiographic assessment in 26 lesions (37.1%). In particular, 22.6% of angiographic tandem lesions changed to physiological focal lesions. The mean pre-intervention iFR, post-iFR, and iFRpred were 0.73 ± 0.17, 0.90 ± 0.06, and 0.93 ± 0.05, respectively. The mean difference between the iFRpred and post-iFR was 0.029 ± 0.099, with 95% limits of agreement of -0.070-0.128. iFR gaps occurred in 28 patients (40%). Notably, a new iFR gradient causing a ≥ 0.03 iFR drop after stenting occurred in 11 (15.7%) cases. The study patients were divided into two groups according to biases between post-iFR and iFRpred < 0.03 (good concordance group) or ≥ 0.03 (poor concordance group). The pre-intervention heart rate was the only independent predictor of poor concordance (odds ratio, 0.936; 95% confidence interval 0.883-0.992; p = 0.027). Physiological maps under resting conditions may contribute to a reduction in unnecessary stent placements without missing lesions requiring treatment. However, the predictive accuracy of post-iFR performance in the present study was slightly lower than that in the previous reports.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32507942
doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00668-0
pii: 10.1007/s12928-020-00668-0
pmc: PMC8019415
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
208-218Références
Circulation. 2017 Nov 7;136(19):1798-1808
pubmed: 28851731
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2212-2241
pubmed: 28291663
Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):62-9
pubmed: 8319357
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Dec 1;110(11):1578-84
pubmed: 22921996
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Dec;7(12):1386-96
pubmed: 25459526
Circulation. 2011 Dec 6;124(23):e574-651
pubmed: 22064601
Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619
pubmed: 25173339
Circ Res. 1981 Sep;49(3):584-93
pubmed: 7261259
J Cardiol. 2018 May;71(5):458-463
pubmed: 29203079
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 20;176(2):399-404
pubmed: 25125008
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823
pubmed: 28317438
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):757-767
pubmed: 29673507
Circulation. 1990 Apr;81(4):1319-30
pubmed: 2317912
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 7;69(5):570-591
pubmed: 28012615
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018 Apr;33(2):99-108
pubmed: 27943219
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6):e001715
pubmed: 26025217
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Oct;24(4):1012-7
pubmed: 7930191
Eur Heart J. 1998 Aug;19(8):1214-23
pubmed: 9740343
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165
pubmed: 30165437
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Apr-May;16(3):167-71
pubmed: 25977227
Circ Res. 1964 Mar;14:250-9
pubmed: 14133952
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1782-8
pubmed: 8190154
Circulation. 2000 Apr 18;101(15):1840-7
pubmed: 10769286
Circulation. 2000 May 23;101(20):2361-7
pubmed: 10821811
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834
pubmed: 28317458
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;33(11):1677-1684
pubmed: 28597125
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402
pubmed: 22154731