Characteristics of proactive balance and gait performance in subacute stroke patients demonstrating varying reactive balance capacity: A research study.
Stroke
balance proactive control
balance reactive control
fall threshold
falls
gait
Journal
NeuroRehabilitation
ISSN: 1878-6448
Titre abrégé: NeuroRehabilitation
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9113791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
pubmed:
9
6
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
entrez:
9
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Persons with stroke (PwS) demonstrate impaired reactive balance control placing them at increased risk of falls. Yet, tests used in clinical practice to assess this risk usually rely on proactive balance control. To investigate differences in proactive balance in PwS with varying reactive balance capacity. Reactive balance control was assessed in 48 first-event subacute PwS by measuring multiple-step threshold and fall threshold in response to unannounced surface perturbations. They were classified as low-, medium- high- threshold fallers and non-fallers in accordance with the perturbation magnitude at which they were unable to maintain balance (fall threshold). Proactive balance control and gait performance were tested using the Berg Balance test, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC). PwS who demonstrated poor reactive balance capacity were also more impaired in their proactive balance and gait. Proactive balance and gait performance were significantly different between the 4 groups while ABC was not. The associations between reactive and proactive measures of balance were moderate (r = 0.53-0.67). The moderate correlations between reactive and proactive balance control suggest the recruitment of different neural mechanisms for these two operations, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating reactive balance in clinics.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Persons with stroke (PwS) demonstrate impaired reactive balance control placing them at increased risk of falls. Yet, tests used in clinical practice to assess this risk usually rely on proactive balance control.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To investigate differences in proactive balance in PwS with varying reactive balance capacity.
METHODS
METHODS
Reactive balance control was assessed in 48 first-event subacute PwS by measuring multiple-step threshold and fall threshold in response to unannounced surface perturbations. They were classified as low-, medium- high- threshold fallers and non-fallers in accordance with the perturbation magnitude at which they were unable to maintain balance (fall threshold). Proactive balance control and gait performance were tested using the Berg Balance test, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).
RESULTS
RESULTS
PwS who demonstrated poor reactive balance capacity were also more impaired in their proactive balance and gait. Proactive balance and gait performance were significantly different between the 4 groups while ABC was not. The associations between reactive and proactive measures of balance were moderate (r = 0.53-0.67).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The moderate correlations between reactive and proactive balance control suggest the recruitment of different neural mechanisms for these two operations, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating reactive balance in clinics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32508334
pii: NRE203039
doi: 10.3233/NRE-203039
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM