Factors Affecting the Degree of Angular Remodeling in Stent-Assisted Coiling of Bifurcation Aneurysms.

Angular remodeling Bifurcation aneurysm Recanalization Stent-assisted coiling

Journal

Interventional neurology
ISSN: 1664-9737
Titre abrégé: Interv Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606828

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Historique:
received: 07 05 2019
accepted: 11 07 2019
entrez: 9 6 2020
pubmed: 9 6 2020
medline: 9 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) leads to significant changes in the vascular angle altering the bifurcation geometry and the hemodynamics at the bifurcation apex. It is believed that the stent alone exerts this effect, but other possible factors have not been studied. To study the factors contributing to angular remodeling following SAC of bifurcation aneurysms including the anatomical, stent-related, and coil-related factors. We reviewed 43 basilar and carotid bifurcation aneurysms treated by SAC using Neuroform EZ ( The mean degree of stent-induced and coil-induced angular remodeling was 10.2 (0-47) and 4.53 (-7 to 30), respectively. The immediate postprocedural and delayed angular remodeling was 14.8 (-4 to 47) and 4.75 (-12 to 40), respectively. The degree of immediate remodeling was significantly affected by the actual in situ coil size ( Immediate angular remodeling following SAC of bifurcation aneurysms can happen after stenting or coiling or both. This is the first study reporting the role of the coils as an additional factor beside the stent in inducing immediate angular changes; this effect is correlated to the size of the coils. The pretreatment bifurcation angle is the most consistent factor affecting the degree of both immediate and delayed angular remodeling.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Stent-assisted coiling (SAC) leads to significant changes in the vascular angle altering the bifurcation geometry and the hemodynamics at the bifurcation apex. It is believed that the stent alone exerts this effect, but other possible factors have not been studied.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To study the factors contributing to angular remodeling following SAC of bifurcation aneurysms including the anatomical, stent-related, and coil-related factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
We reviewed 43 basilar and carotid bifurcation aneurysms treated by SAC using Neuroform EZ (
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean degree of stent-induced and coil-induced angular remodeling was 10.2 (0-47) and 4.53 (-7 to 30), respectively. The immediate postprocedural and delayed angular remodeling was 14.8 (-4 to 47) and 4.75 (-12 to 40), respectively. The degree of immediate remodeling was significantly affected by the actual in situ coil size (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Immediate angular remodeling following SAC of bifurcation aneurysms can happen after stenting or coiling or both. This is the first study reporting the role of the coils as an additional factor beside the stent in inducing immediate angular changes; this effect is correlated to the size of the coils. The pretreatment bifurcation angle is the most consistent factor affecting the degree of both immediate and delayed angular remodeling.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32508904
doi: 10.1159/000502058
pii: ine-0008-0220
pmc: PMC7253854
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

220-230

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Demetrius Lopes received research grants from Penumbra, Stryker, and Microvention, is a consultant/on the Advisory Board of Medtronic, Microvention, Asahi, and Siemens, and aprincipal investigator for Dawn, Swift Prime, and Therapy. Honoraria were granted by Stryker, Microvention, Medtronic, and Penumbra. Ownership interest/options were held by Crowdoptic, Three Rivers, Neurvana, MIVI, Blockade, NDI, Nextgen, Elum, and Bendit.

Références

Front Neurol. 2014 Apr 08;5:41
pubmed: 24782817
J Biomech Eng. 2011 Jul;133(7):071005
pubmed: 21823744
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 23;10(9):e0138648
pubmed: 26398847
J Biomech. 2012 May 11;45(8):1353-9
pubmed: 22483228
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 13;11(4):e0153403
pubmed: 27073908
Clin Radiol. 2014 Feb;69(2):e63-70
pubmed: 24286934
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):649-54
pubmed: 22194381
Ann Biomed Eng. 2010 Oct;38(10):3058-69
pubmed: 20499185
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):483-7
pubmed: 26359879
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1721-5
pubmed: 21816920
Neurosurgery. 2013 May;72(5):739-48; discussion 748
pubmed: 23328687

Auteurs

Ahmed Saied (A)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Neurology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Nada Elsaid (N)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Department of Neurology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Krishna Joshi (K)

Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Mohamed Gomaa (M)

Department of Neurology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Talal Amer (T)

Department of Radiology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Mohamed Saad (M)

Department of Neurology, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Demetrius Lopes (D)

Advocate Aurora Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Classifications MeSH