Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using a Xenograft Bone Substitute for Implant-Supported Fixed Rehabilitation: A Case Report with Four Years of Follow-Up.


Journal

Case reports in dentistry
ISSN: 2090-6447
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Dent
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101573242

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 18 04 2019
accepted: 02 05 2020
entrez: 9 6 2020
pubmed: 9 6 2020
medline: 9 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique has been used to achieve optimal bone volume augmentation and allow dental implant placement in atrophic maxilla and mandible, with predictable results and high survival rates. The use of bone substitutes has reduced the necessity of autogenous bone grafts, reducing the morbidity at the donor areas and thus improving the patients' satisfaction and comfort. This clinical case report shows a clinical and histological evaluation of the bone tissue behavior, in a case that required the horizontal augmentation of the alveolar ridge, with the use of xenograft biomaterial and further dental implant placement. After six months of healing time, six implants were placed, and a bone biopsy was done. The histological analysis depicted some fragments of the xenograft bone graft, integrated with the new-formed bone tissue.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32509356
doi: 10.1155/2020/6723936
pmc: PMC7245675
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

6723936

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Bruno Freitas Mello et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Références

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):429-36
pubmed: 21837309
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:218-36
pubmed: 19885447
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jun;21(6):567-76
pubmed: 20666785
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;44(10):1618-1629
pubmed: 27622971
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Summer;7 Suppl 2:S219-34
pubmed: 24977257
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):359-66
pubmed: 16907765
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jun;31(3):237-45
pubmed: 21556380
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Sep;23(3):271-279
pubmed: 31089897
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):502-10
pubmed: 19587874
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):361-9
pubmed: 12956480
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 May;31(2):163-191
pubmed: 30947846
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):299-307
pubmed: 23593623
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):521-530
pubmed: 30884111
J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jul;38(7):677-85
pubmed: 21557757
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan;19(1):19-25
pubmed: 17956571
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):404-14
pubmed: 21483894
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:49-70
pubmed: 18437791
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:113-23
pubmed: 19663958
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Oct;24(10):1065-73
pubmed: 22697628
Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):613-620
pubmed: 31246662

Auteurs

Bruno Freitas Mello (BF)

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Márcio de Carvalho Formiga (M)

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Luiz Fernando de Souza da Silva (LF)

Department of Implantology, Unisociesc, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Gustavo Dos Santos Coura (G)

Department of Implantology, Unisociesc, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Jamil Awad Shibli (JA)

Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Dental Research Division, University of Guarulhos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Classifications MeSH