Human Factor Considerations in Using Personal Protective Equipment in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context: Binational Survey Study.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 06 2020
Historique:
received: 07 05 2020
accepted: 02 06 2020
revised: 02 06 2020
pubmed: 9 6 2020
medline: 8 7 2020
entrez: 9 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Full level 1 personal protective equipment (PPE) is used in various domains and contexts. Prior research has shown influences of such equipment on performance, comfort, and contamination levels. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic forced a pervasive requirement of PPE, with little preparation, rushed deployment, inadequate time for training, and massive use by personnel who are inexperienced or not qualified in its effective use. This study aims to examine the key human factors (physical and ergonomic, perceptual and cognitive) that influence the use of level 1 PPE when attending to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The research approach consisted of a short survey disseminated to health care professionals in two countries, Israel and Portugal, with similar demographics and health care systems. The survey included 10 items with a 5-point Likert scale regarding the key human factors involved in level 1 PPE, as identified in prior research. A total of 722 respondents from Israel and 301 respondents from Portugal were included in the analysis. All the respondents reported using level 1 PPE with patients with COVID-19 in the range of several hours daily to several hours weekly. The Cronbach α was .73 for Israel and .75 for Portugal. Responses showed high levels of difficulty, with medians of 4 for items related to discomfort (n=539/688, 78% in Israel; n=328/377, 87% in Portugal), hearing (n=236/370, 64% in Portugal; n=321/642, 50% in Israel), seeing (n=697/763, 89% in Israel; n=317/376, 84% in Portugal), and doffing (n=290/374, 77% in Portugal; n=315/713, 44% in Israel). A factor analysis showed a set of strongly related variables consisting of hearing, understanding speech, and understanding the situation. This suggests that degradation in communication was strongly associated with degradation in situational awareness. A subsequent mediation analysis showed a direct effect of PPE discomfort on situational awareness (P<.001); this was also influenced (mediated) by difficulties in communicating, namely in hearing and understanding speech. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic is paving the way for updating PPE design. The use of already deployed technology affords ample opportunities to improve, adapt, and overcome caveats. The findings here suggest that the use of level 1 PPE with patients with COVID-19 has perceptual and cognitive effects, in addition to physical and ergonomic influences. Efforts should be taken to mitigate the harmful effects of such influences, both regarding the performance of medical actions and the risk of contamination to health care workers. Such efforts involve the design of PPE; the introduction of technologies to enhance vision, hearing, and communicating during the use of PPE; and training staff in using the equipment and in effective communication and teamwork protocols.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Full level 1 personal protective equipment (PPE) is used in various domains and contexts. Prior research has shown influences of such equipment on performance, comfort, and contamination levels. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic forced a pervasive requirement of PPE, with little preparation, rushed deployment, inadequate time for training, and massive use by personnel who are inexperienced or not qualified in its effective use.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to examine the key human factors (physical and ergonomic, perceptual and cognitive) that influence the use of level 1 PPE when attending to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
METHODS
The research approach consisted of a short survey disseminated to health care professionals in two countries, Israel and Portugal, with similar demographics and health care systems. The survey included 10 items with a 5-point Likert scale regarding the key human factors involved in level 1 PPE, as identified in prior research.
RESULTS
A total of 722 respondents from Israel and 301 respondents from Portugal were included in the analysis. All the respondents reported using level 1 PPE with patients with COVID-19 in the range of several hours daily to several hours weekly. The Cronbach α was .73 for Israel and .75 for Portugal. Responses showed high levels of difficulty, with medians of 4 for items related to discomfort (n=539/688, 78% in Israel; n=328/377, 87% in Portugal), hearing (n=236/370, 64% in Portugal; n=321/642, 50% in Israel), seeing (n=697/763, 89% in Israel; n=317/376, 84% in Portugal), and doffing (n=290/374, 77% in Portugal; n=315/713, 44% in Israel). A factor analysis showed a set of strongly related variables consisting of hearing, understanding speech, and understanding the situation. This suggests that degradation in communication was strongly associated with degradation in situational awareness. A subsequent mediation analysis showed a direct effect of PPE discomfort on situational awareness (P<.001); this was also influenced (mediated) by difficulties in communicating, namely in hearing and understanding speech.
CONCLUSIONS
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic is paving the way for updating PPE design. The use of already deployed technology affords ample opportunities to improve, adapt, and overcome caveats. The findings here suggest that the use of level 1 PPE with patients with COVID-19 has perceptual and cognitive effects, in addition to physical and ergonomic influences. Efforts should be taken to mitigate the harmful effects of such influences, both regarding the performance of medical actions and the risk of contamination to health care workers. Such efforts involve the design of PPE; the introduction of technologies to enhance vision, hearing, and communicating during the use of PPE; and training staff in using the equipment and in effective communication and teamwork protocols.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32511099
pii: v22i6e19947
doi: 10.2196/19947
pmc: PMC7301688
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e19947

Informations de copyright

©Avi Parush, Oren Wacht, Ricardo Gomes, Amit Frenkel. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 17.06.2020.

Références

Ergonomics. 2013;56(5):791-802
pubmed: 23514088
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S165-S170
pubmed: 31517978
J Safety Res. 2009 Oct;40(5):383-7
pubmed: 19932320
Nurs Stand. 2015 Aug 5;29(49):50-7
pubmed: 26243123
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Mar 13;:e13310
pubmed: 32170800
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Oct;9(5):543-6
pubmed: 25782591
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jul 1;44(7):840-2
pubmed: 27181222
J Biomed Inform. 2011 Jun;44(3):477-85
pubmed: 20381642
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017 Mar;23(1):1-20
pubmed: 27441587
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020 Apr;14(2):273-283
pubmed: 31397260
Ergonomics. 2006 Aug 15;49(10):955-67
pubmed: 16803726
J Safety Res. 2009;40(4):277-83
pubmed: 19778651
Appl Ergon. 1995 Jun;26(3):195-8
pubmed: 15677018
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2010 Jul;48(6):522-7
pubmed: 20550425
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Dec;41(12):1218-23
pubmed: 23768438
Am J Infect Control. 2019 May;47(5):595-598
pubmed: 30522839
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011 Mar-Apr;19(2):354-61
pubmed: 21584383
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1998 Dec;27(1-2):70-5
pubmed: 11579702
Ergonomics. 2004 Dec;47(15):1614-23
pubmed: 15545235
J Biol Eng. 2016 Feb 09;10:4
pubmed: 26865858
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;38(9):1077-1083
pubmed: 28606192
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;40(2):178-186
pubmed: 30520708
J Accid Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;17(2):115-8
pubmed: 10718233
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S199-S205
pubmed: 31517973
Work. 2012;41 Suppl 1:4979-82
pubmed: 22317491
Appl Ergon. 2007 Sep;38(5):591-600
pubmed: 17049477
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 22;14(1):e0210775
pubmed: 30668567
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 13;69(Suppl 3):S214-S220
pubmed: 31517977
Ergonomics. 2019 Sep;62(9):1193-1201
pubmed: 31204598
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Jan;41(1):8-13
pubmed: 22475568

Auteurs

Avi Parush (A)

Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Oren Wacht (O)

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Ricardo Gomes (R)

Department of Operational Medicine, Clinical Center of Guarda Nacional Republicana, Lisboa, Portugal.

Amit Frenkel (A)

Intensive Care Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH