Spectrum of Binocular Vision Anomalies in Keratoconus Subjects.
Accommodation, Ocular
/ physiology
Adult
Anisometropia
/ physiopathology
Corneal Topography
Depth Perception
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Keratoconus
/ diagnosis
Male
Microscopy, Acoustic
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
Prospective Studies
Retinoscopy
Tonometry, Ocular
Vision Disorders
/ diagnosis
Vision, Binocular
/ physiology
Visual Acuity
/ physiology
Young Adult
Journal
Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry
ISSN: 1538-9235
Titre abrégé: Optom Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
entrez:
9
6
2020
pubmed:
9
6
2020
medline:
24
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Keratoconus (KC) is typically a bilateral asymmetric corneal condition associated with anisometropia. A detailed evaluation of binocular vision function is therefore a critical component of ocular examination in these patients for early detection and treatment of binocular vision anomalies. The purposes of this study were to measure the various parameters of binocular vision (BV) in patients with KC and to identify the factors that possibly influence them. This was a prospective, observational study of BV in patients with KC and with best-corrected visual acuity ≤0.4 logMAR in each eye. Age-matched, nonstrabismic normal patients served as controls. Binocular vision examination included motor assessment, accommodation parameters, and fusional vergence. Binocular vision parameters of 84 KC patients were compared with those of 71 normal controls. The KC group showed statistically significant differences between fellow eyes in refractive cylinder (0.44 ± 2.1 D, P = .03), best-corrected visual acuity (0.06 ± 0.09 logMAR, P = .001), and maximum keratometry (6.64 ± 8.2D, P = .005). The control group showed no significant difference in any refractive or keratometric parameter between fellow eyes. Sixty-six (78.6%) of 84 KC patients had various combinations of BV anomalies: 48.8% had impaired stereopsis, 44% had abnormal fusional vergence, and 39.3% had accommodative infacility. Among individual parameters, all except accommodative amplitudes and negative distance fusional vergence showed statistically significant impairment compared with controls (P < .001). Median (interquartile range) stereoacuity was 70 (50 to 550) arc sec in the KC group and 40 (30 to 50) arc sec in control (P < .0001). There was a statistically significant but weak correlation between stereoacuity and positive fusional vergence for near (P = .008; Spearman coefficient, -0.28) and weak but significant negative correlation between phoria status and negative fusional vergence for near (P = .03; Spearman coefficient, -0.24). A large proportion of KC patients have BV anomalies. Assessment of BV function should be included in the clinical examination of all KC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32511164
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001517
pii: 00006324-202006000-00007
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
424-428Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297–19.
Alió JL, Shabayek MH. Corneal Higher Order Aberrations: A Method to Grade Keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2006;22:539–45.
Sherafat H, White JE, Pullum KW, et al. Anomalies of Binocular Function in Patients with Longstanding Asymmetric Keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1057–60.
Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E. The Epidemiology and Etiology of Keratoconus. Int J Keratoco Ectatic Corneal Dis 2012;1:7–15.
Belin MW, Fowler WC, Chambers WA. Keratoconus: Evaluation of Recent Trends in the Surgical and Nonsurgical Correction of Keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1988;95:335–9.
Antunes-Foschini RM, Coutinho JV, Rocha EM, et al. Oculomotor Status, Binocular Vision and Stereoacuity in a Series of Keratoconus Subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59:1869–77.
Nilagiri VK, Metlapally S, Kalaiselvan P, et al. LogMAR and Stereoacuity in Keratoconus Corrected with Spectacles and Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2018;95:391–8.
Zadnik K, Steger-May KS, Fink BA, et al. Between-eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus. Cornea 2002;21:671–9.
Wilson SE, Lin DT, Klyce SD. Corneal Topography of Keratoconus. Cornea 1991;10:2–8.
Rabinowitz YS, Nesburn AB, McDonnell PJ. Videokeratography of the Fellow Eye in Unilateral Keratoconus. Ophthalmology 1993;100:181–6.
Chopra I, Jain AK. Between Eye Asymmetry in Keratoconus in an Indian Population. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:146–52.
Brooks SE, Johnson D, Fischer N. Anisometropia and Binocularity. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1129–43.
Oguz H, Oguz V. The Effect of Experimentally Induced Anisometropia on Stereopsis. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2000;37:214–8.
Brahma A, Ennis F, Harper R, et al. Visual Function After Penetrating Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:60–6.
Khan AO, Al-Shamsi H. Binocular Diplopia Following Vision Restoration in Patients with Keratoconus and Sensory Strabismus. Strabismus 2008;16:19–22.
Sharma P, Saxena R, Narvekar M, et al. Evaluation of Distance Near Stereoacuity and Fusional Vergence in Intermittent Exotropia. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:121–5.
Jones-Jordan LA, Walline JJ, Sinnott LT, et al. Asymmetry in Keratoconus and Vision-related Quality of Life. Cornea 2013;32:267–72.
Levy NS, Glick EB. Steroscopic Perception and Snellen Visual Acuity. Am J Ophthalmol 1974;78:722–4.
Goodwin RT, Romano PE. Stereoacuity Degradation by Experimental and Real Monocular and Binocular Amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:917–23.