Space-Time Surveillance of Negative Emotions After Consecutive Terrorist Attacks in London.
GIS
Twitter
disaster
social media
terrorist attack
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 06 2020
04 06 2020
Historique:
received:
22
04
2020
revised:
28
05
2020
accepted:
28
05
2020
entrez:
10
6
2020
pubmed:
10
6
2020
medline:
6
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Terrorist attacks pose significant threats to mental health. There is dearth information about the impact of consecutive terrorist attacks on space-time concentrations of emotional reactions. This study collected (1) Twitter data following the two terrorist attacks in London in March and June of 2017, respectively, and (2) deprivation data at small areal levels in the United Kingdom. The space-time permutation model was used to detect the significant clusters of negative emotions, including fear, sadness, and anger in tweets. Logistic regression models were used to examine the social deprivation of communities associated with negative tweeting. The results reported two significant clusters after the March attack, one was in London, ten days after the attack, and the other was far from the attack site between Manchester and Birmingham, three days after the attack. Attention to the reoccurring attack in June diminished quickly. The socially deprived communities experienced double disadvantage-sending fewer tweets but expressing more negative emotions than their counterparts. The findings suggest that terrorism can affect public emotions far and broad. There is a potential for surveillance to rapidly identify geographically concentrated emotions after consecutive or prolonged disasters using social media data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32512901
pii: ijerph17114000
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114000
pmc: PMC7313064
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Health Soc Work. 2018 Aug 1;43(3):147-154
pubmed: 29897454
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e032693
pubmed: 32066602
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5;101(40):14551-6
pubmed: 15448203
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:169-83
pubmed: 24159920
Health Psychol. 1990;9(6):653-75
pubmed: 2286178
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Sep 25;6(9):190645
pubmed: 31598299
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1990 Jan;60(1):43-54
pubmed: 2305844
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(2):118-21
pubmed: 21281023
Lancet. 2016 May 28;387(10034):2195-6
pubmed: 27302026
PLoS Med. 2005 Mar;2(3):e59
pubmed: 15719066
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;190:94-6
pubmed: 17267923
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1507-12
pubmed: 11794216
J Ment Health. 2020 Apr;29(2):191-199
pubmed: 31694433
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8
pubmed: 17182981
Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87
pubmed: 8668867
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 28;346(13):982-7
pubmed: 11919308
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:306-312
pubmed: 29945072
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132464
pubmed: 26167942
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 17;15(10):
pubmed: 30336558
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;72(2):233-9
pubmed: 21208593
Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:78-91
pubmed: 15958429
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007 May;18(2):315-30
pubmed: 17483560
Stat Med. 2000 Apr 30;19(8):1059-79
pubmed: 10790680
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 06;10(11):e0142209
pubmed: 26544601
JAMA. 1999 Aug 25;282(8):755-62
pubmed: 10463711
Psychol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):467-80
pubmed: 17803838
Psychiatry. 2002 Fall;65(3):207-39
pubmed: 12405079
Risk Anal. 2017 Aug;37(8):1580-1605
pubmed: 28556273
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
Death Stud. 2020;44(6):366-374
pubmed: 30810477