Oral bait preferences and feasibility of oral rabies vaccination in Bangladeshi dogs.


Journal

Vaccine
ISSN: 1873-2518
Titre abrégé: Vaccine
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8406899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 07 2020
Historique:
received: 05 03 2020
revised: 13 05 2020
accepted: 15 05 2020
pubmed: 10 6 2020
medline: 28 4 2021
entrez: 10 6 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) can increase rabies vaccination coverage among dogs that are inaccessible to parenteral vaccination (i.e., inaccessible dogs). Because bait uptake can differ according to the bait attractant used and dog characteristics, we evaluated proportion of bait uptake and time to bait uptake using three bait formulations. We looked for associations between bait uptake and dog characteristics (temperament, age, and body condition) and assessed the efficiency of using these bait formulations, as measured by number of dogs vaccinated per hour. A total of 356 baits were offered to free roaming dogs in urban and peri-urban districts of Bangladesh. Fish baits were ignored by 86% (n = 122; 95% CI: 79-91%) of dogs, whereas 60% (n = 45; 95% CI: 49-70%) consumed egg baits and 89% (n = 124; 95% CI: 83-93%) consumed intestine baits. Among the consumed baits, dogs fully consumed 56% (n = 10; 95% CI: 34-75%) of fish baits, 84% (n = 38; 95% CI: 71-92%) of egg baits, and 98% (n = 122; 95% CI: 94-100%) of intestine baits. Among inaccessible dogs, no associations were found between bait uptake and dog characteristics in either bivariate or multivariate analyses. Bait consumption averaged 2 dogs per hour for fish baits, 10 dogs per hour for egg baits, and 18 dogs per hour for intestine baits. The absence of association between bait type preference and individual dog characteristics simplifies the process of choosing attractants for oral rabies vaccines. While intestine attractants achieved highest uptake, egg baits may prove a suitable compromise when considering biological and operational constraints. The efficiency of ORV was demonstrated when compared to parenteral vaccination of free-roaming dogs previously described.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32513512
pii: S0264-410X(20)30692-7
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.047
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Rabies Vaccines 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5021-5026

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Jesse Bonwitt (J)

Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jbonwitt@cdc.gov.

Sarah Bonaparte (S)

Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; ORISE Fellow, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Jesse Blanton (J)

Divison of Global Migration and Quarantine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Andrew D Gibson (AD)

Mission Rabies, Cranborne, UK; The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin, Midlothian, United Kingdom.

Mahbub Hoque (M)

TEPHINET, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Erin Kennedy (E)

Global Immunisation Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Kamrul Islam (K)

Zoonotic Disease Control Programme, Communicable Disease Control Unit, Directorate General of Health Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Umme Ruman Siddiqi (UR)

Zoonotic Disease Control Programme, Communicable Disease Control Unit, Directorate General of Health Services, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Ryan M Wallace (RM)

Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Shakif Azam (S)

Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH