Change in practice in gynecologic oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social media survey.
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Betacoronavirus
COVID-19
Combined Modality Therapy
Coronavirus Infections
/ prevention & control
Female
Genital Neoplasms, Female
/ diagnosis
Global Health
Gynecology
/ methods
Health Care Rationing
/ trends
Health Care Surveys
Health Services Accessibility
/ trends
Humans
Infection Control
/ methods
Male
Medical Oncology
/ methods
Middle Aged
Pandemics
/ prevention & control
Pneumonia, Viral
/ prevention & control
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ trends
SARS-CoV-2
Social Media
cervical cancer
gynecology
ovarian cancer
uterine cancer
vulvar and vaginal cancer
Journal
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
received:
05
05
2020
revised:
21
05
2020
accepted:
26
05
2020
pubmed:
10
6
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
entrez:
10
6
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
COVID-19 has affected gynecologic cancer management. The goal of this survey was to evaluate changes that occurred in gynecologic oncology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. A anonymous survey consisting of 33 questions (https://sites.google.com/view/gyncacovidfmartinelli) regarding interaction between gynecologic cancers and COVID-19 was distributed online via social media from April 9 to April 30, 2020. Basic descriptive statistics were applied. Analytics of survey-diffusion and generated-interest (visualizations, engagement rates, response rate) were analyzed. The survey received 20 836 visualizations, generating an average engagement rates by reach of 4.7%. The response rate was 30%. A total of 86% of respondents completed the survey, for a total of 187 physicians surveyed across 49 countries. The majority (143/187; 76%) were gynecologic oncologists, and most were ≤50 years old (146/187; 78%). A total of 49.7% (93/187) were facing the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, while 26.7% (50/187) and 23.5% (44/187) were in the peak and plateau phases, respectively. For 97.3% (182/187) of respondents COVID-19 affected or changed their respective clinical practice. Between 16% (27/165) (before surgery) and 25% (26/102) (before medical treatment) did not perform any tests to rule out COVID-19 infection among patients. The majority of respondents did not alter indications of treatment if patients were COVID-19-negative, while treatments were generally postponed in COVID-19-positive patients. Treatments were considered priority for: early stage high-risk uterine cancers (85/187; 45%), newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer (76/187; 41%), and locally advanced cervical cancer (76/187; 41%). Treatment of early stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer was deferred according to 49% (91/187) of respondents, with hormonal treatment as the option of therapy (31%; 56/178). A total of 77% (136/177) of respondents reported no changes in (surgical) treatment for early stage cervical cancer in COVID-19-negative patients, while treatment was postponed by 54% (96/177) of respondent, if the patient tested COVID-19-positive. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancers was considered by over one-third of respondents as well as hypofractionation of radiation treatment for locally advanced cervical cancers. COVID-19 affected the treatment of gynecologic cancers patients, both in terms of prioritization and identification of strategies to reduce hospital access and length of stay. Social media is a reliable tool to perform fast-tracking, worldwide surveys.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32513664
pii: ijgc-2020-001585
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001585
pmc: PMC7299657
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1101-1107Informations de copyright
© IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Apr;30(4):409-423
pubmed: 32193219
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Apr;121(1):143-7
pubmed: 21269668
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018 Oct 06;26:71-74
pubmed: 30364812
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):803-813
pubmed: 28885397
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):561-563
pubmed: 32221023
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jul;37(9):890-897
pubmed: 32000293
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):191-199
pubmed: 31006839
Cancer. 2019 Dec 15;125 Suppl 24:4573-4577
pubmed: 31967675
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e86
pubmed: 29027404
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jul;28(6):1226-1231
pubmed: 29958236
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 31;2019(10):
pubmed: 31684686
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 16;21(12):e14684
pubmed: 31841114
Int J Telemed Appl. 2019 Dec 2;2019:6323962
pubmed: 31885550
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jun;30(6):845-852
pubmed: 32341114
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2019;84(1):50-55
pubmed: 30099446